Puzzling Politics: A Methodology for Turning World-Systems Analysis Inside-Out

Can world-systems analysis illuminate politics? Can it help explain why illiberal regimes, outsider parties, and anti-immigrant rhetoric seem to be on the rise? Can it help explain any such nationalchanges that seem destined to shift how nations relate to world markets? Leading surveys of historical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leslie C. Gates, Mehmet Deniz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2019-03-01
Series:Journal of World-Systems Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/667
id doaj-d5d6d270d2584cf7ba703d220f0e84fe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d5d6d270d2584cf7ba703d220f0e84fe2020-11-25T02:19:02ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghJournal of World-Systems Research1076-156X2019-03-01251598210.5195/jwsr.2019.667778Puzzling Politics: A Methodology for Turning World-Systems Analysis Inside-OutLeslie C. Gates0Mehmet Deniz1SUNY-BinghamtonSUNY-BinghamtonCan world-systems analysis illuminate politics? Can it help explain why illiberal regimes, outsider parties, and anti-immigrant rhetoric seem to be on the rise? Can it help explain any such nationalchanges that seem destined to shift how nations relate to world markets? Leading surveys of historical sociology seem to say no. We disagree. While there are problems with Wallerstein’s early mode of analyzing politicsin the capitalist world-system from the outside-in, historical sociologists have been too quick to dismiss world-systems analysis. We propose an alternative inside-out approach anchored in a methodology for selecting what to study: those national political transformations which constitute puzzling instances within a given world-historical political process. We recommend promising theoretical lineages to guide empirical research on the selected puzzle: those that specify the elite social bases of politics. We thereby  turn  world-systems  analysis  inside-out.  Our  inside-out  approach  advances  the  project  of  world-systems analysis as a methodology, rather than a theoretical prescription in several ways. First, it addresses an important but largely overlooked question: how to select what to study. Second, it devises a methodology that can, but does not have to, pair with the methodology of incorporated comparisons. Third, it offers a methodology that stimulates, rather than forecloses, theoretical flexibility and fresh interpretations of politics and the world-economy. We illustrate the strengths of this new approach with three books, two of which won the best book award from ASA’s Political Economy of the World System (PEWS) Section.http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/667National political transformationWorld-historical methodology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leslie C. Gates
Mehmet Deniz
spellingShingle Leslie C. Gates
Mehmet Deniz
Puzzling Politics: A Methodology for Turning World-Systems Analysis Inside-Out
Journal of World-Systems Research
National political transformation
World-historical methodology
author_facet Leslie C. Gates
Mehmet Deniz
author_sort Leslie C. Gates
title Puzzling Politics: A Methodology for Turning World-Systems Analysis Inside-Out
title_short Puzzling Politics: A Methodology for Turning World-Systems Analysis Inside-Out
title_full Puzzling Politics: A Methodology for Turning World-Systems Analysis Inside-Out
title_fullStr Puzzling Politics: A Methodology for Turning World-Systems Analysis Inside-Out
title_full_unstemmed Puzzling Politics: A Methodology for Turning World-Systems Analysis Inside-Out
title_sort puzzling politics: a methodology for turning world-systems analysis inside-out
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series Journal of World-Systems Research
issn 1076-156X
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Can world-systems analysis illuminate politics? Can it help explain why illiberal regimes, outsider parties, and anti-immigrant rhetoric seem to be on the rise? Can it help explain any such nationalchanges that seem destined to shift how nations relate to world markets? Leading surveys of historical sociology seem to say no. We disagree. While there are problems with Wallerstein’s early mode of analyzing politicsin the capitalist world-system from the outside-in, historical sociologists have been too quick to dismiss world-systems analysis. We propose an alternative inside-out approach anchored in a methodology for selecting what to study: those national political transformations which constitute puzzling instances within a given world-historical political process. We recommend promising theoretical lineages to guide empirical research on the selected puzzle: those that specify the elite social bases of politics. We thereby  turn  world-systems  analysis  inside-out.  Our  inside-out  approach  advances  the  project  of  world-systems analysis as a methodology, rather than a theoretical prescription in several ways. First, it addresses an important but largely overlooked question: how to select what to study. Second, it devises a methodology that can, but does not have to, pair with the methodology of incorporated comparisons. Third, it offers a methodology that stimulates, rather than forecloses, theoretical flexibility and fresh interpretations of politics and the world-economy. We illustrate the strengths of this new approach with three books, two of which won the best book award from ASA’s Political Economy of the World System (PEWS) Section.
topic National political transformation
World-historical methodology
url http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/667
work_keys_str_mv AT lesliecgates puzzlingpoliticsamethodologyforturningworldsystemsanalysisinsideout
AT mehmetdeniz puzzlingpoliticsamethodologyforturningworldsystemsanalysisinsideout
_version_ 1724879060892385280