Evaluation of noise reduction rating of current earmuffs based on field microphone in real ear (FMIRE) in workplaces

Background and aims Nominal noise reduction rating of the earmuff manufacturers can be different compared with the actual noise attenuation rating. The current study aimed to determine the actual noise reduction rate of current hearing protection devices in the real workplaces using a field micropho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Azam Biabani, Mohsen Aliabadi, Rostam Golmohammadi, Maryam Farhadian, Reza Shahidi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2017-09-01
Series:Salāmat-i kār-i Īrān
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ioh.iums.ac.ir/article-1-1849-en.html
id doaj-d71aac4b07064a6e95089b2735f1724d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d71aac4b07064a6e95089b2735f1724d2021-01-29T16:43:36ZfasIran University of Medical SciencesSalāmat-i kār-i Īrān1735-51332228-74932017-09-01144121103Evaluation of noise reduction rating of current earmuffs based on field microphone in real ear (FMIRE) in workplacesAzam Biabani0Mohsen Aliabadi1Rostam Golmohammadi2Maryam Farhadian3Reza Shahidi4 Background and aims Nominal noise reduction rating of the earmuff manufacturers can be different compared with the actual noise attenuation rating. The current study aimed to determine the actual noise reduction rate of current hearing protection devices in the real workplaces using a field microphone in real ear method (FMIRE). Methods: In this cross-sectional study, five common earmuffs were studied in both industrial environments with different noise nature on the 50 workers who were selected randomly. Noise reduction ratings of ear muffs were measured based on the ISO 11904 standard, microphone in real ear method, using noise dosimeter (SVANTEK, model SV 102) equipped with a microphone SV 25 model which can install inside the ear. In addition, the knowledge, attitudes and performance of employees about hearing protection were assessed by the developed questionnaire. Data was analyzed by SPSS 21. Results: Independent of the type of noise exposure, actual insertion loss values for ear muffs in one octave-band frequency was less than the nominal insertion loss values. Actual noise reduction rates of the earmuffs in the exposed of dominant noise low frequency are less than the nominal reduction rates (p < 0.05). Actual noise reduction ratings of the earmuffs in the exposed of the high-frequency noise were above the nominal noise reduction ratings which its differences are not statistically significant (p< 0.05). The workerschr('39') knowledge, attitudes and performance index about hearing protection was within acceptable level. Conclusion: The frequency nature of noise is very impressive on the actual noise reduction rates can be achieved from earmuffs. Therefore, data about the frequency analysis of ambient noise is key ingredient when selecting hearing protectors in any workplaces. FMIRE could facilitate rapid and simple measurement of the actual acoustic performance of earmuffs in real conditions of industrial environments.http://ioh.iums.ac.ir/article-1-1849-en.htmlhearing protection devicesfield microphone in real earnoise reduction ratinginsertion loss
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Azam Biabani
Mohsen Aliabadi
Rostam Golmohammadi
Maryam Farhadian
Reza Shahidi
spellingShingle Azam Biabani
Mohsen Aliabadi
Rostam Golmohammadi
Maryam Farhadian
Reza Shahidi
Evaluation of noise reduction rating of current earmuffs based on field microphone in real ear (FMIRE) in workplaces
Salāmat-i kār-i Īrān
hearing protection devices
field microphone in real ear
noise reduction rating
insertion loss
author_facet Azam Biabani
Mohsen Aliabadi
Rostam Golmohammadi
Maryam Farhadian
Reza Shahidi
author_sort Azam Biabani
title Evaluation of noise reduction rating of current earmuffs based on field microphone in real ear (FMIRE) in workplaces
title_short Evaluation of noise reduction rating of current earmuffs based on field microphone in real ear (FMIRE) in workplaces
title_full Evaluation of noise reduction rating of current earmuffs based on field microphone in real ear (FMIRE) in workplaces
title_fullStr Evaluation of noise reduction rating of current earmuffs based on field microphone in real ear (FMIRE) in workplaces
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of noise reduction rating of current earmuffs based on field microphone in real ear (FMIRE) in workplaces
title_sort evaluation of noise reduction rating of current earmuffs based on field microphone in real ear (fmire) in workplaces
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
series Salāmat-i kār-i Īrān
issn 1735-5133
2228-7493
publishDate 2017-09-01
description Background and aims Nominal noise reduction rating of the earmuff manufacturers can be different compared with the actual noise attenuation rating. The current study aimed to determine the actual noise reduction rate of current hearing protection devices in the real workplaces using a field microphone in real ear method (FMIRE). Methods: In this cross-sectional study, five common earmuffs were studied in both industrial environments with different noise nature on the 50 workers who were selected randomly. Noise reduction ratings of ear muffs were measured based on the ISO 11904 standard, microphone in real ear method, using noise dosimeter (SVANTEK, model SV 102) equipped with a microphone SV 25 model which can install inside the ear. In addition, the knowledge, attitudes and performance of employees about hearing protection were assessed by the developed questionnaire. Data was analyzed by SPSS 21. Results: Independent of the type of noise exposure, actual insertion loss values for ear muffs in one octave-band frequency was less than the nominal insertion loss values. Actual noise reduction rates of the earmuffs in the exposed of dominant noise low frequency are less than the nominal reduction rates (p < 0.05). Actual noise reduction ratings of the earmuffs in the exposed of the high-frequency noise were above the nominal noise reduction ratings which its differences are not statistically significant (p< 0.05). The workerschr('39') knowledge, attitudes and performance index about hearing protection was within acceptable level. Conclusion: The frequency nature of noise is very impressive on the actual noise reduction rates can be achieved from earmuffs. Therefore, data about the frequency analysis of ambient noise is key ingredient when selecting hearing protectors in any workplaces. FMIRE could facilitate rapid and simple measurement of the actual acoustic performance of earmuffs in real conditions of industrial environments.
topic hearing protection devices
field microphone in real ear
noise reduction rating
insertion loss
url http://ioh.iums.ac.ir/article-1-1849-en.html
work_keys_str_mv AT azambiabani evaluationofnoisereductionratingofcurrentearmuffsbasedonfieldmicrophoneinrealearfmireinworkplaces
AT mohsenaliabadi evaluationofnoisereductionratingofcurrentearmuffsbasedonfieldmicrophoneinrealearfmireinworkplaces
AT rostamgolmohammadi evaluationofnoisereductionratingofcurrentearmuffsbasedonfieldmicrophoneinrealearfmireinworkplaces
AT maryamfarhadian evaluationofnoisereductionratingofcurrentearmuffsbasedonfieldmicrophoneinrealearfmireinworkplaces
AT rezashahidi evaluationofnoisereductionratingofcurrentearmuffsbasedonfieldmicrophoneinrealearfmireinworkplaces
_version_ 1724318766410498048