Camera recognition with deep learning

In this paper, camera recognition with the use of deep learning technique is introduced. To identify the various cameras, their characteristic photo-response non-uniformity (PRNU) noise pattern was extracted. In forensic science, it is important, especially for child pornography cases, to link a pho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eleni Athanasiadou, Zeno Geradts, Erwin Van Eijk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-07-01
Series:Forensic Sciences Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2018.1485198
id doaj-d72cd7fbf8144d33bd8a59c0ba56b3a9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d72cd7fbf8144d33bd8a59c0ba56b3a92020-11-24T21:44:28ZengTaylor & Francis GroupForensic Sciences Research2096-17902471-14112018-07-013321021810.1080/20961790.2018.14851981485198Camera recognition with deep learningEleni Athanasiadou0Zeno Geradts1Erwin Van Eijk2Department of Forensic Science University of Amsterdam, AmsterdamNetherlands Forensic Institute Den HaagNetherlands Forensic Institute Den HaagIn this paper, camera recognition with the use of deep learning technique is introduced. To identify the various cameras, their characteristic photo-response non-uniformity (PRNU) noise pattern was extracted. In forensic science, it is important, especially for child pornography cases, to link a photo or a set of photos to a specific camera. Deep learning is a sub-field of machine learning which trains the computer as a human brain to recognize similarities and differences by scanning it, in order to identify an object. The innovation of this research is the use of PRNU noise patterns and a deep learning technique in order to achieve camera identification. In this paper, AlexNet was modified producing an improved training procedure with high maximum accuracy of 80%–90%. DIGITS showed to have identified correctly six cameras out of 10 with a success rate higher than 75% in the database. However, many of the cameras were falsely identified indicating a fault occurring during the procedure. A possible explanation for this is that the PRNU signal is based on the quality of the sensor and the artefacts introduced during the production process of the camera. Some manufacturers may use the same or similar imaging sensors, which could result in similar PRNU noise patterns. In an attempt to form a database which contained different cameras of the same model as different categories, the accuracy rate was low. This provided further proof of the limitations of this technique, since PRNU is stochastic in nature and should be able to distinguish between different cameras from the same brand. Therefore, this study showed that current convolutional neural networks (CNNs) cannot achieve individualization with PRNU patterns. Nevertheless, the paper provided material for further research.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2018.1485198Forensic sciencescamera identificationclusteringindividualization deep learning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eleni Athanasiadou
Zeno Geradts
Erwin Van Eijk
spellingShingle Eleni Athanasiadou
Zeno Geradts
Erwin Van Eijk
Camera recognition with deep learning
Forensic Sciences Research
Forensic sciences
camera identification
clustering
individualization deep learning
author_facet Eleni Athanasiadou
Zeno Geradts
Erwin Van Eijk
author_sort Eleni Athanasiadou
title Camera recognition with deep learning
title_short Camera recognition with deep learning
title_full Camera recognition with deep learning
title_fullStr Camera recognition with deep learning
title_full_unstemmed Camera recognition with deep learning
title_sort camera recognition with deep learning
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Forensic Sciences Research
issn 2096-1790
2471-1411
publishDate 2018-07-01
description In this paper, camera recognition with the use of deep learning technique is introduced. To identify the various cameras, their characteristic photo-response non-uniformity (PRNU) noise pattern was extracted. In forensic science, it is important, especially for child pornography cases, to link a photo or a set of photos to a specific camera. Deep learning is a sub-field of machine learning which trains the computer as a human brain to recognize similarities and differences by scanning it, in order to identify an object. The innovation of this research is the use of PRNU noise patterns and a deep learning technique in order to achieve camera identification. In this paper, AlexNet was modified producing an improved training procedure with high maximum accuracy of 80%–90%. DIGITS showed to have identified correctly six cameras out of 10 with a success rate higher than 75% in the database. However, many of the cameras were falsely identified indicating a fault occurring during the procedure. A possible explanation for this is that the PRNU signal is based on the quality of the sensor and the artefacts introduced during the production process of the camera. Some manufacturers may use the same or similar imaging sensors, which could result in similar PRNU noise patterns. In an attempt to form a database which contained different cameras of the same model as different categories, the accuracy rate was low. This provided further proof of the limitations of this technique, since PRNU is stochastic in nature and should be able to distinguish between different cameras from the same brand. Therefore, this study showed that current convolutional neural networks (CNNs) cannot achieve individualization with PRNU patterns. Nevertheless, the paper provided material for further research.
topic Forensic sciences
camera identification
clustering
individualization deep learning
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2018.1485198
work_keys_str_mv AT eleniathanasiadou camerarecognitionwithdeeplearning
AT zenogeradts camerarecognitionwithdeeplearning
AT erwinvaneijk camerarecognitionwithdeeplearning
_version_ 1725909969740496896