How to Write a Memo to Convince a President: Walter Heller, Policy-Advising, and the Kennedy Tax Cut

Walter Heller’s success in convincing JF Kennedy to pass a “tax cut” when he was chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors in the 1960s is often heralded as the poster child for economists’ policy influence, yet also sometimes seen as a lost golden age. The purpose of this paper is to reinvestiga...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Beatrice Cherrier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association Œconomia 2019-06-01
Series:Œconomia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/oeconomia/5714
id doaj-d4ba389023e740f89999d9243a10293e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d4ba389023e740f89999d9243a10293e2020-11-25T00:05:18ZengAssociation ŒconomiaŒconomia2113-52072019-06-019231533510.4000/oeconomia.5714How to Write a Memo to Convince a President: Walter Heller, Policy-Advising, and the Kennedy Tax CutBeatrice CherrierWalter Heller’s success in convincing JF Kennedy to pass a “tax cut” when he was chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors in the 1960s is often heralded as the poster child for economists’ policy influence, yet also sometimes seen as a lost golden age. The purpose of this paper is to reinvestigate how Heller channeled his expertise into policy, and what lessons he drew on how economists should engage with public reason. The paper first zooms onto the historical “footsteps” of Heller’s CEA tenure: his memos. I show that Heller considered himself as “an educator of presidents,” but that in educating, he was also led to commission some academic work that altered the science he was trying to disseminate. The underlying emphasis, thus, is not just on how economic knowledge affects public reason, but also how public reason shapes economics science. I then analyze how Heller “theorized” his and his colleagues’ practices in the late 1960s, in particular what stance he took on three contentious issues: the place of science and persuasion in advisers’ interaction with their publics, how much normative values are involved in advising, and whether advising should rely on a disciplinary consensus. I conclude that the institutional and personal context of the 1960s entailed a highly personalized vision of advising, at odd with the tool-based vision underlying the subsequent “economicization” of economic policy in the following decades.http://journals.openedition.org/oeconomia/5714Heller (Walter W.)fiscal policytax cutKeynesianismTobin (James)Kennedy (John F.)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Beatrice Cherrier
spellingShingle Beatrice Cherrier
How to Write a Memo to Convince a President: Walter Heller, Policy-Advising, and the Kennedy Tax Cut
Œconomia
Heller (Walter W.)
fiscal policy
tax cut
Keynesianism
Tobin (James)
Kennedy (John F.)
author_facet Beatrice Cherrier
author_sort Beatrice Cherrier
title How to Write a Memo to Convince a President: Walter Heller, Policy-Advising, and the Kennedy Tax Cut
title_short How to Write a Memo to Convince a President: Walter Heller, Policy-Advising, and the Kennedy Tax Cut
title_full How to Write a Memo to Convince a President: Walter Heller, Policy-Advising, and the Kennedy Tax Cut
title_fullStr How to Write a Memo to Convince a President: Walter Heller, Policy-Advising, and the Kennedy Tax Cut
title_full_unstemmed How to Write a Memo to Convince a President: Walter Heller, Policy-Advising, and the Kennedy Tax Cut
title_sort how to write a memo to convince a president: walter heller, policy-advising, and the kennedy tax cut
publisher Association Œconomia
series Œconomia
issn 2113-5207
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Walter Heller’s success in convincing JF Kennedy to pass a “tax cut” when he was chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors in the 1960s is often heralded as the poster child for economists’ policy influence, yet also sometimes seen as a lost golden age. The purpose of this paper is to reinvestigate how Heller channeled his expertise into policy, and what lessons he drew on how economists should engage with public reason. The paper first zooms onto the historical “footsteps” of Heller’s CEA tenure: his memos. I show that Heller considered himself as “an educator of presidents,” but that in educating, he was also led to commission some academic work that altered the science he was trying to disseminate. The underlying emphasis, thus, is not just on how economic knowledge affects public reason, but also how public reason shapes economics science. I then analyze how Heller “theorized” his and his colleagues’ practices in the late 1960s, in particular what stance he took on three contentious issues: the place of science and persuasion in advisers’ interaction with their publics, how much normative values are involved in advising, and whether advising should rely on a disciplinary consensus. I conclude that the institutional and personal context of the 1960s entailed a highly personalized vision of advising, at odd with the tool-based vision underlying the subsequent “economicization” of economic policy in the following decades.
topic Heller (Walter W.)
fiscal policy
tax cut
Keynesianism
Tobin (James)
Kennedy (John F.)
url http://journals.openedition.org/oeconomia/5714
work_keys_str_mv AT beatricecherrier howtowriteamemotoconvinceapresidentwalterhellerpolicyadvisingandthekennedytaxcut
_version_ 1725425842612338688