Comparison of two methods of protein quality evaluation in rice, rye and barley as food protein sources in human nutrition

Different foods differ in their protein quality, which is characterized by the content and digestibility of individual amino acids. The Food and Agriculture Organisation has recommended replacing the method for protein quality evaluation of foods called protein digestibility corrected amino acid sco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soňa Nitrayová, Matej Brestenský, Peter Patráš
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: HACCP Consulting 2018-12-01
Series:Potravinarstvo
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.potravinarstvo.com/journal1/index.php/potravinarstvo/article/view/991
id doaj-d6fb71940cf6414f849fdd3d76acf848
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d6fb71940cf6414f849fdd3d76acf8482020-11-24T22:19:01ZengHACCP ConsultingPotravinarstvo 1337-09602018-12-0112176276610.5219/991723Comparison of two methods of protein quality evaluation in rice, rye and barley as food protein sources in human nutritionSoňa Nitrayová0Matej Brestenský1Peter Patráš2TEKMAR SLOVENSKO, s.r.o., Vinárska 26, 951 41 LužiankyTEKMAR SLOVENSKO, s.r.o., Vinárska 26, 951 41 LužiankyNational Agricultural and Food Center, Research Institute of Animal Production Nitra, Department of Nutrition, Hlohovecká 2, 951 41 LužiankyDifferent foods differ in their protein quality, which is characterized by the content and digestibility of individual amino acids. The Food and Agriculture Organisation has recommended replacing the method for protein quality evaluation of foods called protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) with the new method - digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS), in which the values of ileal amino acid digestibility obtained in pigs are used. However, the information about DIAAS values of foods are limited. Therefore, the study on growing pigs was conducted to determine true fecal protein digestibility and standardized ileal amino acid digestibility of rice, rye and barley. Using these values, the PDCAAS and DIAAS were calculated and compared. A total of 18 gilts with a T-cannula inserted in the terminal ileum were allotted to 3 diets with six replicate pigs per diet. Three semi-purified diets were formulated to contain the tested cereal grains (rice, rye, barley) as the sole nitrogen source. Chromic oxide was used as indigestible marker. Each experimental period comprised of a 7-d adaptation period followed by 24 h collection of feces and ileal digesta. The content of nitrogen, dry matter and chromic oxide was analyzed in samples of diets, feces and ileal digesta. Moreover, in the samples of diets and ileal digesta the content of amino acids was determined. Calculated ratio of crude protein to lysine was greatest in rice (4.50) followed by rye (3.65) and the lowest one in barley (3.35). True fecal protein digestibility was greater when compared with ileal amino acid digestibility for all tested samples, thus suggesting an overestimation of protein quality determined by PDCAAS. Calculated PDCAAS values for rice, rye and barley (81, 65 and 61%) were generally greater than the DIAAS values (79, 56 and 55%), especially for the poorer quality protein sources such as rye and barley in comparison with rice. The lysine was the first limiting amino acid in all tested cereal grains. Based on the DIAAS evaluation, rice is better protein source in human nutrition in comparison with rye or barley.http://www.potravinarstvo.com/journal1/index.php/potravinarstvo/article/view/991PDCAASDIAASprotein qualityamino acidileal
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Soňa Nitrayová
Matej Brestenský
Peter Patráš
spellingShingle Soňa Nitrayová
Matej Brestenský
Peter Patráš
Comparison of two methods of protein quality evaluation in rice, rye and barley as food protein sources in human nutrition
Potravinarstvo
PDCAAS
DIAAS
protein quality
amino acid
ileal
author_facet Soňa Nitrayová
Matej Brestenský
Peter Patráš
author_sort Soňa Nitrayová
title Comparison of two methods of protein quality evaluation in rice, rye and barley as food protein sources in human nutrition
title_short Comparison of two methods of protein quality evaluation in rice, rye and barley as food protein sources in human nutrition
title_full Comparison of two methods of protein quality evaluation in rice, rye and barley as food protein sources in human nutrition
title_fullStr Comparison of two methods of protein quality evaluation in rice, rye and barley as food protein sources in human nutrition
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two methods of protein quality evaluation in rice, rye and barley as food protein sources in human nutrition
title_sort comparison of two methods of protein quality evaluation in rice, rye and barley as food protein sources in human nutrition
publisher HACCP Consulting
series Potravinarstvo
issn 1337-0960
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Different foods differ in their protein quality, which is characterized by the content and digestibility of individual amino acids. The Food and Agriculture Organisation has recommended replacing the method for protein quality evaluation of foods called protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) with the new method - digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS), in which the values of ileal amino acid digestibility obtained in pigs are used. However, the information about DIAAS values of foods are limited. Therefore, the study on growing pigs was conducted to determine true fecal protein digestibility and standardized ileal amino acid digestibility of rice, rye and barley. Using these values, the PDCAAS and DIAAS were calculated and compared. A total of 18 gilts with a T-cannula inserted in the terminal ileum were allotted to 3 diets with six replicate pigs per diet. Three semi-purified diets were formulated to contain the tested cereal grains (rice, rye, barley) as the sole nitrogen source. Chromic oxide was used as indigestible marker. Each experimental period comprised of a 7-d adaptation period followed by 24 h collection of feces and ileal digesta. The content of nitrogen, dry matter and chromic oxide was analyzed in samples of diets, feces and ileal digesta. Moreover, in the samples of diets and ileal digesta the content of amino acids was determined. Calculated ratio of crude protein to lysine was greatest in rice (4.50) followed by rye (3.65) and the lowest one in barley (3.35). True fecal protein digestibility was greater when compared with ileal amino acid digestibility for all tested samples, thus suggesting an overestimation of protein quality determined by PDCAAS. Calculated PDCAAS values for rice, rye and barley (81, 65 and 61%) were generally greater than the DIAAS values (79, 56 and 55%), especially for the poorer quality protein sources such as rye and barley in comparison with rice. The lysine was the first limiting amino acid in all tested cereal grains. Based on the DIAAS evaluation, rice is better protein source in human nutrition in comparison with rye or barley.
topic PDCAAS
DIAAS
protein quality
amino acid
ileal
url http://www.potravinarstvo.com/journal1/index.php/potravinarstvo/article/view/991
work_keys_str_mv AT sonanitrayova comparisonoftwomethodsofproteinqualityevaluationinriceryeandbarleyasfoodproteinsourcesinhumannutrition
AT matejbrestensky comparisonoftwomethodsofproteinqualityevaluationinriceryeandbarleyasfoodproteinsourcesinhumannutrition
AT peterpatras comparisonoftwomethodsofproteinqualityevaluationinriceryeandbarleyasfoodproteinsourcesinhumannutrition
_version_ 1725780584003796992