Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Intention-to-treat versus per-protocol analysis
During the conduct of clinical trials, it is not uncommon to have protocol violations or inability to assess outcomes. This article in our series on common pitfalls in statistical analysis explains the complexities of analyzing results from such trials and highlights the importance of "intentio...
Main Authors: | Priya Ranganathan, C S Pramesh, Rakesh Aggarwal |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Perspectives in Clinical Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2016;volume=7;issue=3;spage=144;epage=146;aulast=Ranganathan |
Similar Items
-
Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Absolute risk reduction, relative risk reduction, and number needed to treat
by: Priya Ranganathan, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: "No evidence of effect" versus "evidence of no effect"
by: Priya Ranganathan, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Odds versus risk
by: Priya Ranganathan, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: "P" values, statistical significance and confidence intervals
by: Priya Ranganathan, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Measures of agreement
by: Priya Ranganathan, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)