Out-of-pocket payments in the context of a free maternal health care policy in Burkina Faso: a national cross-sectional survey

Abstract Background In April 2016, Burkina Faso introduced a free health care policy for women. Instead of reimbursing health facilities, as many sub-Saharan countries do, the government paid them prospectively for covered services to avoid reimbursement delays, which are cited as a reason for the p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ivlabèhiré Bertrand Meda, Adama Baguiya, Valéry Ridde, Henri Gautier Ouédraogo, Alexandre Dumont, Seni Kouanda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-03-01
Series:Health Economics Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13561-019-0228-8
id doaj-d70150d813784d089b6fe3f852c533d1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d70150d813784d089b6fe3f852c533d12020-11-25T02:20:19ZengBMCHealth Economics Review2191-19912019-03-019111410.1186/s13561-019-0228-8Out-of-pocket payments in the context of a free maternal health care policy in Burkina Faso: a national cross-sectional surveyIvlabèhiré Bertrand Meda0Adama Baguiya1Valéry Ridde2Henri Gautier Ouédraogo3Alexandre Dumont4Seni Kouanda5Département Biomédical et Santé Publique, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS/CNRST)Département Biomédical et Santé Publique, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS/CNRST)Institut de recherche en Santé Publique de l’Université de Montréal (IRSPUM)Département Biomédical et Santé Publique, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS/CNRST)IRD (French Institute for Research on Sustainable Development), CEPED (IRD-Université Paris Descartes), Universités Paris Sorbonne Cités, ERL INSERM SAGESUDDépartement Biomédical et Santé Publique, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS/CNRST)Abstract Background In April 2016, Burkina Faso introduced a free health care policy for women. Instead of reimbursing health facilities, as many sub-Saharan countries do, the government paid them prospectively for covered services to avoid reimbursement delays, which are cited as a reason for the persistence of out-of-pocket (OOP) payments. This study aimed to (i) estimate the direct expenditures of deliveries and covered obstetric care, (ii) determine the OOP payments, and (iii) identify the patient and health facility characteristics associated with OOP payments. Methods A national cross-sectional study was conducted in September and October 2016 in 395 randomly selected health facilities. A structured questionnaire was administered to women (n = 593) who had delivered or received obstetric care on the day of the survey. The direct health expenditures included fees for consultations, prescriptions, paraclinical examinations, hospitalization and ambulance transport. A two-part model with robust variances was performed to identify the factors associated with OOP payments. Results A total of 587 women were included in the analysis. The median direct health expenses were US$5.38 [interquartile range (IQR):4.35–6.65], US$24.72 [IQR:16.57–46.09] and US$136.39 [IQR: 108.36–161.42] for normal delivery, dystocia and cesarean section, respectively. Nearly one-third (29.6%, n = 174) of the women reported having paid for their care. OOP payments ranged from US$0.08 to US$98.67, with a median of US$1.77 [IQR:0.83–7.08]). Overall, 17.5% (n = 103) of the women had purchased drugs at private pharmacies, and 11.4% (n = 67) had purchased cleaning products for a room or equipment. OOP payments were more frequent with age, for emergency obstetric care and among women who work. The women’s health region of origin was also significantly associated with OOP payments. For those who made OOP payments, the amounts paid decreased with age but were higher in urban areas, in hospitals, and among the most educated women. The amounts paid were lower among students and were associated with health region. Conclusion The policy is effective for financial protection. However, improvements in the management and supply system of health facilities’ pharmacies could further reduce OOP payments in the context of the free health care policy in Burkina Faso.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13561-019-0228-8Free care policyMaternal careDirect expensesOut-of-pocket paymentSub-Saharan
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ivlabèhiré Bertrand Meda
Adama Baguiya
Valéry Ridde
Henri Gautier Ouédraogo
Alexandre Dumont
Seni Kouanda
spellingShingle Ivlabèhiré Bertrand Meda
Adama Baguiya
Valéry Ridde
Henri Gautier Ouédraogo
Alexandre Dumont
Seni Kouanda
Out-of-pocket payments in the context of a free maternal health care policy in Burkina Faso: a national cross-sectional survey
