34. Radial artery ultrasound preceding transradial coronary angiography

Transradial approaches (TRA) became the preferred vascular access during conventional coronary angiography (CCA). In fact a smaller mean radial artery diameter (RAD) may lead to higher rates of vascular access complications (VAC); however, there are no data regarding the effect of radial cross secti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rami Abazid, Osama A. Smettei, Haitham Saker, Sawsan Sayed, Mohamed Z. Mohamed, Mobadah Kattea, Annie Suresh, Yaser Bashir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Saudi Heart Association 2015-10-01
Series:Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1016731515002742
id doaj-d47b855b8e9748b4ae83804987a2a002
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d47b855b8e9748b4ae83804987a2a0022020-11-25T03:31:18ZengSaudi Heart AssociationJournal of the Saudi Heart Association1016-73152015-10-0127431310.1016/j.jsha.2015.05.21534. Radial artery ultrasound preceding transradial coronary angiographyRami AbazidOsama A. SmetteiHaitham SakerSawsan SayedMohamed Z. MohamedMobadah KatteaAnnie SureshYaser BashirTransradial approaches (TRA) became the preferred vascular access during conventional coronary angiography (CCA). In fact a smaller mean radial artery diameter (RAD) may lead to higher rates of vascular access complications (VAC); however, there are no data regarding the effect of radial cross sectional area (CSA) and perimeter. We therefore evaluated the impact of preprocedure radial artery diameter, CSA and perimeter on vascular complications. Methods: We conducted a single-center prospective analysis of 207 patients underwent CCA. A radial artery ultrasound performed pre and post CCA to measure RAD, CSA, and perimeter. Results: The average RAD, CSA and perimeter were (2.7  ±  0.55 mm), (6.3  ±  1.9 mm2), (9.2  ±  1.7 mm) respectively. The same measurements were significantly larger in men than in women (2.8  ±  0.5 vs. 2.3  ±  0.4 mm [P < 0.0001], 6.7  ±  1.8 vs. 4.9  ±  1.4 mm [P <  0.0001], and 9.6  ±  1.5 vs. 9  ±  1.7 mm [P =  0.001], respectively). Fourteen patients (6.8%) had VACs. The RAD, CSA and perimeter were significantly smaller in procedures with VACs than in procedure with no complications (2.1 ± 0.5 vs. 2.7 ± 0.5 [P =  0.014], 4.6 ± 1.4 vs. 9.4 ± 1.6 [P =  0.014], and 7.2 ± 1.8 vs. 9.4 ± 1.6 [P =  0.022], respectively). Univariate logistic regression showed that radial ultrasonic parameters can independently predict VACs as follows: RAD (Odds ratio (OR) = 1.4. 95% CI 1.08–1.68, p = 007) for RAD, (OR = 2. 26. 95% CI 1.11–4.58, p = 0. 24) For CSA and (OR = 2.86. 95% CI 1.3–6, p = 0. 006) for perimeter. Summary: ultrasonic study of the radial artery before CCA can provide important information regarding the vascular access. We found that a smaller radial diameter, CSA and perimeter are associated with higher rates of VACs.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1016731515002742
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rami Abazid
Osama A. Smettei
Haitham Saker
Sawsan Sayed
Mohamed Z. Mohamed
Mobadah Kattea
Annie Suresh
Yaser Bashir
spellingShingle Rami Abazid
Osama A. Smettei
Haitham Saker
Sawsan Sayed
Mohamed Z. Mohamed
Mobadah Kattea
Annie Suresh
Yaser Bashir
34. Radial artery ultrasound preceding transradial coronary angiography
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
author_facet Rami Abazid
Osama A. Smettei
Haitham Saker
Sawsan Sayed
Mohamed Z. Mohamed
Mobadah Kattea
Annie Suresh
Yaser Bashir
author_sort Rami Abazid
title 34. Radial artery ultrasound preceding transradial coronary angiography
title_short 34. Radial artery ultrasound preceding transradial coronary angiography
title_full 34. Radial artery ultrasound preceding transradial coronary angiography
title_fullStr 34. Radial artery ultrasound preceding transradial coronary angiography
title_full_unstemmed 34. Radial artery ultrasound preceding transradial coronary angiography
title_sort 34. radial artery ultrasound preceding transradial coronary angiography
publisher Saudi Heart Association
series Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
issn 1016-7315
publishDate 2015-10-01
description Transradial approaches (TRA) became the preferred vascular access during conventional coronary angiography (CCA). In fact a smaller mean radial artery diameter (RAD) may lead to higher rates of vascular access complications (VAC); however, there are no data regarding the effect of radial cross sectional area (CSA) and perimeter. We therefore evaluated the impact of preprocedure radial artery diameter, CSA and perimeter on vascular complications. Methods: We conducted a single-center prospective analysis of 207 patients underwent CCA. A radial artery ultrasound performed pre and post CCA to measure RAD, CSA, and perimeter. Results: The average RAD, CSA and perimeter were (2.7  ±  0.55 mm), (6.3  ±  1.9 mm2), (9.2  ±  1.7 mm) respectively. The same measurements were significantly larger in men than in women (2.8  ±  0.5 vs. 2.3  ±  0.4 mm [P < 0.0001], 6.7  ±  1.8 vs. 4.9  ±  1.4 mm [P <  0.0001], and 9.6  ±  1.5 vs. 9  ±  1.7 mm [P =  0.001], respectively). Fourteen patients (6.8%) had VACs. The RAD, CSA and perimeter were significantly smaller in procedures with VACs than in procedure with no complications (2.1 ± 0.5 vs. 2.7 ± 0.5 [P =  0.014], 4.6 ± 1.4 vs. 9.4 ± 1.6 [P =  0.014], and 7.2 ± 1.8 vs. 9.4 ± 1.6 [P =  0.022], respectively). Univariate logistic regression showed that radial ultrasonic parameters can independently predict VACs as follows: RAD (Odds ratio (OR) = 1.4. 95% CI 1.08–1.68, p = 007) for RAD, (OR = 2. 26. 95% CI 1.11–4.58, p = 0. 24) For CSA and (OR = 2.86. 95% CI 1.3–6, p = 0. 006) for perimeter. Summary: ultrasonic study of the radial artery before CCA can provide important information regarding the vascular access. We found that a smaller radial diameter, CSA and perimeter are associated with higher rates of VACs.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1016731515002742
work_keys_str_mv AT ramiabazid 34radialarteryultrasoundprecedingtransradialcoronaryangiography
AT osamaasmettei 34radialarteryultrasoundprecedingtransradialcoronaryangiography
AT haithamsaker 34radialarteryultrasoundprecedingtransradialcoronaryangiography
AT sawsansayed 34radialarteryultrasoundprecedingtransradialcoronaryangiography
AT mohamedzmohamed 34radialarteryultrasoundprecedingtransradialcoronaryangiography
AT mobadahkattea 34radialarteryultrasoundprecedingtransradialcoronaryangiography
AT anniesuresh 34radialarteryultrasoundprecedingtransradialcoronaryangiography
AT yaserbashir 34radialarteryultrasoundprecedingtransradialcoronaryangiography
_version_ 1724572372558675968