The Erez–Rosen Solution Versus the Hartle–Thorne Solution
In this work, we investigate the correspondence between the Erez−Rosen and Hartle−Thorne solutions. We explicitly show how to establish the relationship and find the coordinate transformations between the two metrics. For this purpose the two metrics must have the same approximat...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Symmetry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/11/10/1324 |
id |
doaj-d7972a6db8c746f8a07235d62419494d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d7972a6db8c746f8a07235d62419494d2020-11-25T01:56:45ZengMDPI AGSymmetry2073-89942019-10-011110132410.3390/sym11101324sym11101324The Erez–Rosen Solution Versus the Hartle–Thorne SolutionKuantay Boshkayev0Hernando Quevedo1Gulmira Nurbakyt2Algis Malybayev3Ainur Urazalina4National Nanotechnology Laboratory of Open Type, Department of Theoretical and Nuclear Physics, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, KazakhstanNational Nanotechnology Laboratory of Open Type, Department of Theoretical and Nuclear Physics, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, KazakhstanNational Nanotechnology Laboratory of Open Type, Department of Theoretical and Nuclear Physics, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, KazakhstanNational Nanotechnology Laboratory of Open Type, Department of Theoretical and Nuclear Physics, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, KazakhstanNational Nanotechnology Laboratory of Open Type, Department of Theoretical and Nuclear Physics, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, KazakhstanIn this work, we investigate the correspondence between the Erez−Rosen and Hartle−Thorne solutions. We explicitly show how to establish the relationship and find the coordinate transformations between the two metrics. For this purpose the two metrics must have the same approximation and describe the gravitational field of static objects. Since both the Erez−Rosen and the Hartle−Thorne solutions are particular solutions of a more general solution, the Zipoy−Voorhees transformation is applied to the exact Erez−Rosen metric in order to obtain a generalized solution in terms of the Zipoy−Voorhees parameter <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo> <mi>s</mi> <mi>q</mi> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>. The Geroch−Hansen multipole moments of the generalized Erez−Rosen metric are calculated to find the definition of the total mass and quadrupole moment in terms of the mass <i>m</i>, quadrupole <i>q</i> and Zipoy−Voorhees <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi>δ</mi> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> parameters. The coordinate transformations between the metrics are found in the approximation of ∼q. It is shown that the Zipoy−Voorhees parameter is equal to <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>−</mo> <mi>q</mi> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> with <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>. This result is in agreement with previous results in the literature.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/11/10/1324vacuum solutionsquadrupole momentcoordinate transformations |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kuantay Boshkayev Hernando Quevedo Gulmira Nurbakyt Algis Malybayev Ainur Urazalina |
spellingShingle |
Kuantay Boshkayev Hernando Quevedo Gulmira Nurbakyt Algis Malybayev Ainur Urazalina The Erez–Rosen Solution Versus the Hartle–Thorne Solution Symmetry vacuum solutions quadrupole moment coordinate transformations |
author_facet |
Kuantay Boshkayev Hernando Quevedo Gulmira Nurbakyt Algis Malybayev Ainur Urazalina |
author_sort |
Kuantay Boshkayev |
title |
The Erez–Rosen Solution Versus the Hartle–Thorne Solution |
title_short |
The Erez–Rosen Solution Versus the Hartle–Thorne Solution |
title_full |
The Erez–Rosen Solution Versus the Hartle–Thorne Solution |
title_fullStr |
The Erez–Rosen Solution Versus the Hartle–Thorne Solution |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Erez–Rosen Solution Versus the Hartle–Thorne Solution |
title_sort |
erez–rosen solution versus the hartle–thorne solution |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Symmetry |
issn |
2073-8994 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
In this work, we investigate the correspondence between the Erez−Rosen and Hartle−Thorne solutions. We explicitly show how to establish the relationship and find the coordinate transformations between the two metrics. For this purpose the two metrics must have the same approximation and describe the gravitational field of static objects. Since both the Erez−Rosen and the Hartle−Thorne solutions are particular solutions of a more general solution, the Zipoy−Voorhees transformation is applied to the exact Erez−Rosen metric in order to obtain a generalized solution in terms of the Zipoy−Voorhees parameter <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo> <mi>s</mi> <mi>q</mi> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>. The Geroch−Hansen multipole moments of the generalized Erez−Rosen metric are calculated to find the definition of the total mass and quadrupole moment in terms of the mass <i>m</i>, quadrupole <i>q</i> and Zipoy−Voorhees <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi>δ</mi> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> parameters. The coordinate transformations between the metrics are found in the approximation of ∼q. It is shown that the Zipoy−Voorhees parameter is equal to <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>−</mo> <mi>q</mi> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> with <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>. This result is in agreement with previous results in the literature. |
topic |
vacuum solutions quadrupole moment coordinate transformations |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/11/10/1324 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kuantayboshkayev theerezrosensolutionversusthehartlethornesolution AT hernandoquevedo theerezrosensolutionversusthehartlethornesolution AT gulmiranurbakyt theerezrosensolutionversusthehartlethornesolution AT algismalybayev theerezrosensolutionversusthehartlethornesolution AT ainururazalina theerezrosensolutionversusthehartlethornesolution AT kuantayboshkayev erezrosensolutionversusthehartlethornesolution AT hernandoquevedo erezrosensolutionversusthehartlethornesolution AT gulmiranurbakyt erezrosensolutionversusthehartlethornesolution AT algismalybayev erezrosensolutionversusthehartlethornesolution AT ainururazalina erezrosensolutionversusthehartlethornesolution |
_version_ |
1724978091712839680 |