Health Economics Review
Free care policy
Maternal care
Direct expenses
Out-of-pocket payment
Sub-Saharan
author_facet Ivlabèhiré Bertrand Meda
Adama Baguiya
Valéry Ridde
Henri Gautier Ouédraogo
Alexandre Dumont
Seni Kouanda
author_sort Ivlabèhiré Bertrand Meda
title Out-of-pocket payments in the context of a free maternal health care policy in Burkina Faso: a national cross-sectional survey
title_short Out-of-pocket payments in the context of a free maternal health care policy in Burkina Faso: a national cross-sectional survey
title_full Out-of-pocket payments in the context of a free maternal health care policy in Burkina Faso: a national cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Out-of-pocket payments in the context of a free maternal health care policy in Burkina Faso: a national cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Out-of-pocket payments in the context of a free maternal health care policy in Burkina Faso: a national cross-sectional survey
title_sort out-of-pocket payments in the context of a free maternal health care policy in burkina faso: a national cross-sectional survey
publisher BMC
series Health Economics Review
issn 2191-1991
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Abstract Background In April 2016, Burkina Faso introduced a free health care policy for women. Instead of reimbursing health facilities, as many sub-Saharan countries do, the government paid them prospectively for covered services to avoid reimbursement delays, which are cited as a reason for the persistence of out-of-pocket (OOP) payments. This study aimed to (i) estimate the direct expenditures of deliveries and covered obstetric care, (ii) determine the OOP payments, and (iii) identify the patient and health facility characteristics associated with OOP payments. Methods A national cross-sectional study was conducted in September and October 2016 in 395 randomly selected health facilities. A structured questionnaire was administered to women (n = 593) who had delivered or received obstetric care on the day of the survey. The direct health expenditures included fees for consultations, prescriptions, paraclinical examinations, hospitalization and ambulance transport. A two-part model with robust variances was performed to identify the factors associated with OOP payments. Results A total of 587 women were included in the analysis. The median direct health expenses were US$5.38 [interquartile range (IQR):4.35–6.65], US$24.72 [IQR:16.57–46.09] and US$136.39 [IQR: 108.36–161.42] for normal delivery, dystocia and cesarean section, respectively. Nearly one-third (29.6%, n = 174) of the women reported having paid for their care. OOP payments ranged from US$0.08 to US$98.67, with a median of US$1.77 [IQR:0.83–7.08]). Overall, 17.5% (n = 103) of the women had purchased drugs at private pharmacies, and 11.4% (n = 67) had purchased cleaning products for a room or equipment. OOP payments were more frequent with age, for emergency obstetric care and among women who work. The women’s health region of origin was also significantly associated with OOP payments. For those who made OOP payments, the amounts paid decreased with age but were higher in urban areas, in hospitals, and among the most educated women. The amounts paid were lower among students and were associated with health region. Conclusion The policy is effective for financial protection. However, improvements in the management and supply system of health facilities’ pharmacies could further reduce OOP payments in the context of the free health care policy in Burkina Faso.
topic Free care policy
Maternal care
Direct expenses
Out-of-pocket payment
Sub-Saharan
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13561-019-0228-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ivlabehirebertrandmeda outofpocketpaymentsinthecontextofafreematernalhealthcarepolicyinburkinafasoanationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT adamabaguiya outofpocketpaymentsinthecontextofafreematernalhealthcarepolicyinburkinafasoanationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT valeryridde outofpocketpaymentsinthecontextofafreematernalhealthcarepolicyinburkinafasoanationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT henrigautierouedraogo outofpocketpaymentsinthecontextofafreematernalhealthcarepolicyinburkinafasoanationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT alexandredumont outofpocketpaymentsinthecontextofafreematernalhealthcarepolicyinburkinafasoanationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT senikouanda outofpocketpaymentsinthecontextofafreematernalhealthcarepolicyinburkinafasoanationalcrosssectionalsurvey
_version_ 1724872186805616640