Three, two, one! Revision of the long-bodied sphaerodorids (Sphaerodoridae, Annelida) and synonymization of Ephesiella, Ephesiopsis and Sphaerodorum

Background Long-bodied sphaerodorids (Annelida, Sphaerodoridae) is the common name for members of the three closely and morphologically homogenous currently accepted genera of benthic marine bristle worms: Ephesiella, Ephesiopsis and Sphaerodorum. Members of this group share the presence of two dors...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: María Capa, Torkild Bakken, Karin Meißner, Arne Nygren
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2018-10-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/5783.pdf
id doaj-d51637f609834659ba9f346ee8790ceb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d51637f609834659ba9f346ee8790ceb2020-11-25T01:31:17ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592018-10-016e578310.7717/peerj.5783Three, two, one! Revision of the long-bodied sphaerodorids (Sphaerodoridae, Annelida) and synonymization of Ephesiella, Ephesiopsis and SphaerodorumMaría Capa0Torkild Bakken1Karin Meißner2Arne Nygren3Department of Biology, University of the Balearic Islands, Palma, SpainNTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NorwayForschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Deutsches Zentrum für Marine Biodiversitätsforschung, Hamburg, GermanySjöfartsmuseet Akvariet, Göteborg, SwedenBackground Long-bodied sphaerodorids (Annelida, Sphaerodoridae) is the common name for members of the three closely and morphologically homogenous currently accepted genera of benthic marine bristle worms: Ephesiella, Ephesiopsis and Sphaerodorum. Members of this group share the presence of two dorsal and longitudinal rows of macrotubercles with terminal papillae, and two longitudinal rows of microtubercles, features that are unique among sphaerodorids. Genera are distinguished by the chaetae morphology. Members of Ephesiella are characterised by having compound chaetae (except, sometimes, simple chaetae in the first chaetigers), Sphaerodorum bear only simple chaetae, and Ephesiopsis have both compound and simple chaetae in all parapodia. Methods Mitochondrial (partial COI and 16S rDNA) and nuclear (partial 18S rDNA and 28S rDNA) sequence data of long-bodied sphaerodorids with compound and simple chaetae, and an outgroup of additional seven sphaerodorid species were analysed separately and in combination using Bayesian inference (BA), and Maximum Likelihood (ML) methods. Long-bodied sphaerodorids from around the world (including type specimens) were examined under a range of optical equipment in order to evaluate putative generic and specific diagnostic features, in addition to intraspecific variability. Results Phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences of specimens identified as Ephesiella and Sphaerodorum, based on chaeta morphology, were performed. Sphaerodorum and Ephesiella were recovered as paraphyletic and nested within each other. Revision of current nominal species diagnostic features are performed and discussed. Discussion Results contradict current generic definitions. Recovery of paraphyletic compound and simple chaetae clades urge the synonymization of these two genera of long-bodied sphaerodorids. Morphological data also suggest the synonymization of Ephesiopsis.https://peerj.com/articles/5783.pdfDiagnostic featuresPolychaetesMorphologyMolecular phylogenyReciprocal monophylySystematics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author María Capa
Torkild Bakken
Karin Meißner
Arne Nygren
spellingShingle María Capa
Torkild Bakken
Karin Meißner
Arne Nygren
Three, two, one! Revision of the long-bodied sphaerodorids (Sphaerodoridae, Annelida) and synonymization of Ephesiella, Ephesiopsis and Sphaerodorum
PeerJ
Diagnostic features
Polychaetes
Morphology
Molecular phylogeny
Reciprocal monophyly
Systematics
author_facet María Capa
Torkild Bakken
Karin Meißner
Arne Nygren
author_sort María Capa
title Three, two, one! Revision of the long-bodied sphaerodorids (Sphaerodoridae, Annelida) and synonymization of Ephesiella, Ephesiopsis and Sphaerodorum
title_short Three, two, one! Revision of the long-bodied sphaerodorids (Sphaerodoridae, Annelida) and synonymization of Ephesiella, Ephesiopsis and Sphaerodorum
title_full Three, two, one! Revision of the long-bodied sphaerodorids (Sphaerodoridae, Annelida) and synonymization of Ephesiella, Ephesiopsis and Sphaerodorum
title_fullStr Three, two, one! Revision of the long-bodied sphaerodorids (Sphaerodoridae, Annelida) and synonymization of Ephesiella, Ephesiopsis and Sphaerodorum
title_full_unstemmed Three, two, one! Revision of the long-bodied sphaerodorids (Sphaerodoridae, Annelida) and synonymization of Ephesiella, Ephesiopsis and Sphaerodorum
title_sort three, two, one! revision of the long-bodied sphaerodorids (sphaerodoridae, annelida) and synonymization of ephesiella, ephesiopsis and sphaerodorum
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Background Long-bodied sphaerodorids (Annelida, Sphaerodoridae) is the common name for members of the three closely and morphologically homogenous currently accepted genera of benthic marine bristle worms: Ephesiella, Ephesiopsis and Sphaerodorum. Members of this group share the presence of two dorsal and longitudinal rows of macrotubercles with terminal papillae, and two longitudinal rows of microtubercles, features that are unique among sphaerodorids. Genera are distinguished by the chaetae morphology. Members of Ephesiella are characterised by having compound chaetae (except, sometimes, simple chaetae in the first chaetigers), Sphaerodorum bear only simple chaetae, and Ephesiopsis have both compound and simple chaetae in all parapodia. Methods Mitochondrial (partial COI and 16S rDNA) and nuclear (partial 18S rDNA and 28S rDNA) sequence data of long-bodied sphaerodorids with compound and simple chaetae, and an outgroup of additional seven sphaerodorid species were analysed separately and in combination using Bayesian inference (BA), and Maximum Likelihood (ML) methods. Long-bodied sphaerodorids from around the world (including type specimens) were examined under a range of optical equipment in order to evaluate putative generic and specific diagnostic features, in addition to intraspecific variability. Results Phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences of specimens identified as Ephesiella and Sphaerodorum, based on chaeta morphology, were performed. Sphaerodorum and Ephesiella were recovered as paraphyletic and nested within each other. Revision of current nominal species diagnostic features are performed and discussed. Discussion Results contradict current generic definitions. Recovery of paraphyletic compound and simple chaetae clades urge the synonymization of these two genera of long-bodied sphaerodorids. Morphological data also suggest the synonymization of Ephesiopsis.
topic Diagnostic features
Polychaetes
Morphology
Molecular phylogeny
Reciprocal monophyly
Systematics
url https://peerj.com/articles/5783.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mariacapa threetwoonerevisionofthelongbodiedsphaerodoridssphaerodoridaeannelidaandsynonymizationofephesiellaephesiopsisandsphaerodorum
AT torkildbakken threetwoonerevisionofthelongbodiedsphaerodoridssphaerodoridaeannelidaandsynonymizationofephesiellaephesiopsisandsphaerodorum
AT karinmeißner threetwoonerevisionofthelongbodiedsphaerodoridssphaerodoridaeannelidaandsynonymizationofephesiellaephesiopsisandsphaerodorum
AT arnenygren threetwoonerevisionofthelongbodiedsphaerodoridssphaerodoridaeannelidaandsynonymizationofephesiellaephesiopsisandsphaerodorum
_version_ 1725087630404616192