Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III
A comprehensive evaluation of eight signal pre-processing strategies, including directional microphones, coherence filters, single-channel noise reduction, binaural beamformers, and their combinations, was undertaken with normal-hearing (NH) and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners. Speech reception thre...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2015-12-01
|
Series: | Trends in Hearing |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216515618609 |
id |
doaj-d817922cb38a481d9978aa5403dac9b8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d817922cb38a481d9978aa5403dac9b82020-11-25T03:28:29ZengSAGE PublishingTrends in Hearing2331-21652015-12-011910.1177/233121651561860910.1177_2331216515618609Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies IIIChristoph Völker0Anna Warzybok1Stephan M. A. Ernst2Cluster of Excellence “Hearing4all,” Oldenburg, GermanyCluster of Excellence “Hearing4all,” Oldenburg, GermanyCluster of Excellence “Hearing4all,” Oldenburg, GermanyA comprehensive evaluation of eight signal pre-processing strategies, including directional microphones, coherence filters, single-channel noise reduction, binaural beamformers, and their combinations, was undertaken with normal-hearing (NH) and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured in three noise scenarios (multitalker babble, cafeteria noise, and single competing talker). Predictions of three common instrumental measures were compared with the general perceptual benefit caused by the algorithms. The individual SRTs measured without pre-processing and individual benefits were objectively estimated using the binaural speech intelligibility model. Ten listeners with NH and 12 HI listeners participated. The participants varied in age and pure-tone threshold levels. Although HI listeners required a better signal-to-noise ratio to obtain 50% intelligibility than listeners with NH, no differences in SRT benefit from the different algorithms were found between the two groups. With the exception of single-channel noise reduction, all algorithms showed an improvement in SRT of between 2.1 dB (in cafeteria noise) and 4.8 dB (in single competing talker condition). Model predictions with binaural speech intelligibility model explained 83% of the measured variance of the individual SRTs in the no pre-processing condition. Regarding the benefit from the algorithms, the instrumental measures were not able to predict the perceptual data in all tested noise conditions. The comparable benefit observed for both groups suggests a possible application of noise reduction schemes for listeners with different hearing status. Although the model can predict the individual SRTs without pre-processing, further development is necessary to predict the benefits obtained from the algorithms at an individual level.https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216515618609 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Christoph Völker Anna Warzybok Stephan M. A. Ernst |
spellingShingle |
Christoph Völker Anna Warzybok Stephan M. A. Ernst Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III Trends in Hearing |
author_facet |
Christoph Völker Anna Warzybok Stephan M. A. Ernst |
author_sort |
Christoph Völker |
title |
Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III |
title_short |
Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III |
title_full |
Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III |
title_fullStr |
Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III |
title_sort |
comparing binaural pre-processing strategies iii |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Trends in Hearing |
issn |
2331-2165 |
publishDate |
2015-12-01 |
description |
A comprehensive evaluation of eight signal pre-processing strategies, including directional microphones, coherence filters, single-channel noise reduction, binaural beamformers, and their combinations, was undertaken with normal-hearing (NH) and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured in three noise scenarios (multitalker babble, cafeteria noise, and single competing talker). Predictions of three common instrumental measures were compared with the general perceptual benefit caused by the algorithms. The individual SRTs measured without pre-processing and individual benefits were objectively estimated using the binaural speech intelligibility model. Ten listeners with NH and 12 HI listeners participated. The participants varied in age and pure-tone threshold levels. Although HI listeners required a better signal-to-noise ratio to obtain 50% intelligibility than listeners with NH, no differences in SRT benefit from the different algorithms were found between the two groups. With the exception of single-channel noise reduction, all algorithms showed an improvement in SRT of between 2.1 dB (in cafeteria noise) and 4.8 dB (in single competing talker condition). Model predictions with binaural speech intelligibility model explained 83% of the measured variance of the individual SRTs in the no pre-processing condition. Regarding the benefit from the algorithms, the instrumental measures were not able to predict the perceptual data in all tested noise conditions. The comparable benefit observed for both groups suggests a possible application of noise reduction schemes for listeners with different hearing status. Although the model can predict the individual SRTs without pre-processing, further development is necessary to predict the benefits obtained from the algorithms at an individual level. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216515618609 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT christophvolker comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiii AT annawarzybok comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiii AT stephanmaernst comparingbinauralpreprocessingstrategiesiii |
_version_ |
1724583921140629504 |