Innovative Administrative Procedure Law: Mission Impossible ?

Law and innovation are oft en seen as antagonistic notions, particularly in administrative (authoritative) relations. Th is paper addresses this issue based on the regulation of administrative procedures, since they represent core public-administration activities in contemporary society. Hence, they...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kovač Polonca
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2017-12-01
Series:NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
Subjects:
law
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2017-0013
id doaj-d535404a437242cd9eb1a0c6f95d7811
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d535404a437242cd9eb1a0c6f95d78112021-09-06T19:21:05ZengSciendoNISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy1337-90381338-43092017-12-011029311710.1515/nispa-2017-0013nispa-2017-0013Innovative Administrative Procedure Law: Mission Impossible ?Kovač PoloncaLaw and innovation are oft en seen as antagonistic notions, particularly in administrative (authoritative) relations. Th is paper addresses this issue based on the regulation of administrative procedures, since they represent core public-administration activities in contemporary society. Hence, they need to be codified and implemented, both on the EU and national levels, in a more flexible and party-oriented way, even though still preserving legal certainty. The author argues that Europeanisation contributes to innovation in administrative procedure law, with institutions such as alternative dispute resolution or one-stop-shops. In order to explore the potential drivers of and barriers to innovation, particularly in Eastern Europe, a survey and several structured interviews were carried out in Slovenia as a case study. Th e results reveal that the culture in the region is legalistically driven and thus hinders innovation, even that which has already been introduced in the law. Consequently, a key obstacle to be addressed in future measures is the mind-set in public administration rather than a pure legal change.https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2017-0013innovationlawadministrative procedureseuropeanisationpublic administrationslovenia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kovač Polonca
spellingShingle Kovač Polonca
Innovative Administrative Procedure Law: Mission Impossible ?
NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
innovation
law
administrative procedures
europeanisation
public administration
slovenia
author_facet Kovač Polonca
author_sort Kovač Polonca
title Innovative Administrative Procedure Law: Mission Impossible ?
title_short Innovative Administrative Procedure Law: Mission Impossible ?
title_full Innovative Administrative Procedure Law: Mission Impossible ?
title_fullStr Innovative Administrative Procedure Law: Mission Impossible ?
title_full_unstemmed Innovative Administrative Procedure Law: Mission Impossible ?
title_sort innovative administrative procedure law: mission impossible ?
publisher Sciendo
series NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
issn 1337-9038
1338-4309
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Law and innovation are oft en seen as antagonistic notions, particularly in administrative (authoritative) relations. Th is paper addresses this issue based on the regulation of administrative procedures, since they represent core public-administration activities in contemporary society. Hence, they need to be codified and implemented, both on the EU and national levels, in a more flexible and party-oriented way, even though still preserving legal certainty. The author argues that Europeanisation contributes to innovation in administrative procedure law, with institutions such as alternative dispute resolution or one-stop-shops. In order to explore the potential drivers of and barriers to innovation, particularly in Eastern Europe, a survey and several structured interviews were carried out in Slovenia as a case study. Th e results reveal that the culture in the region is legalistically driven and thus hinders innovation, even that which has already been introduced in the law. Consequently, a key obstacle to be addressed in future measures is the mind-set in public administration rather than a pure legal change.
topic innovation
law
administrative procedures
europeanisation
public administration
slovenia
url https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2017-0013
work_keys_str_mv AT kovacpolonca innovativeadministrativeprocedurelawmissionimpossible
_version_ 1717775212332711936