Defining Targets for Reversing Declines of Soil Carbon in High-Intensity Arable Cropping

Soil organic carbon (SOC) is declining globally due to intensification of agriculture. Reversing declines should reduce soil erosion, maintain yields, raise the soil’s atmospheric carbon sink, and improve habitat for biodiversity. Commercial fields were sampled in a diverse European Atlantic zone cr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Geoffrey R. Squire, Mark Young, Linda Ford, Gillian Banks, Cathy Hawes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
SOC
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/7/973
id doaj-d4b67a8e15c144feb0a01ebbca8485e8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d4b67a8e15c144feb0a01ebbca8485e82021-04-02T12:38:49ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952020-07-011097397310.3390/agronomy10070973Defining Targets for Reversing Declines of Soil Carbon in High-Intensity Arable CroppingGeoffrey R. Squire0Mark Young1Linda Ford2Gillian Banks3Cathy Hawes4James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, Scotland, UKJames Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, Scotland, UKJames Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, Scotland, UKJames Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, Scotland, UKJames Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, Scotland, UKSoil organic carbon (SOC) is declining globally due to intensification of agriculture. Reversing declines should reduce soil erosion, maintain yields, raise the soil’s atmospheric carbon sink, and improve habitat for biodiversity. Commercial fields were sampled in a diverse European Atlantic zone cropland to relate SOC status to cropping intensity and to define a realistic target for restoration. SOC (%C by mass) decreased from 4% to 2% as the proportion of high-intensity crops increased from zero to 55% (linear regression, F pr. < 0.001). In further sampling in and around high-intensity fields, mean SOC increased from 2.4% in cultivated soil to 3.3% in field margins and 4.8% in nearby uncultivated land (F pr. < 0.001). Three broad zones of SOC in close spatial proximity were then defined: 1) high-intensity arable from 1% to 3%, 2) mid-intensity arable and arable-grass from 3% to 5% and 3) uncultivated and semi-natural land from 5% upwards. C:N ratio was constrained around 12, unaffected by cropping intensity, but slightly lower in fields than in margins and uncultivated land (F pr. < 0.001). A feasible target SOC of just above 3% was defined for high-intensity sites. There should be no biophysical obstacle to raising SOC above 3% in the high-input sector. Results argue against treating cropland of this type as uniform: assessment and restoration should be implemented field by field.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/7/973carbonnitrogenC:N ratiosoil organic carbonSOCintensified agriculture
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Geoffrey R. Squire
Mark Young
Linda Ford
Gillian Banks
Cathy Hawes
spellingShingle Geoffrey R. Squire
Mark Young
Linda Ford
Gillian Banks
Cathy Hawes
Defining Targets for Reversing Declines of Soil Carbon in High-Intensity Arable Cropping
Agronomy
carbon
nitrogen
C:N ratio
soil organic carbon
SOC
intensified agriculture
author_facet Geoffrey R. Squire
Mark Young
Linda Ford
Gillian Banks
Cathy Hawes
author_sort Geoffrey R. Squire
title Defining Targets for Reversing Declines of Soil Carbon in High-Intensity Arable Cropping
title_short Defining Targets for Reversing Declines of Soil Carbon in High-Intensity Arable Cropping
title_full Defining Targets for Reversing Declines of Soil Carbon in High-Intensity Arable Cropping
title_fullStr Defining Targets for Reversing Declines of Soil Carbon in High-Intensity Arable Cropping
title_full_unstemmed Defining Targets for Reversing Declines of Soil Carbon in High-Intensity Arable Cropping
title_sort defining targets for reversing declines of soil carbon in high-intensity arable cropping
publisher MDPI AG
series Agronomy
issn 2073-4395
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Soil organic carbon (SOC) is declining globally due to intensification of agriculture. Reversing declines should reduce soil erosion, maintain yields, raise the soil’s atmospheric carbon sink, and improve habitat for biodiversity. Commercial fields were sampled in a diverse European Atlantic zone cropland to relate SOC status to cropping intensity and to define a realistic target for restoration. SOC (%C by mass) decreased from 4% to 2% as the proportion of high-intensity crops increased from zero to 55% (linear regression, F pr. < 0.001). In further sampling in and around high-intensity fields, mean SOC increased from 2.4% in cultivated soil to 3.3% in field margins and 4.8% in nearby uncultivated land (F pr. < 0.001). Three broad zones of SOC in close spatial proximity were then defined: 1) high-intensity arable from 1% to 3%, 2) mid-intensity arable and arable-grass from 3% to 5% and 3) uncultivated and semi-natural land from 5% upwards. C:N ratio was constrained around 12, unaffected by cropping intensity, but slightly lower in fields than in margins and uncultivated land (F pr. < 0.001). A feasible target SOC of just above 3% was defined for high-intensity sites. There should be no biophysical obstacle to raising SOC above 3% in the high-input sector. Results argue against treating cropland of this type as uniform: assessment and restoration should be implemented field by field.
topic carbon
nitrogen
C:N ratio
soil organic carbon
SOC
intensified agriculture
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/7/973
work_keys_str_mv AT geoffreyrsquire definingtargetsforreversingdeclinesofsoilcarboninhighintensityarablecropping
AT markyoung definingtargetsforreversingdeclinesofsoilcarboninhighintensityarablecropping
AT lindaford definingtargetsforreversingdeclinesofsoilcarboninhighintensityarablecropping
AT gillianbanks definingtargetsforreversingdeclinesofsoilcarboninhighintensityarablecropping
AT cathyhawes definingtargetsforreversingdeclinesofsoilcarboninhighintensityarablecropping
_version_ 1721568282150961152