Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Intention-to-treat versus per-protocol analysis
During the conduct of clinical trials, it is not uncommon to have protocol violations or inability to assess outcomes. This article in our series on common pitfalls in statistical analysis explains the complexities of analyzing results from such trials and highlights the importance of "intentio...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Perspectives in Clinical Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2016;volume=7;issue=3;spage=144;epage=146;aulast=Ranganathan |
id |
doaj-d499cf7a531b478598801c94a349cb35 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d499cf7a531b478598801c94a349cb352020-11-24T20:53:01ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsPerspectives in Clinical Research2229-34852016-01-017314414610.4103/2229-3485.184823Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Intention-to-treat versus per-protocol analysisPriya RanganathanC S PrameshRakesh AggarwalDuring the conduct of clinical trials, it is not uncommon to have protocol violations or inability to assess outcomes. This article in our series on common pitfalls in statistical analysis explains the complexities of analyzing results from such trials and highlights the importance of "intention-to-treat" analysis.http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2016;volume=7;issue=3;spage=144;epage=146;aulast=RanganathanBiasbiostatisticsintention-to-treat analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Priya Ranganathan C S Pramesh Rakesh Aggarwal |
spellingShingle |
Priya Ranganathan C S Pramesh Rakesh Aggarwal Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Intention-to-treat versus per-protocol analysis Perspectives in Clinical Research Bias biostatistics intention-to-treat analysis |
author_facet |
Priya Ranganathan C S Pramesh Rakesh Aggarwal |
author_sort |
Priya Ranganathan |
title |
Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Intention-to-treat versus per-protocol analysis |
title_short |
Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Intention-to-treat versus per-protocol analysis |
title_full |
Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Intention-to-treat versus per-protocol analysis |
title_fullStr |
Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Intention-to-treat versus per-protocol analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Intention-to-treat versus per-protocol analysis |
title_sort |
common pitfalls in statistical analysis: intention-to-treat versus per-protocol analysis |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Perspectives in Clinical Research |
issn |
2229-3485 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
During the conduct of clinical trials, it is not uncommon to have protocol violations or inability to assess outcomes. This article in our series on common pitfalls in statistical analysis explains the complexities of analyzing results from such trials and highlights the importance of "intention-to-treat" analysis. |
topic |
Bias biostatistics intention-to-treat analysis |
url |
http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2016;volume=7;issue=3;spage=144;epage=146;aulast=Ranganathan |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT priyaranganathan commonpitfallsinstatisticalanalysisintentiontotreatversusperprotocolanalysis AT cspramesh commonpitfallsinstatisticalanalysisintentiontotreatversusperprotocolanalysis AT rakeshaggarwal commonpitfallsinstatisticalanalysisintentiontotreatversusperprotocolanalysis |
_version_ |
1716798374512951296 |