The hybrid intellectual capital valuation method

This study aims to improve the existing problems of intellectual capital (IC) measurement methods including those with unclear and unspecific calculation details and the inability to valuate the influences between IC measures and between IC components, which is a fundamental characteristic of IC. To...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ratapol Wudhikarn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-01-01
Series:Ekonomska Istraživanja
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1860798
id doaj-d60165839c4944c3baef90fae1aaa2f7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d60165839c4944c3baef90fae1aaa2f72021-08-09T15:50:05ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEkonomska Istraživanja1331-677X1848-96642021-01-013412115213410.1080/1331677X.2020.18607981860798The hybrid intellectual capital valuation methodRatapol Wudhikarn0Knowledge and Innovation Management, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai UniversityThis study aims to improve the existing problems of intellectual capital (IC) measurement methods including those with unclear and unspecific calculation details and the inability to valuate the influences between IC measures and between IC components, which is a fundamental characteristic of IC. To address the fundamental issues of past methods, this study integrates two multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods: the analytic network process (ANP) and the simple additive weighting (SAW) method, both of which provide specific and clear calculation procedures. ANP is adopted to manage the valuation of influences between IC elements, while SAW is used to solve incommensurable units of IC performance indicators and different concentrations on IC measures and components. Implementation of the method revealed a clear and systematic measurement procedure. The proposed method could consider the relationships among IC measures as well as among IC components and presented calculated results in the form of the weights of IC measurement compositions. Furthermore, the method maintained the crucial characteristics of IC measurement: the ability to standardise units of measure and the capability to valuate the performance of IC for the appropriate measure, component, and holism level.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1860798intellectual capital (ic)performance measurementmulti-criteria decision making (mcdmanalytic network process (anp)simple additive weighting (saw)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ratapol Wudhikarn
spellingShingle Ratapol Wudhikarn
The hybrid intellectual capital valuation method
Ekonomska Istraživanja
intellectual capital (ic)
performance measurement
multi-criteria decision making (mcdm
analytic network process (anp)
simple additive weighting (saw)
author_facet Ratapol Wudhikarn
author_sort Ratapol Wudhikarn
title The hybrid intellectual capital valuation method
title_short The hybrid intellectual capital valuation method
title_full The hybrid intellectual capital valuation method
title_fullStr The hybrid intellectual capital valuation method
title_full_unstemmed The hybrid intellectual capital valuation method
title_sort hybrid intellectual capital valuation method
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Ekonomska Istraživanja
issn 1331-677X
1848-9664
publishDate 2021-01-01
description This study aims to improve the existing problems of intellectual capital (IC) measurement methods including those with unclear and unspecific calculation details and the inability to valuate the influences between IC measures and between IC components, which is a fundamental characteristic of IC. To address the fundamental issues of past methods, this study integrates two multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods: the analytic network process (ANP) and the simple additive weighting (SAW) method, both of which provide specific and clear calculation procedures. ANP is adopted to manage the valuation of influences between IC elements, while SAW is used to solve incommensurable units of IC performance indicators and different concentrations on IC measures and components. Implementation of the method revealed a clear and systematic measurement procedure. The proposed method could consider the relationships among IC measures as well as among IC components and presented calculated results in the form of the weights of IC measurement compositions. Furthermore, the method maintained the crucial characteristics of IC measurement: the ability to standardise units of measure and the capability to valuate the performance of IC for the appropriate measure, component, and holism level.
topic intellectual capital (ic)
performance measurement
multi-criteria decision making (mcdm
analytic network process (anp)
simple additive weighting (saw)
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1860798
work_keys_str_mv AT ratapolwudhikarn thehybridintellectualcapitalvaluationmethod
AT ratapolwudhikarn hybridintellectualcapitalvaluationmethod
_version_ 1721213822490902528