Bridging granularity gaps to decarbonize large‐scale energy systems—The case of power system planning

Abstract The comprehensive evaluation of strategies for decarbonizing large‐scale energy systems requires insights from many different perspectives. In energy systems analysis, optimization models are widely used for this purpose. However, they are limited in incorporating all crucial aspects of suc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karl‐Kiên Cao, Jannik Haas, Evelyn Sperber, Shima Sasanpour, Seyedfarzad Sarfarazi, Thomas Pregger, Oussama Alaya, Hendrik Lens, Simon R. Drauz, Tanja M. Kneiske
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-08-01
Series:Energy Science & Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.891
id doaj-d7301dae55da4454a352f03718e33836
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d7301dae55da4454a352f03718e338362021-08-03T15:52:59ZengWileyEnergy Science & Engineering2050-05052021-08-01981052106010.1002/ese3.891Bridging granularity gaps to decarbonize large‐scale energy systems—The case of power system planningKarl‐Kiên Cao0Jannik Haas1Evelyn Sperber2Shima Sasanpour3Seyedfarzad Sarfarazi4Thomas Pregger5Oussama Alaya6Hendrik Lens7Simon R. Drauz8Tanja M. Kneiske9Department of Energy Systems Analysis Institute of Networked Energy Systems German Aerospace Center (DLR) Stuttgart GermanyDepartment of Energy Systems Analysis Institute of Networked Energy Systems German Aerospace Center (DLR) Stuttgart GermanyDepartment of Energy Systems Analysis Institute of Networked Energy Systems German Aerospace Center (DLR) Stuttgart GermanyDepartment of Energy Systems Analysis Institute of Networked Energy Systems German Aerospace Center (DLR) Stuttgart GermanyDepartment of Energy Systems Analysis Institute of Networked Energy Systems German Aerospace Center (DLR) Stuttgart GermanyDepartment of Energy Systems Analysis Institute of Networked Energy Systems German Aerospace Center (DLR) Stuttgart GermanyDepartment Power Generation and Automatic Control Institute of Combustion and Power Plant Technology (IFK) University of Stuttgart Stuttgart GermanyDepartment Power Generation and Automatic Control Institute of Combustion and Power Plant Technology (IFK) University of Stuttgart Stuttgart GermanyGrid Planning and Grid Operation Division Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Economics and Energy System Technology Kassel GermanyGrid Planning and Grid Operation Division Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Economics and Energy System Technology Kassel GermanyAbstract The comprehensive evaluation of strategies for decarbonizing large‐scale energy systems requires insights from many different perspectives. In energy systems analysis, optimization models are widely used for this purpose. However, they are limited in incorporating all crucial aspects of such a complex system to be sustainably transformed. Hence, they differ in terms of their spatial, temporal, technological, and economic perspective and either have a narrow focus with high resolution or a broad scope with little detail. Against this background, we introduce the so‐called granularity gaps and discuss two possibilities to address them: increasing the resolutions of the established optimization models, and the different kinds of model coupling. After laying out open challenges, we propose a novel framework to design power systems in particular. Our exemplary concept exploits the capabilities of power system optimization, transmission network simulation, distribution grid planning, and agent‐based simulation. This integrated framework can serve to study the energy transition with greater comprehensibility and may be a blueprint for similar multimodel analyses.https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.891decarbonizationdecentral flexibilityenergy system modelinggranularity gapsmodel couplingsecurity of supply
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karl‐Kiên Cao
Jannik Haas
Evelyn Sperber
Shima Sasanpour
Seyedfarzad Sarfarazi
Thomas Pregger
Oussama Alaya
Hendrik Lens
Simon R. Drauz
Tanja M. Kneiske
spellingShingle Karl‐Kiên Cao
Jannik Haas
Evelyn Sperber
Shima Sasanpour
Seyedfarzad Sarfarazi
Thomas Pregger
Oussama Alaya
Hendrik Lens
Simon R. Drauz
Tanja M. Kneiske
Bridging granularity gaps to decarbonize large‐scale energy systems—The case of power system planning
Energy Science & Engineering
decarbonization
decentral flexibility
energy system modeling
granularity gaps
model coupling
security of supply
author_facet Karl‐Kiên Cao
Jannik Haas
Evelyn Sperber
Shima Sasanpour
Seyedfarzad Sarfarazi
Thomas Pregger
Oussama Alaya
Hendrik Lens
Simon R. Drauz
Tanja M. Kneiske
author_sort Karl‐Kiên Cao
title Bridging granularity gaps to decarbonize large‐scale energy systems—The case of power system planning
title_short Bridging granularity gaps to decarbonize large‐scale energy systems—The case of power system planning
title_full Bridging granularity gaps to decarbonize large‐scale energy systems—The case of power system planning
title_fullStr Bridging granularity gaps to decarbonize large‐scale energy systems—The case of power system planning
title_full_unstemmed Bridging granularity gaps to decarbonize large‐scale energy systems—The case of power system planning
title_sort bridging granularity gaps to decarbonize large‐scale energy systems—the case of power system planning
publisher Wiley
series Energy Science & Engineering
issn 2050-0505
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Abstract The comprehensive evaluation of strategies for decarbonizing large‐scale energy systems requires insights from many different perspectives. In energy systems analysis, optimization models are widely used for this purpose. However, they are limited in incorporating all crucial aspects of such a complex system to be sustainably transformed. Hence, they differ in terms of their spatial, temporal, technological, and economic perspective and either have a narrow focus with high resolution or a broad scope with little detail. Against this background, we introduce the so‐called granularity gaps and discuss two possibilities to address them: increasing the resolutions of the established optimization models, and the different kinds of model coupling. After laying out open challenges, we propose a novel framework to design power systems in particular. Our exemplary concept exploits the capabilities of power system optimization, transmission network simulation, distribution grid planning, and agent‐based simulation. This integrated framework can serve to study the energy transition with greater comprehensibility and may be a blueprint for similar multimodel analyses.
topic decarbonization
decentral flexibility
energy system modeling
granularity gaps
model coupling
security of supply
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.891
work_keys_str_mv AT karlkiencao bridginggranularitygapstodecarbonizelargescaleenergysystemsthecaseofpowersystemplanning
AT jannikhaas bridginggranularitygapstodecarbonizelargescaleenergysystemsthecaseofpowersystemplanning
AT evelynsperber bridginggranularitygapstodecarbonizelargescaleenergysystemsthecaseofpowersystemplanning
AT shimasasanpour bridginggranularitygapstodecarbonizelargescaleenergysystemsthecaseofpowersystemplanning
AT seyedfarzadsarfarazi bridginggranularitygapstodecarbonizelargescaleenergysystemsthecaseofpowersystemplanning
AT thomaspregger bridginggranularitygapstodecarbonizelargescaleenergysystemsthecaseofpowersystemplanning
AT oussamaalaya bridginggranularitygapstodecarbonizelargescaleenergysystemsthecaseofpowersystemplanning
AT hendriklens bridginggranularitygapstodecarbonizelargescaleenergysystemsthecaseofpowersystemplanning
AT simonrdrauz bridginggranularitygapstodecarbonizelargescaleenergysystemsthecaseofpowersystemplanning
AT tanjamkneiske bridginggranularitygapstodecarbonizelargescaleenergysystemsthecaseofpowersystemplanning
_version_ 1721223165418405888