Comparison of Two Approaches for the Metataxonomic Analysis of the Human Milk Microbiome

Recent work has demonstrated the existence of large inter-individual and inter-population variability in the microbiota of human milk from healthy women living across variable geographical and socio-cultural settings. However, no studies have evaluated the impact that variable sequencing approaches...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lorena Ruiz, Claudio Alba, Cristina García-Carral, Esther A. Jiménez, Kimberly A. Lackey, Michelle K. McGuire, Courtney L. Meehan, James Foster, Daniel W. Sellen, Elizabeth W. Kamau-Mbuthia, Egidioh W. Kamundia, Samwel Mbugua, Sophie E. Moore, Andrew M. Prentice, Debela Gindola K, Gloria E. Otoo, Rossina G. Pareja, Lars Bode, Mark A. McGuire, Janet E. Williams, Juan M. Rodríguez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2021.622550/full
id doaj-d4e02e5fdc7a4457935b428b145367ce
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lorena Ruiz
Claudio Alba
Cristina García-Carral
Esther A. Jiménez
Kimberly A. Lackey
Michelle K. McGuire
Courtney L. Meehan
James Foster
Daniel W. Sellen
Elizabeth W. Kamau-Mbuthia
Egidioh W. Kamundia
Samwel Mbugua
Sophie E. Moore
Sophie E. Moore
Andrew M. Prentice
Debela Gindola K
Gloria E. Otoo
Rossina G. Pareja
Lars Bode
Mark A. McGuire
Janet E. Williams
Juan M. Rodríguez
spellingShingle Lorena Ruiz
Claudio Alba
Cristina García-Carral
Esther A. Jiménez
Kimberly A. Lackey
Michelle K. McGuire
Courtney L. Meehan
James Foster
Daniel W. Sellen
Elizabeth W. Kamau-Mbuthia
Egidioh W. Kamundia
Samwel Mbugua
Sophie E. Moore
Sophie E. Moore
Andrew M. Prentice
Debela Gindola K
Gloria E. Otoo
Rossina G. Pareja
Lars Bode
Mark A. McGuire
Janet E. Williams
Juan M. Rodríguez
Comparison of Two Approaches for the Metataxonomic Analysis of the Human Milk Microbiome
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
human milk
microbiota
16S rRNA
bacteria
sequencing reproducibility
author_facet Lorena Ruiz
Claudio Alba
Cristina García-Carral
Esther A. Jiménez
Kimberly A. Lackey
Michelle K. McGuire
Courtney L. Meehan
James Foster
Daniel W. Sellen
Elizabeth W. Kamau-Mbuthia
Egidioh W. Kamundia
Samwel Mbugua
Sophie E. Moore
Sophie E. Moore
Andrew M. Prentice
Debela Gindola K
Gloria E. Otoo
Rossina G. Pareja
Lars Bode
Mark A. McGuire
Janet E. Williams
Juan M. Rodríguez
author_sort Lorena Ruiz
title Comparison of Two Approaches for the Metataxonomic Analysis of the Human Milk Microbiome
title_short Comparison of Two Approaches for the Metataxonomic Analysis of the Human Milk Microbiome
title_full Comparison of Two Approaches for the Metataxonomic Analysis of the Human Milk Microbiome
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Approaches for the Metataxonomic Analysis of the Human Milk Microbiome
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Approaches for the Metataxonomic Analysis of the Human Milk Microbiome
title_sort comparison of two approaches for the metataxonomic analysis of the human milk microbiome
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
issn 2235-2988
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Recent work has demonstrated the existence of large inter-individual and inter-population variability in the microbiota of human milk from healthy women living across variable geographical and socio-cultural settings. However, no studies have evaluated the impact that variable sequencing approaches targeting different 16S rRNA variable regions may have on the human milk microbiota profiling results. This hampers our ability to make meaningful comparisons across studies. In this context, the main purpose of the present study was to re-process and re-sequence the microbiome in a large set of human milk samples (n = 412) collected from healthy women living at diverse international sites (Spain, Sweden, Peru, United States, Ethiopia, Gambia, Ghana and Kenya), by targeting a different 16S rRNA variable region and reaching a larger sequencing depth. Despite some differences between the results obtained from both sequencing approaches were notable (especially regarding alpha and beta diversities and Proteobacteria representation), results indicate that both sequencing approaches revealed a relatively consistent microbiota configurations in the studied cohorts. Our data expand upon the milk microbiota results we previously reported from the INSPIRE cohort and provide, for the first time across globally diverse populations, evidence of the impact that different DNA processing and sequencing approaches have on the microbiota profiles obtained for human milk samples. Overall, our results corroborate some similarities regarding the microbial communities previously reported for the INSPIRE cohort, but some differences were also detected. Understanding the impact of different sequencing approaches on human milk microbiota profiles is essential to enable meaningful comparisons across studies.Clinical Trial Registrationwww.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02670278.
