Efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial

Abstract Background A 12-week, double-blind, parallel, multi-center randomized controlled trial in 316 adult patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing for drug therapy guidance. Methods Patients with a CGI-S ≥ 4 and req...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Víctor Pérez, Ariana Salavert, Jordi Espadaler, Miquel Tuson, Jerónimo Saiz-Ruiz, Cristina Sáez-Navarro, Julio Bobes, Enrique Baca-García, Eduard Vieta, José M. Olivares, Roberto Rodriguez-Jimenez, José M. Villagrán, Josep Gascón, Josep Cañete-Crespillo, Montse Solé, Pilar A. Saiz, Ángela Ibáñez, Javier de Diego-Adeliño, AB-GEN Collaborative Group, José M. Menchón
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-07-01
Series:BMC Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12888-017-1412-1
id doaj-d5844f200b4f4f299135845fb3c486c5
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Víctor Pérez
Ariana Salavert
Jordi Espadaler
Miquel Tuson
Jerónimo Saiz-Ruiz
Cristina Sáez-Navarro
Julio Bobes
Enrique Baca-García
Eduard Vieta
José M. Olivares
Roberto Rodriguez-Jimenez
José M. Villagrán
Josep Gascón
Josep Cañete-Crespillo
Montse Solé
Pilar A. Saiz
Ángela Ibáñez
Javier de Diego-Adeliño
AB-GEN Collaborative Group
José M. Menchón
spellingShingle Víctor Pérez
Ariana Salavert
Jordi Espadaler
Miquel Tuson
Jerónimo Saiz-Ruiz
Cristina Sáez-Navarro
Julio Bobes
Enrique Baca-García
Eduard Vieta
José M. Olivares
Roberto Rodriguez-Jimenez
José M. Villagrán
Josep Gascón
Josep Cañete-Crespillo
Montse Solé
Pilar A. Saiz
Ángela Ibáñez
Javier de Diego-Adeliño
AB-GEN Collaborative Group
José M. Menchón
Efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial
BMC Psychiatry
Depression
Pharmacogenetics
Precision medicine
Antidepressant response
Randomized clinical trial
author_facet Víctor Pérez
Ariana Salavert
Jordi Espadaler
Miquel Tuson
Jerónimo Saiz-Ruiz
Cristina Sáez-Navarro
Julio Bobes
Enrique Baca-García
Eduard Vieta
José M. Olivares
Roberto Rodriguez-Jimenez
José M. Villagrán
Josep Gascón
Josep Cañete-Crespillo
Montse Solé
Pilar A. Saiz
Ángela Ibáñez
Javier de Diego-Adeliño
AB-GEN Collaborative Group
José M. Menchón
author_sort Víctor Pérez
title Efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial
title_short Efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial
title_full Efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial
title_sort efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial
publisher BMC
series BMC Psychiatry
issn 1471-244X
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Abstract Background A 12-week, double-blind, parallel, multi-center randomized controlled trial in 316 adult patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing for drug therapy guidance. Methods Patients with a CGI-S ≥ 4 and requiring antidepressant medication de novo or changes in their medication regime were recruited at 18 Spanish public hospitals, genotyped with a commercial PGx panel (Neuropharmagen®), and randomized to PGx-guided treatment (n = 155) or treatment as usual (TAU, control group, n = 161), using a computer-generated random list that locked or unlocked psychiatrist access to the results of the PGx panel depending on group allocation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a sustained response (Patient Global Impression of Improvement, PGI-I ≤ 2) within the 12-week follow-up. Patients and interviewers collecting the PGI-I ratings were blinded to group allocation. Between-group differences were evaluated using χ2-test or t-test, as per data type. Results Two hundred eighty patients were available for analysis at the end of the 12-week follow-up (PGx n = 136, TAU n = 144). A difference in sustained response within the study period (primary outcome) was not observed (38.5% vs 34.4%, p = 0.4735; OR = 1.19 [95%CI 0.74-1.92]), but the PGx-guided treatment group had a higher responder rate compared to TAU at 12 weeks (47.8% vs 36.1%, p = 0.0476; OR = 1.62 [95%CI 1.00-2.61]), and this difference increased after removing subjects in the PGx-guided group when clinicians explicitly reported not to follow the test recommendations (51.3% vs 36.1%, p = 0.0135; OR = 1.86 [95%CI 1.13-3.05]). Effects were more consistent in patients with 1–3 failed drug trials. In subjects reporting side effects burden at baseline, odds of achieving a better tolerability (Frequency, Intensity and Burden of Side Effects Rating Burden subscore ≤2) were higher in the PGx-guided group than in controls at 6 weeks and maintained at 12 weeks (68.5% vs 51.4%, p = 0.0260; OR = 2.06 [95%CI 1.09-3.89]). Conclusions PGx-guided treatment resulted in significant improvement of MDD patient’s response at 12 weeks, dependent on the number of previously failed medication trials, but not on sustained response during the study period. Burden of side effects was also significantly reduced. Trial registration European Clinical Trials Database 2013-002228-18 , registration date September 16, 2013; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02529462 , retrospectively registered: August 19, 2015.
