Children Crossing Streets: The Cognitive Task of Pedestrians Across Nations

Background: About 100,000 children die worldwide in pedestrian crashes, more than 90% of whom live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, most existing research on children's ability to cross the street is conducted in high-income countries (HICs). Objective: The present study di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David C. Schwebel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Levy Library Press 2017-05-01
Series:Annals of Global Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/200
id doaj-d6576d40e9f94c4b977b74cdd294d0fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d6576d40e9f94c4b977b74cdd294d0fc2020-11-24T23:54:03ZengLevy Library PressAnnals of Global Health2214-99962017-05-0183232833210.1016/j.aogh.2017.04.004132Children Crossing Streets: The Cognitive Task of Pedestrians Across NationsDavid C. Schwebel0Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AlabamaBackground: About 100,000 children die worldwide in pedestrian crashes, more than 90% of whom live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, most existing research on children's ability to cross the street is conducted in high-income countries (HICs). Objective: The present study discusses 4 ways pedestrian behavior in LMICs differs from that in HICs, influencing both children's ability to cross streets safely and adult efforts to train children in pedestrian safety. Findings: First, in many LMICs one cannot simply wait for a traffic gap that is large enough to permit crossing at a typical walking pace. Instead, pedestrians must enter traffic gaps they deem large enough to permit the oncoming driver to stop, slow, or swerve around them. Second, decisions in LMICs must be made very quickly to maximize safety. In many cases, pedestrians must anticipate how oncoming drivers will behave as a crossing is initiated. Third, multilane LMIC crossings sometimes involve separated decisions to cross each lane and then evaluate safety in the middle of the roadway rather than making a single decision to cross the entire span within a safe traffic gap. Last, children's short stature may substantially influence behavior in LMIC settings. When gaps are small and open spaces limited, the ability to see over oncoming vehicles and perceive them approaching, including how spread they are and at what speeds they are traveling, offers a distinct advantage to the taller pedestria. Conclusions: Taken together, it is concluded that safe child pedestrian engagement in LMICs is more complex, and may require more developed cognitive skill, than safe child pedestrian engagement in HICs.https://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/200pedestriansafetyinjurycognitionchild development
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David C. Schwebel
spellingShingle David C. Schwebel
Children Crossing Streets: The Cognitive Task of Pedestrians Across Nations
Annals of Global Health
pedestrian
safety
injury
cognition
child development
author_facet David C. Schwebel
author_sort David C. Schwebel
title Children Crossing Streets: The Cognitive Task of Pedestrians Across Nations
title_short Children Crossing Streets: The Cognitive Task of Pedestrians Across Nations
title_full Children Crossing Streets: The Cognitive Task of Pedestrians Across Nations
title_fullStr Children Crossing Streets: The Cognitive Task of Pedestrians Across Nations
title_full_unstemmed Children Crossing Streets: The Cognitive Task of Pedestrians Across Nations
title_sort children crossing streets: the cognitive task of pedestrians across nations
publisher Levy Library Press
series Annals of Global Health
issn 2214-9996
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Background: About 100,000 children die worldwide in pedestrian crashes, more than 90% of whom live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, most existing research on children's ability to cross the street is conducted in high-income countries (HICs). Objective: The present study discusses 4 ways pedestrian behavior in LMICs differs from that in HICs, influencing both children's ability to cross streets safely and adult efforts to train children in pedestrian safety. Findings: First, in many LMICs one cannot simply wait for a traffic gap that is large enough to permit crossing at a typical walking pace. Instead, pedestrians must enter traffic gaps they deem large enough to permit the oncoming driver to stop, slow, or swerve around them. Second, decisions in LMICs must be made very quickly to maximize safety. In many cases, pedestrians must anticipate how oncoming drivers will behave as a crossing is initiated. Third, multilane LMIC crossings sometimes involve separated decisions to cross each lane and then evaluate safety in the middle of the roadway rather than making a single decision to cross the entire span within a safe traffic gap. Last, children's short stature may substantially influence behavior in LMIC settings. When gaps are small and open spaces limited, the ability to see over oncoming vehicles and perceive them approaching, including how spread they are and at what speeds they are traveling, offers a distinct advantage to the taller pedestria. Conclusions: Taken together, it is concluded that safe child pedestrian engagement in LMICs is more complex, and may require more developed cognitive skill, than safe child pedestrian engagement in HICs.
topic pedestrian
safety
injury
cognition
child development
url https://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/200
work_keys_str_mv AT davidcschwebel childrencrossingstreetsthecognitivetaskofpedestriansacrossnations
_version_ 1725467650703753216