Reforming solitary confinement: the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing step down reentry program in Oregon

Abstract Background Over the past decade there have been numerous and impassioned calls to reform the practice of solitary confinement in U.S. prisons. This article examines the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing reentry program in the Oregon Department of Correction...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryan M. Labrecque, Jennifer J. Tostlebe, Bert Useem, David C. Pyrooz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-08-01
Series:Health & Justice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-021-00151-9
id doaj-d4fe9742666e4bff8ad17cff857b0933
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d4fe9742666e4bff8ad17cff857b09332021-08-29T11:07:31ZengBMCHealth & Justice2194-78992021-08-019111510.1186/s40352-021-00151-9Reforming solitary confinement: the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing step down reentry program in OregonRyan M. Labrecque0Jennifer J. Tostlebe1Bert Useem2David C. Pyrooz3Department of Criminal Justice, University of Central FloridaDepartment of Sociology, University of Colorado BoulderDepartment of Sociology, Purdue UniversityDepartment of Sociology, University of Colorado BoulderAbstract Background Over the past decade there have been numerous and impassioned calls to reform the practice of solitary confinement in U.S. prisons. This article examines the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing reentry program in the Oregon Department of Corrections. It draws on data from official documents, site observations, and interviews with 12 prison officials and 38 prisoners. The Step Up Program (SUP) seeks to improve the living conditions in restrictive housing over business-as-usual, alleviate physiological and psychological harms of solitary confinement, and use rehabilitative programming to increase success upon returning to the general prison population or community. Results The impetus to change the culture and structure of restrictive housing was primarily the result of internal administrative reform. Prisoners assigned at random to housing assignments offered accounts of their daily activities suggesting that the SUP provides more time out-of-cell and greater access to other services and activities. Program participants preferred the living conditions in the SUP because they had more opportunities for social interaction and incentives for compliant behavior. However, views on the value of programming among respondents were mixed. Conclusions The launch of the SUP occurred in early 2020, which was soon followed by the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, the program was never fully implemented as intended. As Oregon returns to more normal operations, it is possible that the SUP will be able to include even more out-of-cell time, greater socialization opportunities, and increased access to programming and other beneficial activities. As we await the opportunity to conduct prospective psychological and behavioral analyses, this study provides tentative support for the use of step down reentry programs in restrictive housing units. Trial registration Open Science Framework, Preparing adults in custody for successful reentry: An experimental study of a restrictive housing exit program in Oregon. Registered 4 October 2019, https://osf.io/t6qpx/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-021-00151-9PrisonAdministrative segregationRestrictive housingMental and physical health
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ryan M. Labrecque
Jennifer J. Tostlebe
Bert Useem
David C. Pyrooz
spellingShingle Ryan M. Labrecque
Jennifer J. Tostlebe
Bert Useem
David C. Pyrooz
Reforming solitary confinement: the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing step down reentry program in Oregon
Health & Justice
Prison
Administrative segregation
Restrictive housing
Mental and physical health
author_facet Ryan M. Labrecque
Jennifer J. Tostlebe
Bert Useem
David C. Pyrooz
author_sort Ryan M. Labrecque
title Reforming solitary confinement: the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing step down reentry program in Oregon
title_short Reforming solitary confinement: the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing step down reentry program in Oregon
title_full Reforming solitary confinement: the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing step down reentry program in Oregon
title_fullStr Reforming solitary confinement: the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing step down reentry program in Oregon
title_full_unstemmed Reforming solitary confinement: the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing step down reentry program in Oregon
title_sort reforming solitary confinement: the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing step down reentry program in oregon
publisher BMC
series Health & Justice
issn 2194-7899
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Abstract Background Over the past decade there have been numerous and impassioned calls to reform the practice of solitary confinement in U.S. prisons. This article examines the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing reentry program in the Oregon Department of Corrections. It draws on data from official documents, site observations, and interviews with 12 prison officials and 38 prisoners. The Step Up Program (SUP) seeks to improve the living conditions in restrictive housing over business-as-usual, alleviate physiological and psychological harms of solitary confinement, and use rehabilitative programming to increase success upon returning to the general prison population or community. Results The impetus to change the culture and structure of restrictive housing was primarily the result of internal administrative reform. Prisoners assigned at random to housing assignments offered accounts of their daily activities suggesting that the SUP provides more time out-of-cell and greater access to other services and activities. Program participants preferred the living conditions in the SUP because they had more opportunities for social interaction and incentives for compliant behavior. However, views on the value of programming among respondents were mixed. Conclusions The launch of the SUP occurred in early 2020, which was soon followed by the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, the program was never fully implemented as intended. As Oregon returns to more normal operations, it is possible that the SUP will be able to include even more out-of-cell time, greater socialization opportunities, and increased access to programming and other beneficial activities. As we await the opportunity to conduct prospective psychological and behavioral analyses, this study provides tentative support for the use of step down reentry programs in restrictive housing units. Trial registration Open Science Framework, Preparing adults in custody for successful reentry: An experimental study of a restrictive housing exit program in Oregon. Registered 4 October 2019, https://osf.io/t6qpx/
topic Prison
Administrative segregation
Restrictive housing
Mental and physical health
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-021-00151-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanmlabrecque reformingsolitaryconfinementthedevelopmentimplementationandprocessesofarestrictivehousingstepdownreentryprograminoregon
AT jenniferjtostlebe reformingsolitaryconfinementthedevelopmentimplementationandprocessesofarestrictivehousingstepdownreentryprograminoregon
AT bertuseem reformingsolitaryconfinementthedevelopmentimplementationandprocessesofarestrictivehousingstepdownreentryprograminoregon
AT davidcpyrooz reformingsolitaryconfinementthedevelopmentimplementationandprocessesofarestrictivehousingstepdownreentryprograminoregon
_version_ 1721187202113732608