Proton therapy- the modality of choice for future radiation therapy management of Prostate Cancer?

Background: Proton Therapy (PR) is an emerging treatment for prostate cancer (Pca) patients. However, limited and conflicting data exists regarding its ability to result in fewer bladder and rectal toxicities compared to Photon Therapy (PT), as well as its cost efficiency and plan robustness. Materi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sophie Mangan, Michelle Leech
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-09-01
Series:Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632418300441
id doaj-d730837513e740c9a7cb3e3ba176b3e8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d730837513e740c9a7cb3e3ba176b3e82020-11-25T01:27:32ZengElsevierTechnical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology2405-63242019-09-0111113Proton therapy- the modality of choice for future radiation therapy management of Prostate Cancer?Sophie Mangan0Michelle Leech1Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, IrelandCorresponding author.; Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, IrelandBackground: Proton Therapy (PR) is an emerging treatment for prostate cancer (Pca) patients. However, limited and conflicting data exists regarding its ability to result in fewer bladder and rectal toxicities compared to Photon Therapy (PT), as well as its cost efficiency and plan robustness. Materials and Methods: An electronic literature search was performed to acquire eligible studies published between 2007 and 2018. Studies comparing bladder and rectal dosimetry or Gastrointestinal (GI) and Genitourinary (GU) toxicities between PR and PT, the plan robustness of PR relative to motion and its cost efficiency for Pca patients were assessed. Results: 28 studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. PR resulted in improved bladder and rectal dosimetry but did not manifest as improved GI/GU toxicities clinically compared to PT. PR plans were considered robust when specific corrections, techniques, positioning or immobilisation devices were applied. PR is not cost effective for intermediate risk Pca patients; however PR may be cost effective for younger or high risk Pca patients. Conclusion: PR offers improved bladder and rectal dosimetry compared to PT but this does not specifically translate to improved GI/GU toxicities clinically. The robustness of PR plans is acceptable under specific conditions. PR is not cost effective for all Pca patients. Keywords: Prostate cancer, Proton therapy, Photon therapyhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632418300441
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sophie Mangan
Michelle Leech
spellingShingle Sophie Mangan
Michelle Leech
Proton therapy- the modality of choice for future radiation therapy management of Prostate Cancer?
Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
author_facet Sophie Mangan
Michelle Leech
author_sort Sophie Mangan
title Proton therapy- the modality of choice for future radiation therapy management of Prostate Cancer?
title_short Proton therapy- the modality of choice for future radiation therapy management of Prostate Cancer?
title_full Proton therapy- the modality of choice for future radiation therapy management of Prostate Cancer?
title_fullStr Proton therapy- the modality of choice for future radiation therapy management of Prostate Cancer?
title_full_unstemmed Proton therapy- the modality of choice for future radiation therapy management of Prostate Cancer?
title_sort proton therapy- the modality of choice for future radiation therapy management of prostate cancer?
publisher Elsevier
series Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
issn 2405-6324
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Background: Proton Therapy (PR) is an emerging treatment for prostate cancer (Pca) patients. However, limited and conflicting data exists regarding its ability to result in fewer bladder and rectal toxicities compared to Photon Therapy (PT), as well as its cost efficiency and plan robustness. Materials and Methods: An electronic literature search was performed to acquire eligible studies published between 2007 and 2018. Studies comparing bladder and rectal dosimetry or Gastrointestinal (GI) and Genitourinary (GU) toxicities between PR and PT, the plan robustness of PR relative to motion and its cost efficiency for Pca patients were assessed. Results: 28 studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. PR resulted in improved bladder and rectal dosimetry but did not manifest as improved GI/GU toxicities clinically compared to PT. PR plans were considered robust when specific corrections, techniques, positioning or immobilisation devices were applied. PR is not cost effective for intermediate risk Pca patients; however PR may be cost effective for younger or high risk Pca patients. Conclusion: PR offers improved bladder and rectal dosimetry compared to PT but this does not specifically translate to improved GI/GU toxicities clinically. The robustness of PR plans is acceptable under specific conditions. PR is not cost effective for all Pca patients. Keywords: Prostate cancer, Proton therapy, Photon therapy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632418300441
work_keys_str_mv AT sophiemangan protontherapythemodalityofchoiceforfutureradiationtherapymanagementofprostatecancer
AT michelleleech protontherapythemodalityofchoiceforfutureradiationtherapymanagementofprostatecancer
_version_ 1725104899108110336