The hybrid intellectual capital valuation method
This study aims to improve the existing problems of intellectual capital (IC) measurement methods including those with unclear and unspecific calculation details and the inability to valuate the influences between IC measures and between IC components, which is a fundamental characteristic of IC. To...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Ekonomska Istraživanja |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1860798 |
id |
doaj-d60165839c4944c3baef90fae1aaa2f7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d60165839c4944c3baef90fae1aaa2f72021-08-09T15:50:05ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEkonomska Istraživanja1331-677X1848-96642021-01-013412115213410.1080/1331677X.2020.18607981860798The hybrid intellectual capital valuation methodRatapol Wudhikarn0Knowledge and Innovation Management, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai UniversityThis study aims to improve the existing problems of intellectual capital (IC) measurement methods including those with unclear and unspecific calculation details and the inability to valuate the influences between IC measures and between IC components, which is a fundamental characteristic of IC. To address the fundamental issues of past methods, this study integrates two multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods: the analytic network process (ANP) and the simple additive weighting (SAW) method, both of which provide specific and clear calculation procedures. ANP is adopted to manage the valuation of influences between IC elements, while SAW is used to solve incommensurable units of IC performance indicators and different concentrations on IC measures and components. Implementation of the method revealed a clear and systematic measurement procedure. The proposed method could consider the relationships among IC measures as well as among IC components and presented calculated results in the form of the weights of IC measurement compositions. Furthermore, the method maintained the crucial characteristics of IC measurement: the ability to standardise units of measure and the capability to valuate the performance of IC for the appropriate measure, component, and holism level.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1860798intellectual capital (ic)performance measurementmulti-criteria decision making (mcdmanalytic network process (anp)simple additive weighting (saw) |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ratapol Wudhikarn |
spellingShingle |
Ratapol Wudhikarn The hybrid intellectual capital valuation method Ekonomska Istraživanja intellectual capital (ic) performance measurement multi-criteria decision making (mcdm analytic network process (anp) simple additive weighting (saw) |
author_facet |
Ratapol Wudhikarn |
author_sort |
Ratapol Wudhikarn |
title |
The hybrid intellectual capital valuation method |
title_short |
The hybrid intellectual capital valuation method |
title_full |
The hybrid intellectual capital valuation method |
title_fullStr |
The hybrid intellectual capital valuation method |
title_full_unstemmed |
The hybrid intellectual capital valuation method |
title_sort |
hybrid intellectual capital valuation method |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Ekonomska Istraživanja |
issn |
1331-677X 1848-9664 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
This study aims to improve the existing problems of intellectual capital (IC) measurement methods including those with unclear and unspecific calculation details and the inability to valuate the influences between IC measures and between IC components, which is a fundamental characteristic of IC. To address the fundamental issues of past methods, this study integrates two multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods: the analytic network process (ANP) and the simple additive weighting (SAW) method, both of which provide specific and clear calculation procedures. ANP is adopted to manage the valuation of influences between IC elements, while SAW is used to solve incommensurable units of IC performance indicators and different concentrations on IC measures and components. Implementation of the method revealed a clear and systematic measurement procedure. The proposed method could consider the relationships among IC measures as well as among IC components and presented calculated results in the form of the weights of IC measurement compositions. Furthermore, the method maintained the crucial characteristics of IC measurement: the ability to standardise units of measure and the capability to valuate the performance of IC for the appropriate measure, component, and holism level. |
topic |
intellectual capital (ic) performance measurement multi-criteria decision making (mcdm analytic network process (anp) simple additive weighting (saw) |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1860798 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ratapolwudhikarn thehybridintellectualcapitalvaluationmethod AT ratapolwudhikarn hybridintellectualcapitalvaluationmethod |
_version_ |
1721213822490902528 |