Machine Learning Applied to Electrified Vehicle Battery State of Charge and State of Health Estimation: State-of-the-Art

The growing interest and recent breakthroughs in artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) have actively contributed to an increase in research and development of new methods to estimate the states of electrified vehicle batteries. Data-driven approaches, such as ML, are becoming more popula...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlos Vidal, Pawel Malysz, Phillip Kollmeyer, Ali Emadi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2020-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9036949/
Description
Summary:The growing interest and recent breakthroughs in artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) have actively contributed to an increase in research and development of new methods to estimate the states of electrified vehicle batteries. Data-driven approaches, such as ML, are becoming more popular for estimating the state of charge (SOC) and state of health (SOH) due to greater availability of battery data and improved computing power capabilities. This paper provides a survey of battery state estimation methods based on ML approaches such as feedforward neural networks (FNNs), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), support vector machines (SVM), radial basis functions (RBF), and Hamming networks. Comparisons between methods are shown in terms of data quality, inputs and outputs, test conditions, battery types, and stated accuracy to give readers a bigger picture view of the ML landscape for SOC and SOH estimation. Additionally, to provide insight into how to best approach with the comparison of different neural network structures, an FNN and long short-term memory (LSTM) RNN are trained fifty times each for 3000 epochs. The error is somewhat different for each training repetition due to the random initial values of the trainable parameters, demonstrating that it is important to train networks multiple times to achieve the best result. Furthermore, it is recommended that when performing a comparison among estimation techniques such as those presented in this review paper, the compared networks should have a similar number of learnable parameters and be trained and tested with identical data. Otherwise, it is difficult to make a general conclusion regarding the quality of a given estimation technique.
ISSN:2169-3536