Use of an animal model to test whether non-alcoholic fatty liver disease increases the risk of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury

• Main Authors: Alastair Mak, Tiffany Cho, Jack Uetrecht
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-01-01
• Series: Journal of Immunotoxicology
• Subjects: Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury; non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; animal model
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1547691X.2018.1467982

Clinical evidence suggests that most idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is immune-mediated. The danger hypothesis suggests that liver injury and inflammation would increase the risk of an immune response leading to IDILI. Therefore, a reasonable hypothesis would be that an underlying chronic liver disease such as non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) would increase the risk of developing IDILI due to inflammation and release of danger signals from damaged cells. In order to test this hypothesis, mice were fed a methionine-/choline-deficient (MCD) diet that produces a consistent NASH phenotype, along with amodiaquine (AQ) – a drug known to cause IDILI in humans. This study employed both wild-type C57BL/6 mice and PD-1−/− mice co-treated with anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. The PD-1−/− + anti-CTLA-4 model produces an immune-mediated liver injury very similar to the idiosyncratic liver injury observed in humans. The liver injury observed in the present experiment was dominated by the injury caused by the MCD diet; there was no significant difference between mice treated with the MCD diet alone and those also treated with AQ, whether in wild-type mice of the PD-1−/− model. Therefore, the MCD diet, which results in a state that mimics NASH, did not appear to increase the liver injury associated with AQ treatment. Ultimately, an animal model is just that – only a model, and cannot provide a definitive answer to clinical questions. However, given the difficulty of performing clinical studies with appropriate control populations, the present results provide important evidence to support a general clinical finding that underlying liver injury does not usually increase the risk of IDILI.