Sports ingroup love does not make me like the sponsor's beverage but gets me buying it.

Previous literature has shown that social identity influences consumer decision-making towards branded products. However, its influence on ones' own sensory perception of an ingroup (or outgroup) associated brand's product (i.e. sponsor) is seldom documented and little understood. Here, we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sara Franco, Ana Maria Abreu, Rui Biscaia, Sandra Gama
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254940
id doaj-d83e79bc277e4d41a7f1a35fc26fd081
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d83e79bc277e4d41a7f1a35fc26fd0812021-08-03T04:31:39ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01167e025494010.1371/journal.pone.0254940Sports ingroup love does not make me like the sponsor's beverage but gets me buying it.Sara FrancoAna Maria AbreuRui BiscaiaSandra GamaPrevious literature has shown that social identity influences consumer decision-making towards branded products. However, its influence on ones' own sensory perception of an ingroup (or outgroup) associated brand's product (i.e. sponsor) is seldom documented and little understood. Here, we investigate the impact of social identity (i.e. team identification) with a football team on the sensorial experience and willingness to buy a beverage, said to be sponsoring the ingroup or the outgroup team. Ninety subjects participated in one of three sensorial experience conditions (matched identity: ingroup beverage; mismatched identity: outgroup beverage; control: no group preference). Each participant tasted the new sponsoring beverage and answered a questionnaire about their subjective sensorial experience of the beverage. EEG and BVP were synchronously collected throughout. Analyses revealed that team identification does not influence subjective responses and only slightly modulates physiological signals. All participants reported high valence and arousal values while physiological signals consistently translated negative affects across groups, which showed that participants reported to be happy/excited about trying the beverage while their physiological signals showed that they were feeling sad/depressed/angry. Crucially, despite a similar sensorial experience, and similar socially desirable report of the subjective experience, only participants in the matched identity group demonstrate higher willingness to buy, showing that the level of team identification, but not taste or beverage quality, influences willingness to buy the said sponsor's product.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254940
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sara Franco
Ana Maria Abreu
Rui Biscaia
Sandra Gama
spellingShingle Sara Franco
Ana Maria Abreu
Rui Biscaia
Sandra Gama
Sports ingroup love does not make me like the sponsor's beverage but gets me buying it.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Sara Franco
Ana Maria Abreu
Rui Biscaia
Sandra Gama
author_sort Sara Franco
title Sports ingroup love does not make me like the sponsor's beverage but gets me buying it.
title_short Sports ingroup love does not make me like the sponsor's beverage but gets me buying it.
title_full Sports ingroup love does not make me like the sponsor's beverage but gets me buying it.
title_fullStr Sports ingroup love does not make me like the sponsor's beverage but gets me buying it.
title_full_unstemmed Sports ingroup love does not make me like the sponsor's beverage but gets me buying it.
title_sort sports ingroup love does not make me like the sponsor's beverage but gets me buying it.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Previous literature has shown that social identity influences consumer decision-making towards branded products. However, its influence on ones' own sensory perception of an ingroup (or outgroup) associated brand's product (i.e. sponsor) is seldom documented and little understood. Here, we investigate the impact of social identity (i.e. team identification) with a football team on the sensorial experience and willingness to buy a beverage, said to be sponsoring the ingroup or the outgroup team. Ninety subjects participated in one of three sensorial experience conditions (matched identity: ingroup beverage; mismatched identity: outgroup beverage; control: no group preference). Each participant tasted the new sponsoring beverage and answered a questionnaire about their subjective sensorial experience of the beverage. EEG and BVP were synchronously collected throughout. Analyses revealed that team identification does not influence subjective responses and only slightly modulates physiological signals. All participants reported high valence and arousal values while physiological signals consistently translated negative affects across groups, which showed that participants reported to be happy/excited about trying the beverage while their physiological signals showed that they were feeling sad/depressed/angry. Crucially, despite a similar sensorial experience, and similar socially desirable report of the subjective experience, only participants in the matched identity group demonstrate higher willingness to buy, showing that the level of team identification, but not taste or beverage quality, influences willingness to buy the said sponsor's product.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254940
work_keys_str_mv AT sarafranco sportsingrouplovedoesnotmakemelikethesponsorsbeveragebutgetsmebuyingit
AT anamariaabreu sportsingrouplovedoesnotmakemelikethesponsorsbeveragebutgetsmebuyingit
AT ruibiscaia sportsingrouplovedoesnotmakemelikethesponsorsbeveragebutgetsmebuyingit
AT sandragama sportsingrouplovedoesnotmakemelikethesponsorsbeveragebutgetsmebuyingit
_version_ 1721224120349229056