topic human milk
microbiota
16S rRNA
bacteria
sequencing reproducibility
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2021.622550/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenaruiz comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT claudioalba comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT cristinagarciacarral comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT estherajimenez comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT kimberlyalackey comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT michellekmcguire comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT courtneylmeehan comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT jamesfoster comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT danielwsellen comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT elizabethwkamaumbuthia comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT egidiohwkamundia comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT samwelmbugua comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT sophieemoore comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT sophieemoore comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT andrewmprentice comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT debelagindolak comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT gloriaeotoo comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT rossinagpareja comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT larsbode comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT markamcguire comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT janetewilliams comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
AT juanmrodriguez comparisonoftwoapproachesforthemetataxonomicanalysisofthehumanmilkmicrobiome
_version_ 1724203798938779648
spelling doaj-d4e02e5fdc7a4457935b428b145367ce2021-03-25T06:24:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology2235-29882021-03-011110.3389/fcimb.2021.622550622550Comparison of Two Approaches for the Metataxonomic Analysis of the Human Milk MicrobiomeLorena Ruiz0Claudio Alba1Cristina García-Carral2Esther A. Jiménez3Kimberly A. Lackey4Michelle K. McGuire5Courtney L. Meehan6James Foster7Daniel W. Sellen8Elizabeth W. Kamau-Mbuthia9Egidioh W. Kamundia10Samwel Mbugua11Sophie E. Moore12Sophie E. Moore13Andrew M. Prentice14Debela Gindola K15Gloria E. Otoo16Rossina G. Pareja17Lars Bode18Mark A. McGuire19Janet E. Williams20Juan M. Rodríguez21Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, SpainDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, SpainDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, SpainDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, SpainMargaret Ritchie School of Family and Consumer Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United StatesMargaret Ritchie School of Family and Consumer Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United StatesDepartment of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United StatesMargaret Ritchie School of Family and Consumer Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United StatesDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaDepartment of Human Nutrition, Egerton University, Nakuru, KenyaDepartment of Human Nutrition, Egerton University, Nakuru, KenyaDepartment of Human Nutrition, Egerton University, Nakuru, KenyaDivision of Women’s Health, King’s College London, London, United KingdomMRC Unit, Serekunda, GambiaMRC International Nutrition Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United KingdomDepartment of Anthropology, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia0Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana1Instituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima, Peru2Department of Pediatrics and Larsson-Rosenquist Foundation Mother-Milk-Infant Center of Research Excellence (MOMI CoRE), University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States3Department of Animal and Veterinary Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United States3Department of Animal and Veterinary Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United StatesDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, SpainRecent work has demonstrated the existence of large inter-individual and inter-population variability in the microbiota of human milk from healthy women living across variable geographical and socio-cultural settings. However, no studies have evaluated the impact that variable sequencing approaches targeting different 16S rRNA variable regions may have on the human milk microbiota profiling results. This hampers our ability to make meaningful comparisons across studies. In this context, the main purpose of the present study was to re-process and re-sequence the microbiome in a large set of human milk samples (n = 412) collected from healthy women living at diverse international sites (Spain, Sweden, Peru, United States, Ethiopia, Gambia, Ghana and Kenya), by targeting a different 16S rRNA variable region and reaching a larger sequencing depth. Despite some differences between the results obtained from both sequencing approaches were notable (especially regarding alpha and beta diversities and Proteobacteria representation), results indicate that both sequencing approaches revealed a relatively consistent microbiota configurations in the studied cohorts. Our data expand upon the milk microbiota results we previously reported from the INSPIRE cohort and provide, for the first time across globally diverse populations, evidence of the impact that different DNA processing and sequencing approaches have on the microbiota profiles obtained for human milk samples. Overall, our results corroborate some similarities regarding the microbial communities previously reported for the INSPIRE cohort, but some differences were also detected. Understanding the impact of different sequencing approaches on human milk microbiota profiles is essential to enable meaningful comparisons across studies.Clinical Trial Registrationwww.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02670278.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2021.622550/fullhuman milkmicrobiota16S rRNAbacteriasequencing reproducibility