Peer review in PLoS Medicine.

Peer review in PLoS Medicine.

Bibliographic Details
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2007-01-01
Series:	PLoS Medicine
Online Access:	http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1790720?pdf=render

Similar Items

PLoS Medicine.
by: Barbara Cohen
Published: (2004-02-01)

Engaging students in PLoS Medicine.
Published: (2005-04-01)

PLoS Medicine and the pharmaceutical industry.
by: PLoS Medicine Editors
Published: (2006-07-01)

The PLoS community journals.
by: Mark Patterson, et al.
Published: (2005-04-01)

PLoS Biology in action.
by: Barbara Cohen
Published: (2004-01-01)

The impact of PLoS pathogens.
by: John Young, et al.
Published: (2007-09-01)

Introducing PLoS Genetics.
Published: (2005-07-01)

Introducing PLoS Genetics.
by: Wayne N Frankel
Published: (2005-07-01)

PLoS Medicine's Advisory Group on Publication Ethics.
by: PLoS Medicine Editors
Published: (2007-02-01)

PLoS Medicine and publication ethics: when is it research?
by: Mary Ann Baily
Published: (2007-04-01)

Applause to PLoS Medicine for Initiating Student Forum.
Published: (2005-07-01)

PLoS Biology 2.0.
by: Jonathan A Eisen
Published: (2008-02-01)

PLoS Pathogens at three years.
by: Kasturi Haldar, et al.
Published: (2008-01-01)

How does PLoS medicine manage competing interests?
Published: (2005-03-01)

PLoS Medicine— A Medical Journal for the Internet Age.
by: Michael B Eisen, et al.
Published: (2004-10-01)

Some tolerance for fur--animal studies in PLoS Medicine.
Published: (2005-06-01)

A Review of 2009 for PLoS Computational Biology
by: Rosemary Dickin, et al.
Published: (2010-02-01)

A Review of 2008 for PLoS Computational Biology.
by: Evie Browne, et al.
Published: (2009-01-01)

A Review of 2010 for PLoS Computational Biology.
by: Rosemary Dickin, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01)

Better reporting, better research: guidelines and guidance in PLoS Medicine.
by: PLoS Medicine Editors
Published: (2008-04-01)

Why PLoS became a publisher.
by: Patrick O Brown, et al.
Published: (2003-10-01)

ONE for all: the next step for PLoS.
by: Catriona J MacCallum
Published: (2006-11-01)

PLoS biology--we're open.
by: Philip Bernstein, et al.
Published: (2003-10-01)

One year of PLoS Computational Biology.
Published: (2006-08-01)

PLoS takes a step backward.
by: John J Pippin
Published: (2005-08-01)

Change in the editorial leadership of PLoS Pathogens.
by: Kasturi Haldar, et al.
Published: (2008-01-01)

PLoS takes a step backward.
Published: (2005-08-01)

Open access: a PLoS for education.
by: A Malcolm Campbell
Published: (2004-05-01)

PLoS Medicine series on Big Food: the food industry is ripe for scrutiny.
by: PLoS Medicine Editors
Published: (2012-01-01)

How Does <italic>PLoS Medicine</italic> Manage Competing Interests?
Published: (2005-01-01)

The Evolving Scope of PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
by: Peter J. Hotez, et al.
Published: (2009-02-01)

Why provide an opinions section in PLoS pathogens?
by: Marianne Manchester
Published: (2005-09-01)

Why Provide an Opinions Section in PLoS Pathogens?
Published: (2005-09-01)

PLoS Biology at 5: the future is open access.
by: Theodora Bloom, et al.
Published: (2008-10-01)

Genomics of emerging infectious disease: A PLoS collection.
by: Jonathan A Eisen, et al.
Published: (2009-10-01)

Topic pages: PLoS Computational Biology meets Wikipedia.
by: Shoshana J Wodak, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01)

Why PLoS sponsored a roundtable of medical whistleblowers.
Published: (2005-07-01)

PLoS Computational Biology: a new community journal.
by: Philip E Bourne, et al.
Published: (2005-06-01)

PLoS Computational Biology: A New Community Journal.
Published: (2005-06-01)

Why PLoS sponsored a roundtable of medical whistleblowers.
Published: (2005-07-01)