Port Cooperation and Bundling: A Way to Reduce the External Costs of Hinterland Transport

The present paper studies the bundling of road cargo flows of neighbouring seaports to a common hinterland. In specific cases, some hinterland flows can be too small to make bundling in a sufficient frequency possible. By combining the road freight flows of neighbouring ports, this problem can be so...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joost Hintjens, Edwin van Hassel, Thierry Vanelslander, Eddy Van de Voorde
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/9983
id doaj-d7ca49650cc14cb89f8ec1070c89fe99
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d7ca49650cc14cb89f8ec1070c89fe992020-11-30T00:01:28ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-11-01129983998310.3390/su12239983Port Cooperation and Bundling: A Way to Reduce the External Costs of Hinterland TransportJoost Hintjens0Edwin van Hassel1Thierry Vanelslander2Eddy Van de Voorde3Department TPR, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, BelgiumDepartment TPR, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, BelgiumDepartment TPR, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, BelgiumDepartment TPR, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, BelgiumThe present paper studies the bundling of road cargo flows of neighbouring seaports to a common hinterland. In specific cases, some hinterland flows can be too small to make bundling in a sufficient frequency possible. By combining the road freight flows of neighbouring ports, this problem can be solved. However, the additional cost of bundling and the loss of time need to be compensated for by a lower transport cost. The paper presents an empirical model for the 104 core Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) ports of the European Union (EU) and their 271 NUTS2 (Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics) hinterland regions that allows identifying opportunities for bundling as well as the direct and external cost effects. By including the value of time (VOT) of each transport mode, the generalised cost is also calculated. The result is a business model that helps port authorities, and other port actors, to identify bundling projects that will lower the direct, generalised and external costs of the hinterland connectivity, thus increasing the port attractiveness for port users as well as lowering potential aversion by the surrounding community to port operations that create hinterland nuisance.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/9983seaportcooperationwelfare effectsbundlinghinterlandTEN-T
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joost Hintjens
Edwin van Hassel
Thierry Vanelslander
Eddy Van de Voorde
spellingShingle Joost Hintjens
Edwin van Hassel
Thierry Vanelslander
Eddy Van de Voorde
Port Cooperation and Bundling: A Way to Reduce the External Costs of Hinterland Transport
Sustainability
seaport
cooperation
welfare effects
bundling
hinterland
TEN-T
author_facet Joost Hintjens
Edwin van Hassel
Thierry Vanelslander
Eddy Van de Voorde
author_sort Joost Hintjens
title Port Cooperation and Bundling: A Way to Reduce the External Costs of Hinterland Transport
title_short Port Cooperation and Bundling: A Way to Reduce the External Costs of Hinterland Transport
title_full Port Cooperation and Bundling: A Way to Reduce the External Costs of Hinterland Transport
title_fullStr Port Cooperation and Bundling: A Way to Reduce the External Costs of Hinterland Transport
title_full_unstemmed Port Cooperation and Bundling: A Way to Reduce the External Costs of Hinterland Transport
title_sort port cooperation and bundling: a way to reduce the external costs of hinterland transport
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-11-01
description The present paper studies the bundling of road cargo flows of neighbouring seaports to a common hinterland. In specific cases, some hinterland flows can be too small to make bundling in a sufficient frequency possible. By combining the road freight flows of neighbouring ports, this problem can be solved. However, the additional cost of bundling and the loss of time need to be compensated for by a lower transport cost. The paper presents an empirical model for the 104 core Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) ports of the European Union (EU) and their 271 NUTS2 (Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics) hinterland regions that allows identifying opportunities for bundling as well as the direct and external cost effects. By including the value of time (VOT) of each transport mode, the generalised cost is also calculated. The result is a business model that helps port authorities, and other port actors, to identify bundling projects that will lower the direct, generalised and external costs of the hinterland connectivity, thus increasing the port attractiveness for port users as well as lowering potential aversion by the surrounding community to port operations that create hinterland nuisance.
topic seaport
cooperation
welfare effects
bundling
hinterland
TEN-T
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/9983
work_keys_str_mv AT joosthintjens portcooperationandbundlingawaytoreducetheexternalcostsofhinterlandtransport
AT edwinvanhassel portcooperationandbundlingawaytoreducetheexternalcostsofhinterlandtransport
AT thierryvanelslander portcooperationandbundlingawaytoreducetheexternalcostsofhinterlandtransport
AT eddyvandevoorde portcooperationandbundlingawaytoreducetheexternalcostsofhinterlandtransport
_version_ 1724411825720655872