Reforming solitary confinement: the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing step down reentry program in Oregon
Abstract Background Over the past decade there have been numerous and impassioned calls to reform the practice of solitary confinement in U.S. prisons. This article examines the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing reentry program in the Oregon Department of Correction...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Health & Justice |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-021-00151-9 |
id |
doaj-d4fe9742666e4bff8ad17cff857b0933 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d4fe9742666e4bff8ad17cff857b09332021-08-29T11:07:31ZengBMCHealth & Justice2194-78992021-08-019111510.1186/s40352-021-00151-9Reforming solitary confinement: the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing step down reentry program in OregonRyan M. Labrecque0Jennifer J. Tostlebe1Bert Useem2David C. Pyrooz3Department of Criminal Justice, University of Central FloridaDepartment of Sociology, University of Colorado BoulderDepartment of Sociology, Purdue UniversityDepartment of Sociology, University of Colorado BoulderAbstract Background Over the past decade there have been numerous and impassioned calls to reform the practice of solitary confinement in U.S. prisons. This article examines the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing reentry program in the Oregon Department of Corrections. It draws on data from official documents, site observations, and interviews with 12 prison officials and 38 prisoners. The Step Up Program (SUP) seeks to improve the living conditions in restrictive housing over business-as-usual, alleviate physiological and psychological harms of solitary confinement, and use rehabilitative programming to increase success upon returning to the general prison population or community. Results The impetus to change the culture and structure of restrictive housing was primarily the result of internal administrative reform. Prisoners assigned at random to housing assignments offered accounts of their daily activities suggesting that the SUP provides more time out-of-cell and greater access to other services and activities. Program participants preferred the living conditions in the SUP because they had more opportunities for social interaction and incentives for compliant behavior. However, views on the value of programming among respondents were mixed. Conclusions The launch of the SUP occurred in early 2020, which was soon followed by the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, the program was never fully implemented as intended. As Oregon returns to more normal operations, it is possible that the SUP will be able to include even more out-of-cell time, greater socialization opportunities, and increased access to programming and other beneficial activities. As we await the opportunity to conduct prospective psychological and behavioral analyses, this study provides tentative support for the use of step down reentry programs in restrictive housing units. Trial registration Open Science Framework, Preparing adults in custody for successful reentry: An experimental study of a restrictive housing exit program in Oregon. Registered 4 October 2019, https://osf.io/t6qpx/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-021-00151-9PrisonAdministrative segregationRestrictive housingMental and physical health |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ryan M. Labrecque Jennifer J. Tostlebe Bert Useem David C. Pyrooz |
spellingShingle |
Ryan M. Labrecque Jennifer J. Tostlebe Bert Useem David C. Pyrooz Reforming solitary confinement: the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing step down reentry program in Oregon Health & Justice Prison Administrative segregation Restrictive housing Mental and physical health |
author_facet |
Ryan M. Labrecque Jennifer J. Tostlebe Bert Useem David C. Pyrooz |
author_sort |
Ryan M. Labrecque |
title |
Reforming solitary confinement: the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing step down reentry program in Oregon |
title_short |
Reforming solitary confinement: the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing step down reentry program in Oregon |
title_full |
Reforming solitary confinement: the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing step down reentry program in Oregon |
title_fullStr |
Reforming solitary confinement: the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing step down reentry program in Oregon |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reforming solitary confinement: the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing step down reentry program in Oregon |
title_sort |
reforming solitary confinement: the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing step down reentry program in oregon |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Health & Justice |
issn |
2194-7899 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Over the past decade there have been numerous and impassioned calls to reform the practice of solitary confinement in U.S. prisons. This article examines the development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing reentry program in the Oregon Department of Corrections. It draws on data from official documents, site observations, and interviews with 12 prison officials and 38 prisoners. The Step Up Program (SUP) seeks to improve the living conditions in restrictive housing over business-as-usual, alleviate physiological and psychological harms of solitary confinement, and use rehabilitative programming to increase success upon returning to the general prison population or community. Results The impetus to change the culture and structure of restrictive housing was primarily the result of internal administrative reform. Prisoners assigned at random to housing assignments offered accounts of their daily activities suggesting that the SUP provides more time out-of-cell and greater access to other services and activities. Program participants preferred the living conditions in the SUP because they had more opportunities for social interaction and incentives for compliant behavior. However, views on the value of programming among respondents were mixed. Conclusions The launch of the SUP occurred in early 2020, which was soon followed by the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, the program was never fully implemented as intended. As Oregon returns to more normal operations, it is possible that the SUP will be able to include even more out-of-cell time, greater socialization opportunities, and increased access to programming and other beneficial activities. As we await the opportunity to conduct prospective psychological and behavioral analyses, this study provides tentative support for the use of step down reentry programs in restrictive housing units. Trial registration Open Science Framework, Preparing adults in custody for successful reentry: An experimental study of a restrictive housing exit program in Oregon. Registered 4 October 2019, https://osf.io/t6qpx/ |
topic |
Prison Administrative segregation Restrictive housing Mental and physical health |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-021-00151-9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ryanmlabrecque reformingsolitaryconfinementthedevelopmentimplementationandprocessesofarestrictivehousingstepdownreentryprograminoregon AT jenniferjtostlebe reformingsolitaryconfinementthedevelopmentimplementationandprocessesofarestrictivehousingstepdownreentryprograminoregon AT bertuseem reformingsolitaryconfinementthedevelopmentimplementationandprocessesofarestrictivehousingstepdownreentryprograminoregon AT davidcpyrooz reformingsolitaryconfinementthedevelopmentimplementationandprocessesofarestrictivehousingstepdownreentryprograminoregon |
_version_ |
1721187202113732608 |