Social Context Modulates Tolerance for Pragmatic Violations in Binary but Not Graded Judgments
A common method for investigating pragmatic processing and its development in children is to have participants make binary judgments of underinformative (UI) statements such as Some elephants are mammals. Rejection of such statements indicates that a (not-all) scalar implicature has been computed. A...
Main Authors: | Les Sikos, Minjae Kim, Daniel J. Grodner |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00510/full |
Similar Items
-
Development of Quantitative and Temporal Scalar Implicatures in a Felicity Judgment Task
by: Walter Schaeken, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
The Understanding of Scalar Implicatures in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Dichotomized Responses to Violations of Informativeness
by: Walter Schaeken, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01) -
Linking Hypothesis and Number of Response Options Modulate Inferred Scalar Implicature Rate
by: Masoud Jasbi, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
Processing Presuppositions and Implicatures: Similarities and Differences
by: Cory Bill, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01) -
Eye Movement Evidence for Context-Sensitive Derivation of Scalar Inferences
by: Stephen Politzer-Ahles, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)