Rate of retraction of anterior teeth after canine distraction

Background and Objectives: Orthodontists have always strived to develop a new technique to reduce the treatment time with minimal patient cooperation. Canine distraction was introduced as an alternative technique for canine retraction in a minimum possible period of 3 weeks, thus avoiding taxing the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Litesh Singla, Divya Singla
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dental Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijds.in/article.asp?issn=0976-4003;year=2017;volume=9;issue=4;spage=261;epage=265;aulast=Singla
id doaj-d5d31b6024a24e589edf54ceee507581
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d5d31b6024a24e589edf54ceee5075812020-11-24T23:46:30ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Sciences0976-40032017-01-019426126510.4103/IJDS.IJDS_94_17Rate of retraction of anterior teeth after canine distractionLitesh SinglaDivya SinglaBackground and Objectives: Orthodontists have always strived to develop a new technique to reduce the treatment time with minimal patient cooperation. Canine distraction was introduced as an alternative technique for canine retraction in a minimum possible period of 3 weeks, thus avoiding taxing the anchorage by molars since the canines are retracted within the lag phase of molars. It has been proved by numerous studies that the bone mesial to canine after rapid canine distraction through the extraction socket is a new and immature. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the rate of retraction of anterior teeth, the time taken, and anchorage loss during the retraction of anterior teeth into this newly organized bone. Methods: Six orthodontic patients who required first premolar extractions were selected. Undermining of the interseptal bone distal to the canine was done, and canines were retracted into the extraction space of the first premolar, using a custom-made tooth borne intraoral distraction screw, following which the incisors were retracted into the newly formed bone using closing loops. The patients were called at weekly intervals to measure the amount of space left between canine and lateral incisor, and the rate of retraction was calculated after space was closed. Results: The present study showed that the rate of retraction of mandibular and maxillary teeth was 0.74 ± 0.39 mm and 0.73 ± 0.15 mm/week, respectively. The anchorage loss was found to be 1.83 ± 0.29 mm and 2.08 ± 0.38 mm in mandibular and maxillary arches, respectively. The time taken to retract the incisors was found to be 40.3 ± 1.5 and 41.7 ± 0.6 days for mandibular and maxillary arches, respectively. Interpretation and Conclusion: Retraction of incisors is faster in both maxillary and mandibular arches when the incisors are retracted immediately into the immature bone created after canine distraction.http://www.ijds.in/article.asp?issn=0976-4003;year=2017;volume=9;issue=4;spage=261;epage=265;aulast=SinglaCanine distractiondistraction screwretraction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Litesh Singla
Divya Singla
spellingShingle Litesh Singla
Divya Singla
Rate of retraction of anterior teeth after canine distraction
Indian Journal of Dental Sciences
Canine distraction
distraction screw
retraction
author_facet Litesh Singla
Divya Singla
author_sort Litesh Singla
title Rate of retraction of anterior teeth after canine distraction
title_short Rate of retraction of anterior teeth after canine distraction
title_full Rate of retraction of anterior teeth after canine distraction
title_fullStr Rate of retraction of anterior teeth after canine distraction
title_full_unstemmed Rate of retraction of anterior teeth after canine distraction
title_sort rate of retraction of anterior teeth after canine distraction
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Dental Sciences
issn 0976-4003
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Background and Objectives: Orthodontists have always strived to develop a new technique to reduce the treatment time with minimal patient cooperation. Canine distraction was introduced as an alternative technique for canine retraction in a minimum possible period of 3 weeks, thus avoiding taxing the anchorage by molars since the canines are retracted within the lag phase of molars. It has been proved by numerous studies that the bone mesial to canine after rapid canine distraction through the extraction socket is a new and immature. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the rate of retraction of anterior teeth, the time taken, and anchorage loss during the retraction of anterior teeth into this newly organized bone. Methods: Six orthodontic patients who required first premolar extractions were selected. Undermining of the interseptal bone distal to the canine was done, and canines were retracted into the extraction space of the first premolar, using a custom-made tooth borne intraoral distraction screw, following which the incisors were retracted into the newly formed bone using closing loops. The patients were called at weekly intervals to measure the amount of space left between canine and lateral incisor, and the rate of retraction was calculated after space was closed. Results: The present study showed that the rate of retraction of mandibular and maxillary teeth was 0.74 ± 0.39 mm and 0.73 ± 0.15 mm/week, respectively. The anchorage loss was found to be 1.83 ± 0.29 mm and 2.08 ± 0.38 mm in mandibular and maxillary arches, respectively. The time taken to retract the incisors was found to be 40.3 ± 1.5 and 41.7 ± 0.6 days for mandibular and maxillary arches, respectively. Interpretation and Conclusion: Retraction of incisors is faster in both maxillary and mandibular arches when the incisors are retracted immediately into the immature bone created after canine distraction.
topic Canine distraction
distraction screw
retraction
url http://www.ijds.in/article.asp?issn=0976-4003;year=2017;volume=9;issue=4;spage=261;epage=265;aulast=Singla
work_keys_str_mv AT liteshsingla rateofretractionofanteriorteethaftercaninedistraction
AT divyasingla rateofretractionofanteriorteethaftercaninedistraction
_version_ 1725493513522511872