Assessment of Thailand’s Energy Policies and CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions: Analyses of Energy Efficiency Measures and Renewable Power Generation

This study assesses Thailand’s energy policies on renewable electricity generation and energy efficiency in industries and buildings. The CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from power generation expansion plans (PGEPs) are also evaluated. The PGEPs of CO<sub>2<...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kamphol Promjiraprawat, Bundit Limmeechokchai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2012-08-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/5/8/3074
id doaj-d85c72fc269f4579a5ca648c9a15a634
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d85c72fc269f4579a5ca648c9a15a6342020-11-24T23:48:41ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732012-08-01583074309310.3390/en5083074Assessment of Thailand’s Energy Policies and CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions: Analyses of Energy Efficiency Measures and Renewable Power GenerationKamphol PromjiraprawatBundit LimmeechokchaiThis study assesses Thailand’s energy policies on renewable electricity generation and energy efficiency in industries and buildings. The CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from power generation expansion plans (PGEPs) are also evaluated. The PGEPs of CO<sub>2</sub> reduction targets of 20% and 40% emissions are also evaluated. Since 2008 Thai government has proposed the Alternative Energy Development Plan (AEDP) for renewable energy utilization. Results from energy efficiency measures indicate total cost saving of 1.34% and cumulative CO<sub>2</sub> emission reduction of 59 Mt-CO<sub>2</sub> in 2030 when compared to the business-as-usual (BAU) scenario. It was found that subsidies in the AEDP will promote renewable energy utilization and provide substantial CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation. As a co-benefit, fuel import vulnerability can be improved by 27.31% and 14.27% for CO<sub>2</sub> reduction targets of 20% and 40%, respectively.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/5/8/3074power generation expansion planning (PGEP)CO<sub>2</sub> mitigationemission reduction targetsfuel import vulnerability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kamphol Promjiraprawat
Bundit Limmeechokchai
spellingShingle Kamphol Promjiraprawat
Bundit Limmeechokchai
Assessment of Thailand’s Energy Policies and CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions: Analyses of Energy Efficiency Measures and Renewable Power Generation
Energies
power generation expansion planning (PGEP)
CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation
emission reduction targets
fuel import vulnerability
author_facet Kamphol Promjiraprawat
Bundit Limmeechokchai
author_sort Kamphol Promjiraprawat
title Assessment of Thailand’s Energy Policies and CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions: Analyses of Energy Efficiency Measures and Renewable Power Generation
title_short Assessment of Thailand’s Energy Policies and CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions: Analyses of Energy Efficiency Measures and Renewable Power Generation
title_full Assessment of Thailand’s Energy Policies and CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions: Analyses of Energy Efficiency Measures and Renewable Power Generation
title_fullStr Assessment of Thailand’s Energy Policies and CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions: Analyses of Energy Efficiency Measures and Renewable Power Generation
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Thailand’s Energy Policies and CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions: Analyses of Energy Efficiency Measures and Renewable Power Generation
title_sort assessment of thailand’s energy policies and co<sub>2</sub> emissions: analyses of energy efficiency measures and renewable power generation
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2012-08-01
description This study assesses Thailand’s energy policies on renewable electricity generation and energy efficiency in industries and buildings. The CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from power generation expansion plans (PGEPs) are also evaluated. The PGEPs of CO<sub>2</sub> reduction targets of 20% and 40% emissions are also evaluated. Since 2008 Thai government has proposed the Alternative Energy Development Plan (AEDP) for renewable energy utilization. Results from energy efficiency measures indicate total cost saving of 1.34% and cumulative CO<sub>2</sub> emission reduction of 59 Mt-CO<sub>2</sub> in 2030 when compared to the business-as-usual (BAU) scenario. It was found that subsidies in the AEDP will promote renewable energy utilization and provide substantial CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation. As a co-benefit, fuel import vulnerability can be improved by 27.31% and 14.27% for CO<sub>2</sub> reduction targets of 20% and 40%, respectively.
topic power generation expansion planning (PGEP)
CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation
emission reduction targets
fuel import vulnerability
url http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/5/8/3074
work_keys_str_mv AT kampholpromjiraprawat assessmentofthailandsenergypoliciesandcoltsubgt2ltsubgtemissionsanalysesofenergyefficiencymeasuresandrenewablepowergeneration
AT bunditlimmeechokchai assessmentofthailandsenergypoliciesandcoltsubgt2ltsubgtemissionsanalysesofenergyefficiencymeasuresandrenewablepowergeneration
_version_ 1725485120936214528