Retention of Implant Supported Metal Crowns Cemented with Different Luting Agents: A Comparative Invitro Study
Introduction: To overcome limitations of screw-retained prostheses, cement-retained prostheses have become the restoration of choice now a days. Selection of the cement hence becomes very critical to maintain retrievability of the prostheses. Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess and comp...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2016-04-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/7635/15912_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(EKAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdf |
id |
doaj-d5d76c9ab1d4411285eda587998611ac |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d5d76c9ab1d4411285eda587998611ac2020-11-25T03:26:35ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2016-04-01104ZC61ZC6410.7860/JCDR/2016/15912.7635Retention of Implant Supported Metal Crowns Cemented with Different Luting Agents: A Comparative Invitro StudyRoohi Kapoor0Kavipal Singh1Simrat Kaur2Aman Arora3Post Graduate Student, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Sri Amritsar, India.Professor and Head, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Sri Amritsar, India.Reader, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Sri Amritsar, India.Reader, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Sri Amritsar, India.Introduction: To overcome limitations of screw-retained prostheses, cement-retained prostheses have become the restoration of choice now a days. Selection of the cement hence becomes very critical to maintain retrievability of the prostheses. Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the retention of base metal crowns cemented to implant abutments with five different luting cements. Materials and Methods: Ten implant analogs were secured in five epoxy resin casts perpendicular to the plane of cast in right first molar and left first molar region and implant abutments were screwed. Total of 100 metal copings were fabricated and cemented. The cements used were zinc phosphate, resin modified glass ionomer cement, resin cement, non-eugenol acrylic based temporary implant cement & non-eugenol temporary resin cement implant cement. Samples were subjected to a pull-out test using an Instron universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min. The load required to de-cement each coping was recorded and mean values for each group calculated and put to statistical analysis. Results: The results showed that resin cement has the highest retention value 581.075N followed by zinc phosphate luting cement 529.48N, resin modified glass ionomer cement 338.095 N, non-eugenol acrylic based temporary implant cement 249.045 N and non-eugenol temporary resin implant cement 140.49N. Conclusion: Within the limitations of study, it was concluded that non-eugenol acrylic based temporary implant cement and non-eugenol temporary resin implant cement allow for easy retrievability of the prosthesis in case of any failure in future. These are suitable for cement retained implant restorations. The results provide a possible preliminary ranking of luting agents based on their ability to retain an implant-supported prosthesis and facilitate easy retrieval. https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/7635/15912_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(EKAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdfimplant restorationsluting cementretrievabilityretention test |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Roohi Kapoor Kavipal Singh Simrat Kaur Aman Arora |
spellingShingle |
Roohi Kapoor Kavipal Singh Simrat Kaur Aman Arora Retention of Implant Supported Metal Crowns Cemented with Different Luting Agents: A Comparative Invitro Study Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research implant restorations luting cement retrievability retention test |
author_facet |
Roohi Kapoor Kavipal Singh Simrat Kaur Aman Arora |
author_sort |
Roohi Kapoor |
title |
Retention of Implant Supported Metal Crowns Cemented with Different Luting Agents: A Comparative Invitro Study |
title_short |
Retention of Implant Supported Metal Crowns Cemented with Different Luting Agents: A Comparative Invitro Study |
title_full |
Retention of Implant Supported Metal Crowns Cemented with Different Luting Agents: A Comparative Invitro Study |
title_fullStr |
Retention of Implant Supported Metal Crowns Cemented with Different Luting Agents: A Comparative Invitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Retention of Implant Supported Metal Crowns Cemented with Different Luting Agents: A Comparative Invitro Study |
title_sort |
retention of implant supported metal crowns cemented with different luting agents: a comparative invitro study |
publisher |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited |
series |
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
issn |
2249-782X 0973-709X |
publishDate |
2016-04-01 |
description |
Introduction: To overcome limitations of screw-retained
prostheses, cement-retained prostheses have become the
restoration of choice now a days. Selection of the cement hence
becomes very critical to maintain retrievability of the prostheses.
Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the
retention of base metal crowns cemented to implant abutments
with five different luting cements.
Materials and Methods: Ten implant analogs were secured in
five epoxy resin casts perpendicular to the plane of cast in right
first molar and left first molar region and implant abutments
were screwed. Total of 100 metal copings were fabricated and
cemented. The cements used were zinc phosphate, resin modified
glass ionomer cement, resin cement, non-eugenol acrylic based
temporary implant cement & non-eugenol temporary resin cement
implant cement. Samples were subjected to a pull-out test using
an Instron universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of
0.5mm/min. The load required to de-cement each coping was
recorded and mean values for each group calculated and put to
statistical analysis.
Results: The results showed that resin cement has the highest
retention value 581.075N followed by zinc phosphate luting
cement 529.48N, resin modified glass ionomer cement 338.095
N, non-eugenol acrylic based temporary implant cement 249.045
N and non-eugenol temporary resin implant cement 140.49N.
Conclusion: Within the limitations of study, it was concluded
that non-eugenol acrylic based temporary implant cement and
non-eugenol temporary resin implant cement allow for easy
retrievability of the prosthesis in case of any failure in future. These
are suitable for cement retained implant restorations. The results
provide a possible preliminary ranking of luting agents based on
their ability to retain an implant-supported prosthesis and facilitate
easy retrieval. |
topic |
implant restorations luting cement retrievability retention test |
url |
https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/7635/15912_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(EKAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT roohikapoor retentionofimplantsupportedmetalcrownscementedwithdifferentlutingagentsacomparativeinvitrostudy AT kavipalsingh retentionofimplantsupportedmetalcrownscementedwithdifferentlutingagentsacomparativeinvitrostudy AT simratkaur retentionofimplantsupportedmetalcrownscementedwithdifferentlutingagentsacomparativeinvitrostudy AT amanarora retentionofimplantsupportedmetalcrownscementedwithdifferentlutingagentsacomparativeinvitrostudy |
_version_ |
1724591933807919104 |