L’hantologie cartésienne de la phénoménologie de la donation de Jean-Luc Marion

According to Jean-Luc Marion’s interpretation of Descartes, there is a strong ambivalence of Cartesian thought regarding metaphysics. On the one hand, Descartes has achieved metaphysics in the sense that he has completed it, by fixing all its major concepts and stakes for the modernity to come. As M...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stéphane Vinolo
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Université de Lille 2018-02-01
Series:Methodos
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/5005
id doaj-d5ec425b180d44a4bbfee00373d6f3bc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d5ec425b180d44a4bbfee00373d6f3bc2020-11-24T20:46:38ZfraUniversité de LilleMethodos1769-73792018-02-011810.4000/methodos.5005L’hantologie cartésienne de la phénoménologie de la donation de Jean-Luc MarionStéphane VinoloAccording to Jean-Luc Marion’s interpretation of Descartes, there is a strong ambivalence of Cartesian thought regarding metaphysics. On the one hand, Descartes has achieved metaphysics in the sense that he has completed it, by fixing all its major concepts and stakes for the modernity to come. As Marion shows, there is two onto-theo-logies in Descartes: one ruled by the concept of causa sui, and a second one built, from the subject, around the concept of cogitatio sui. We could then see Descartes as the most paradigmatic agent of classical metaphysics. But on the other hand, Marion states that Descartes has opened the possibility of the end of metaphysics by showing its limits through the non-metaphysical use of the infinite and the flesh, as well as the secondarity of the subject. Each onto-theo-logy is then always already broken and opened, pointing at an outside of metaphysics. Thus, Descartes is used, by Marion, as the philosopher who draws the borders and the limits, not only between philosophy and metaphysics, but also those that pass at the very heart of phenomenology, between constituted phenomena and given phenomena. Yet, on many occasions, Marion shows that those borders are not as clear as they seem, given that there is an original blurring of the inside and the outside of metaphysics, blurring on which Marion built his entire phenomenology of givenness. Then, for Marion and his phenomenology of givenness, Descartes is a kind of ghost, that should have been eliminated by the phenomenological overcome of metaphysics, but that lingers in all the major concepts of Marion’s phenomenology.http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/5005DescartesgiftedgivennessMarion Jean-Lucsaturated phenomenaCogito
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stéphane Vinolo
spellingShingle Stéphane Vinolo
L’hantologie cartésienne de la phénoménologie de la donation de Jean-Luc Marion
Methodos
Descartes
gifted
givenness
Marion Jean-Luc
saturated phenomena
Cogito
author_facet Stéphane Vinolo
author_sort Stéphane Vinolo
title L’hantologie cartésienne de la phénoménologie de la donation de Jean-Luc Marion
title_short L’hantologie cartésienne de la phénoménologie de la donation de Jean-Luc Marion
title_full L’hantologie cartésienne de la phénoménologie de la donation de Jean-Luc Marion
title_fullStr L’hantologie cartésienne de la phénoménologie de la donation de Jean-Luc Marion
title_full_unstemmed L’hantologie cartésienne de la phénoménologie de la donation de Jean-Luc Marion
title_sort l’hantologie cartésienne de la phénoménologie de la donation de jean-luc marion
publisher Université de Lille
series Methodos
issn 1769-7379
publishDate 2018-02-01
description According to Jean-Luc Marion’s interpretation of Descartes, there is a strong ambivalence of Cartesian thought regarding metaphysics. On the one hand, Descartes has achieved metaphysics in the sense that he has completed it, by fixing all its major concepts and stakes for the modernity to come. As Marion shows, there is two onto-theo-logies in Descartes: one ruled by the concept of causa sui, and a second one built, from the subject, around the concept of cogitatio sui. We could then see Descartes as the most paradigmatic agent of classical metaphysics. But on the other hand, Marion states that Descartes has opened the possibility of the end of metaphysics by showing its limits through the non-metaphysical use of the infinite and the flesh, as well as the secondarity of the subject. Each onto-theo-logy is then always already broken and opened, pointing at an outside of metaphysics. Thus, Descartes is used, by Marion, as the philosopher who draws the borders and the limits, not only between philosophy and metaphysics, but also those that pass at the very heart of phenomenology, between constituted phenomena and given phenomena. Yet, on many occasions, Marion shows that those borders are not as clear as they seem, given that there is an original blurring of the inside and the outside of metaphysics, blurring on which Marion built his entire phenomenology of givenness. Then, for Marion and his phenomenology of givenness, Descartes is a kind of ghost, that should have been eliminated by the phenomenological overcome of metaphysics, but that lingers in all the major concepts of Marion’s phenomenology.
topic Descartes
gifted
givenness
Marion Jean-Luc
saturated phenomena
Cogito
url http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/5005
work_keys_str_mv AT stephanevinolo lhantologiecartesiennedelaphenomenologiedeladonationdejeanlucmarion
_version_ 1716812070568067072