Social Context Modulates Tolerance for Pragmatic Violations in Binary but Not Graded Judgments

A common method for investigating pragmatic processing and its development in children is to have participants make binary judgments of underinformative (UI) statements such as Some elephants are mammals. Rejection of such statements indicates that a (not-all) scalar implicature has been computed. A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Les Sikos, Minjae Kim, Daniel J. Grodner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00510/full
id doaj-d48a98f3f470418982af95da6b4594c7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d48a98f3f470418982af95da6b4594c72020-11-24T21:18:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-03-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.00510397658Social Context Modulates Tolerance for Pragmatic Violations in Binary but Not Graded JudgmentsLes Sikos0Minjae Kim1Daniel J. Grodner2Department of Language Science and Technology, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, Boston College, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, United StatesA common method for investigating pragmatic processing and its development in children is to have participants make binary judgments of underinformative (UI) statements such as Some elephants are mammals. Rejection of such statements indicates that a (not-all) scalar implicature has been computed. Acceptance of UI statements is typically taken as evidence that the perceiver has not computed an implicature. Under this assumption, the results of binary judgment studies in children and adults suggest that computing an implicature may be cognitively costly. For instance, children under 7 years of age are systematically more likely to accept UI statements compared to adults. This makes sense if children have fewer processing resources than adults. However, Katsos and Bishop (2011) found that young children are able to detect violations of informativeness when given graded rather than binary response options. They propose that children simply have a greater tolerance for pragmatic violations than do adults. The present work examines whether this pragmatic tolerance plays a role in adult binary judgment tasks. We manipulated social attributes of a speaker in an attempt to influence how accepting a perceiver might be of the speaker’s utterances. This manipulation affected acceptability rates for binary judgments (Experiment 1) but not for graded judgments (Experiment 2). These results raise concerns about the widespread use of binary choice tasks for investigating pragmatic processing and undermine the existing evidence suggesting that computing scalar implicatures is costly.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00510/fulllanguagepragmaticsinferencepragmatic tolerancescalar implicaturetruth value judgment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Les Sikos
Minjae Kim
Daniel J. Grodner
spellingShingle Les Sikos
Minjae Kim
Daniel J. Grodner
Social Context Modulates Tolerance for Pragmatic Violations in Binary but Not Graded Judgments
Frontiers in Psychology
language
pragmatics
inference
pragmatic tolerance
scalar implicature
truth value judgment
author_facet Les Sikos
Minjae Kim
Daniel J. Grodner
author_sort Les Sikos
title Social Context Modulates Tolerance for Pragmatic Violations in Binary but Not Graded Judgments
title_short Social Context Modulates Tolerance for Pragmatic Violations in Binary but Not Graded Judgments
title_full Social Context Modulates Tolerance for Pragmatic Violations in Binary but Not Graded Judgments
title_fullStr Social Context Modulates Tolerance for Pragmatic Violations in Binary but Not Graded Judgments
title_full_unstemmed Social Context Modulates Tolerance for Pragmatic Violations in Binary but Not Graded Judgments
title_sort social context modulates tolerance for pragmatic violations in binary but not graded judgments
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2019-03-01
description A common method for investigating pragmatic processing and its development in children is to have participants make binary judgments of underinformative (UI) statements such as Some elephants are mammals. Rejection of such statements indicates that a (not-all) scalar implicature has been computed. Acceptance of UI statements is typically taken as evidence that the perceiver has not computed an implicature. Under this assumption, the results of binary judgment studies in children and adults suggest that computing an implicature may be cognitively costly. For instance, children under 7 years of age are systematically more likely to accept UI statements compared to adults. This makes sense if children have fewer processing resources than adults. However, Katsos and Bishop (2011) found that young children are able to detect violations of informativeness when given graded rather than binary response options. They propose that children simply have a greater tolerance for pragmatic violations than do adults. The present work examines whether this pragmatic tolerance plays a role in adult binary judgment tasks. We manipulated social attributes of a speaker in an attempt to influence how accepting a perceiver might be of the speaker’s utterances. This manipulation affected acceptability rates for binary judgments (Experiment 1) but not for graded judgments (Experiment 2). These results raise concerns about the widespread use of binary choice tasks for investigating pragmatic processing and undermine the existing evidence suggesting that computing scalar implicatures is costly.
topic language
pragmatics
inference
pragmatic tolerance
scalar implicature
truth value judgment
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00510/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lessikos socialcontextmodulatestoleranceforpragmaticviolationsinbinarybutnotgradedjudgments
AT minjaekim socialcontextmodulatestoleranceforpragmaticviolationsinbinarybutnotgradedjudgments
AT danieljgrodner socialcontextmodulatestoleranceforpragmaticviolationsinbinarybutnotgradedjudgments
_version_ 1726010304731545600