Why did bluetongue spread the way it did? Environmental factors influencing the velocity of bluetongue virus serotype 8 epizootic wave in France.

Understanding where and how fast an infectious disease will spread during an epidemic is critical for its control. However, the task is a challenging one as numerous factors may interact and drive the spread of a disease, specifically when vector-borne diseases are involved. We advocate the use of s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maryline Pioz, Hélène Guis, Laurent Crespin, Emilie Gay, Didier Calavas, Benoît Durand, David Abrial, Christian Ducrot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3419712?pdf=render
id doaj-d619ce7af63c4ef086b48b5b3315b4d9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d619ce7af63c4ef086b48b5b3315b4d92020-11-25T01:47:12ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0178e4336010.1371/journal.pone.0043360Why did bluetongue spread the way it did? Environmental factors influencing the velocity of bluetongue virus serotype 8 epizootic wave in France.Maryline PiozHélène GuisLaurent CrespinEmilie GayDidier CalavasBenoît DurandDavid AbrialChristian DucrotUnderstanding where and how fast an infectious disease will spread during an epidemic is critical for its control. However, the task is a challenging one as numerous factors may interact and drive the spread of a disease, specifically when vector-borne diseases are involved. We advocate the use of simultaneous autoregressive models to identify environmental features that significantly impact the velocity of disease spread. We illustrate this approach by exploring several environmental factors influencing the velocity of bluetongue (BT) spread in France during the 2007-2008 epizootic wave to determine which ones were the most important drivers. We used velocities of BT spread estimated in 4,495 municipalities and tested sixteen covariates defining five thematic groups of related variables: elevation, meteorological-related variables, landscape-related variables, host availability, and vaccination. We found that ecological factors associated with vector abundance and activity (elevation and meteorological-related variables), as well as with host availability, were important drivers of the spread of the disease. Specifically, the disease spread more slowly in areas with high elevation and when heavy rainfall associated with extreme temperature events occurred one or two months prior to the first clinical case. Moreover, the density of dairy cattle was correlated negatively with the velocity of BT spread. These findings add substantially to our understanding of BT spread in a temperate climate. Finally, the approach presented in this paper can be used with other infectious diseases, and provides a powerful tool to identify environmental features driving the velocity of disease spread.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3419712?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maryline Pioz
Hélène Guis
Laurent Crespin
Emilie Gay
Didier Calavas
Benoît Durand
David Abrial
Christian Ducrot
spellingShingle Maryline Pioz
Hélène Guis
Laurent Crespin
Emilie Gay
Didier Calavas
Benoît Durand
David Abrial
Christian Ducrot
Why did bluetongue spread the way it did? Environmental factors influencing the velocity of bluetongue virus serotype 8 epizootic wave in France.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Maryline Pioz
Hélène Guis
Laurent Crespin
Emilie Gay
Didier Calavas
Benoît Durand
David Abrial
Christian Ducrot
author_sort Maryline Pioz
title Why did bluetongue spread the way it did? Environmental factors influencing the velocity of bluetongue virus serotype 8 epizootic wave in France.
title_short Why did bluetongue spread the way it did? Environmental factors influencing the velocity of bluetongue virus serotype 8 epizootic wave in France.
title_full Why did bluetongue spread the way it did? Environmental factors influencing the velocity of bluetongue virus serotype 8 epizootic wave in France.
title_fullStr Why did bluetongue spread the way it did? Environmental factors influencing the velocity of bluetongue virus serotype 8 epizootic wave in France.
title_full_unstemmed Why did bluetongue spread the way it did? Environmental factors influencing the velocity of bluetongue virus serotype 8 epizootic wave in France.
title_sort why did bluetongue spread the way it did? environmental factors influencing the velocity of bluetongue virus serotype 8 epizootic wave in france.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Understanding where and how fast an infectious disease will spread during an epidemic is critical for its control. However, the task is a challenging one as numerous factors may interact and drive the spread of a disease, specifically when vector-borne diseases are involved. We advocate the use of simultaneous autoregressive models to identify environmental features that significantly impact the velocity of disease spread. We illustrate this approach by exploring several environmental factors influencing the velocity of bluetongue (BT) spread in France during the 2007-2008 epizootic wave to determine which ones were the most important drivers. We used velocities of BT spread estimated in 4,495 municipalities and tested sixteen covariates defining five thematic groups of related variables: elevation, meteorological-related variables, landscape-related variables, host availability, and vaccination. We found that ecological factors associated with vector abundance and activity (elevation and meteorological-related variables), as well as with host availability, were important drivers of the spread of the disease. Specifically, the disease spread more slowly in areas with high elevation and when heavy rainfall associated with extreme temperature events occurred one or two months prior to the first clinical case. Moreover, the density of dairy cattle was correlated negatively with the velocity of BT spread. These findings add substantially to our understanding of BT spread in a temperate climate. Finally, the approach presented in this paper can be used with other infectious diseases, and provides a powerful tool to identify environmental features driving the velocity of disease spread.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3419712?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT marylinepioz whydidbluetonguespreadthewayitdidenvironmentalfactorsinfluencingthevelocityofbluetonguevirusserotype8epizooticwaveinfrance
AT heleneguis whydidbluetonguespreadthewayitdidenvironmentalfactorsinfluencingthevelocityofbluetonguevirusserotype8epizooticwaveinfrance
AT laurentcrespin whydidbluetonguespreadthewayitdidenvironmentalfactorsinfluencingthevelocityofbluetonguevirusserotype8epizooticwaveinfrance
AT emiliegay whydidbluetonguespreadthewayitdidenvironmentalfactorsinfluencingthevelocityofbluetonguevirusserotype8epizooticwaveinfrance
AT didiercalavas whydidbluetonguespreadthewayitdidenvironmentalfactorsinfluencingthevelocityofbluetonguevirusserotype8epizooticwaveinfrance
AT benoitdurand whydidbluetonguespreadthewayitdidenvironmentalfactorsinfluencingthevelocityofbluetonguevirusserotype8epizooticwaveinfrance
AT davidabrial whydidbluetonguespreadthewayitdidenvironmentalfactorsinfluencingthevelocityofbluetonguevirusserotype8epizooticwaveinfrance
AT christianducrot whydidbluetonguespreadthewayitdidenvironmentalfactorsinfluencingthevelocityofbluetonguevirusserotype8epizooticwaveinfrance
_version_ 1725015567004336128