Field size effects on the risk and severity of treatment-induced lymphopenia in patients undergoing radiation therapy for solid tumors

Purpose: Radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) is the result of direct toxicity to circulating lymphocytes as they traverse the irradiated field, occurs in 40% to 70% of patients who undergo conventional external beam radiation therapy, and is associated with worse outcomes in multiple solid tumors. A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Susannah G. Ellsworth, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-10-01
Series:Advances in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109418301465
Description
Summary:Purpose: Radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) is the result of direct toxicity to circulating lymphocytes as they traverse the irradiated field, occurs in 40% to 70% of patients who undergo conventional external beam radiation therapy, and is associated with worse outcomes in multiple solid tumors. As immunotherapy strategies evolve, a better understanding of radiation's effects on the immune system is needed in order to develop rational methods of combining RT with immunotherapy. Methods and materials: This paper is a review of the available literature on the clinical significance and dosimetric predictors of radiation-induced toxicity to the immune system. Results: An association between severe RIL and inferior survival has been described in multiple solid tumors, including glioma, lung cancer, and pancreatic cancer. RIL risk is correlated with field size, dose per fraction, and fraction number. SBRT and proton therapy techniques are associated with lower RIL risk. Conclusions: The immune system should be considered an organ at risk during RT, and absolute lymphocyte count is an important biomarker of RT-induced immunotoxicity. Radiation dose and technique affect the risk and severity of RIL. Further research is needed to accurately characterize RT-induced immunotoxicity and develop strategies to prevent or mitigate this clinically significant side effect.
ISSN:2452-1094