Effectiveness of anisodamine for the treatment of critically ill patients with septic shock: a multicentre randomized controlled trial

• Main Authors: Yuetian Yu, Cheng Zhu, Yucai Hong, Lin Chen, Zhiping Huang, Jiancang Zhou, Xin Tian, Dadong Liu, Bo Ren, Cao Zhang, Caibao Hu, Xinan Wang, Rui Yin, Yuan Gao, Zhongheng Zhang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2021-09-01
• Series: Critical Care
• Subjects: Septic shock; Anisodamine; Randomized controlled trial; Mortality; Mechanical ventilation
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03774-4

Abstract Background Septic shock is characterized by an uncontrolled inflammatory response and microcirculatory dysfunction. There is currently no specific agent for treating septic shock. Anisodamine is an agent extracted from traditional Chinese medicine with potent anti-inflammatory effects. However, its clinical effectiveness remains largely unknown. Methods In a multicentre, open-label trial, we randomly assigned adults with septic shock to receive either usual care or anisodamine (0.1–0.5 mg per kilogram of body weight per hour), with the anisodamine doses adjusted by clinicians in accordance with the patients’ shock status. The primary end point was death on hospital discharge. The secondary end points were ventilator-free days at 28 days, vasopressor-free days at 28 days, serum lactate and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score from days 0 to 6. The differences in the primary and secondary outcomes were compared between the treatment and usual care groups with the χ 2 test, Student’s t test or rank-sum test, as appropriate. The false discovery rate was controlled for multiple testing. Results Of the 469 patients screened, 355 were assigned to receive the trial drug and were included in the analyses—181 patients received anisodamine, and 174 were in the usual care group. We found no difference between the usual care and anisodamine groups in hospital mortality (36% vs. 30%; p = 0.348), or ventilator-free days (median [Q1, Q3], 24.4 [5.9, 28] vs. 26.0 [8.5, 28]; p = 0.411). The serum lactate levels were significantly lower in the treated group than in the usual care group after day 3. Patients in the treated group were less likely to receive vasopressors than those in the usual care group (OR [95% CI] 0.84 [0.50, 0.93] for day 5 and 0.66 [0.37, 0.95] for day 6). Conclusions There is no evidence that anisodamine can reduce hospital mortality among critically ill adults with septic shock treated in the intensive care unit. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02442440 ; Registered on 13 April 2015).