topic Depression
Pharmacogenetics
Precision medicine
Antidepressant response
Randomized clinical trial
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12888-017-1412-1
work_keys_str_mv AT victorperez efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT arianasalavert efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT jordiespadaler efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT miqueltuson efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT jeronimosaizruiz efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT cristinasaeznavarro efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT juliobobes efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT enriquebacagarcia efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT eduardvieta efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT josemolivares efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT robertorodriguezjimenez efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT josemvillagran efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT josepgascon efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT josepcanetecrespillo efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT montsesole efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT pilarasaiz efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT angelaibanez efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT javierdediegoadelino efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT abgencollaborativegroup efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT josemmenchon efficacyofprospectivepharmacogenetictestinginthetreatmentofmajordepressivedisorderresultsofarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
_version_ 1724817103063613440
spelling doaj-d5844f200b4f4f299135845fb3c486c52020-11-25T02:32:52ZengBMCBMC Psychiatry1471-244X2017-07-0117111310.1186/s12888-017-1412-1Efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trialVíctor Pérez0Ariana Salavert1Jordi Espadaler2Miquel Tuson3Jerónimo Saiz-Ruiz4Cristina Sáez-Navarro5Julio Bobes6Enrique Baca-García7Eduard Vieta8José M. Olivares9Roberto Rodriguez-Jimenez10José M. Villagrán11Josep Gascón12Josep Cañete-Crespillo13Montse Solé14Pilar A. Saiz15Ángela Ibáñez16Javier de Diego-Adeliño17AB-GEN Collaborative GroupJosé M. Menchón18Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM)AB-Biotics, S. AAB-Biotics, S. AAB-Biotics, S. ACentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM)Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM)Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM)Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM)Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM)Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Instituto Biomédico Galicia SurCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM)Psychiatric Hospitalization Unit, Hospital General de Jerez de la FronteraPsychiatric Unit, Hospital Universitari Mútua TerrassaMental Health Department, Hospital de Mataró, Consorci Sanitari del MaresmeCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM)Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM)Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM)Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM)Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM)Abstract Background A 12-week, double-blind, parallel, multi-center randomized controlled trial in 316 adult patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing for drug therapy guidance. Methods Patients with a CGI-S ≥ 4 and requiring antidepressant medication de novo or changes in their medication regime were recruited at 18 Spanish public hospitals, genotyped with a commercial PGx panel (Neuropharmagen®), and randomized to PGx-guided treatment (n = 155) or treatment as usual (TAU, control group, n = 161), using a computer-generated random list that locked or unlocked psychiatrist access to the results of the PGx panel depending on group allocation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a sustained response (Patient Global Impression of Improvement, PGI-I ≤ 2) within the 12-week follow-up. Patients and interviewers collecting the PGI-I ratings were blinded to group allocation. Between-group differences were evaluated using χ2-test or t-test, as per data type. Results Two hundred eighty patients were available for analysis at the end of the 12-week follow-up (PGx n = 136, TAU n = 144). A difference in sustained response within the study period (primary outcome) was not observed (38.5% vs 34.4%, p = 0.4735; OR = 1.19 [95%CI 0.74-1.92]), but the PGx-guided treatment group had a higher responder rate compared to TAU at 12 weeks (47.8% vs 36.1%, p = 0.0476; OR = 1.62 [95%CI 1.00-2.61]), and this difference increased after removing subjects in the PGx-guided group when clinicians explicitly reported not to follow the test recommendations (51.3% vs 36.1%, p = 0.0135; OR = 1.86 [95%CI 1.13-3.05]). Effects were more consistent in patients with 1–3 failed drug trials. In subjects reporting side effects burden at baseline, odds of achieving a better tolerability (Frequency, Intensity and Burden of Side Effects Rating Burden subscore ≤2) were higher in the PGx-guided group than in controls at 6 weeks and maintained at 12 weeks (68.5% vs 51.4%, p = 0.0260; OR = 2.06 [95%CI 1.09-3.89]). Conclusions PGx-guided treatment resulted in significant improvement of MDD patient’s response at 12 weeks, dependent on the number of previously failed medication trials, but not on sustained response during the study period. Burden of side effects was also significantly reduced. Trial registration European Clinical Trials Database 2013-002228-18 , registration date September 16, 2013; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02529462 , retrospectively registered: August 19, 2015.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12888-017-1412-1DepressionPharmacogeneticsPrecision medicineAntidepressant responseRandomized clinical trial