Constructing the context through goals and schemata: top-down processes in comprehension and beyond

My main purpose here is to provide an account of context selection in utterance understanding in terms of the role played by schemata and goals in top-down processing. The general idea is that information is organized hierarchically, with items iteratively organized in chunks – here called schemata...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marco eMazzone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00651/full
id doaj-d631033a7a9a4b5cae5b787e547315ed
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d631033a7a9a4b5cae5b787e547315ed2020-11-24T21:25:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782015-05-01610.3389/fpsyg.2015.00651132181Constructing the context through goals and schemata: top-down processes in comprehension and beyondMarco eMazzone0University of CataniaMy main purpose here is to provide an account of context selection in utterance understanding in terms of the role played by schemata and goals in top-down processing. The general idea is that information is organized hierarchically, with items iteratively organized in chunks – here called schemata – at multiple levels, so that the activation of any items spreads to schemata that are the most accessible due to previous experience. The activation of a schema, in turn, activates its other components, so as to predict a likely context for the original item. Since each input activates its own schemata, conflicting schemata compete with (and inhibit) each other, while multiple activations of a schema raise its likelihood to win the competition. There is therefore a double movement – with bottom-up activation of schemata enabling top-down prediction of other contextual components – triggered by multiple sources. Another claim of the paper is that goals are represented by schemata placed at the highest-levels of the executive hierarchy, in accordance with Fuster’s model of the brain as a hierarchically organized perception-action cycle. This account can be considered, in part at least, a development of ideas contained in Relevance Theory, though it may imply that some other claims of the theory are in need of revision. Therefore, a secondary purpose of the paper is a contribution to the analysis of that theory.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00651/fullMindreadingcontextpragmaticsSchemasHierarchical representation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marco eMazzone
spellingShingle Marco eMazzone
Constructing the context through goals and schemata: top-down processes in comprehension and beyond
Frontiers in Psychology
Mindreading
context
pragmatics
Schemas
Hierarchical representation
author_facet Marco eMazzone
author_sort Marco eMazzone
title Constructing the context through goals and schemata: top-down processes in comprehension and beyond
title_short Constructing the context through goals and schemata: top-down processes in comprehension and beyond
title_full Constructing the context through goals and schemata: top-down processes in comprehension and beyond
title_fullStr Constructing the context through goals and schemata: top-down processes in comprehension and beyond
title_full_unstemmed Constructing the context through goals and schemata: top-down processes in comprehension and beyond
title_sort constructing the context through goals and schemata: top-down processes in comprehension and beyond
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2015-05-01
description My main purpose here is to provide an account of context selection in utterance understanding in terms of the role played by schemata and goals in top-down processing. The general idea is that information is organized hierarchically, with items iteratively organized in chunks – here called schemata – at multiple levels, so that the activation of any items spreads to schemata that are the most accessible due to previous experience. The activation of a schema, in turn, activates its other components, so as to predict a likely context for the original item. Since each input activates its own schemata, conflicting schemata compete with (and inhibit) each other, while multiple activations of a schema raise its likelihood to win the competition. There is therefore a double movement – with bottom-up activation of schemata enabling top-down prediction of other contextual components – triggered by multiple sources. Another claim of the paper is that goals are represented by schemata placed at the highest-levels of the executive hierarchy, in accordance with Fuster’s model of the brain as a hierarchically organized perception-action cycle. This account can be considered, in part at least, a development of ideas contained in Relevance Theory, though it may imply that some other claims of the theory are in need of revision. Therefore, a secondary purpose of the paper is a contribution to the analysis of that theory.
topic Mindreading
context
pragmatics
Schemas
Hierarchical representation
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00651/full
work_keys_str_mv AT marcoemazzone constructingthecontextthroughgoalsandschematatopdownprocessesincomprehensionandbeyond
_version_ 1725985008110272512