Comparative effectiveness of adding weight control simultaneously or sequentially to smoking cessation quitlines: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Prevalence of multiple health risk behaviors is growing, and obesity and smoking are costly. Weight gain associated with quitting smoking is common and can interfere with quit success. Efficacy of adding weight management to tobacco cessation treatment has been tested with women...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Terry Bush, Jennifer Lovejoy, Harold Javitz, Brooke Magnusson, Alula Jimenez Torres, Stacey Mahuna, Cody Benedict, Ken Wassum, Bonnie Spring
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2016-07-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3231-6
id doaj-d87a6ba66dcb4a3399406d3b2bbfbbd0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d87a6ba66dcb4a3399406d3b2bbfbbd02020-11-24T22:12:51ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582016-07-0116111210.1186/s12889-016-3231-6Comparative effectiveness of adding weight control simultaneously or sequentially to smoking cessation quitlines: study protocol of a randomized controlled trialTerry Bush0Jennifer Lovejoy1Harold Javitz2Brooke Magnusson3Alula Jimenez Torres4Stacey Mahuna5Cody Benedict6Ken Wassum7Bonnie Spring8Alere Wellbeing (now Optum)Arivale, Inc. and University of Washington School of Public HealthSRI InternationalAlere Wellbeing (now Optum)Alere Wellbeing (now Optum)Alere Wellbeing (now Optum)Bill and Melinda Gates FoundationAlere Wellbeing (now Optum)Center for Behavior and Health, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern UniversityAbstract Background Prevalence of multiple health risk behaviors is growing, and obesity and smoking are costly. Weight gain associated with quitting smoking is common and can interfere with quit success. Efficacy of adding weight management to tobacco cessation treatment has been tested with women in group sessions over an extended period of time, but has never been tested in real-world settings with men and women seeking help to quit. This paper describes the Best Quit study which tests the effectiveness of delivering tobacco and weight control interventions via existing quitline infrastructures. Methods Eligible and consenting smokers (n = 2550) who call a telephone quitline will be randomized to one of three groups; the standard quitline or standard quitline plus a weight management program added either simultaneously or sequentially to the tobacco program. The study aims to test: 1) the effectiveness of the combined intervention on smoking cessation and weight, 2) the cost-effectiveness of the combined intervention on cessation and weight and 3) theoretically pre-specified mediators of treatment effects on cessation: reduced weight concerns, increased outcome expectancies about quitting and improved self-efficacy about quitting without weight gain. Baseline, 6 month and 12 month data will be analyzed using multivariate statistical analyses and groups will be compared on treatment adherence, quit rates and change in weight among abstinent participants. To determine if the association between group assignment and primary outcomes (30-day abstinence and change in weight at 6 months) is moderated by pre-determined baseline and process measures, interaction terms will be included in the regression models and their significance assessed. Discussion This study will generate information to inform whether adding weight management to a tobacco cessation intervention delivered by phone, mail and web for smokers seeking help to quit will help or harm quit rates and whether a simultaneous or sequential approach is better at increasing abstinence and reducing weight gain post quit. If proven effective, the combined intervention could be disseminated across the U.S. through quitlines and could encourage additional smokers who have not sought cessation treatment for fear of gaining weight to make quit attempts. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01867983 . Registered: May 30, 2013http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3231-6SmokingWeight managementCombined treatmentSimultaneousSequentialQuitlines
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Terry Bush
Jennifer Lovejoy
Harold Javitz
Brooke Magnusson
Alula Jimenez Torres
Stacey Mahuna
Cody Benedict
Ken Wassum
Bonnie Spring
spellingShingle Terry Bush
Jennifer Lovejoy
Harold Javitz
Brooke Magnusson
Alula Jimenez Torres
Stacey Mahuna
Cody Benedict
Ken Wassum
Bonnie Spring
Comparative effectiveness of adding weight control simultaneously or sequentially to smoking cessation quitlines: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
BMC Public Health
Smoking
Weight management
Combined treatment
Simultaneous
Sequential
Quitlines
author_facet Terry Bush
Jennifer Lovejoy
Harold Javitz
Brooke Magnusson
Alula Jimenez Torres
Stacey Mahuna
Cody Benedict
Ken Wassum
Bonnie Spring
author_sort Terry Bush
title Comparative effectiveness of adding weight control simultaneously or sequentially to smoking cessation quitlines: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparative effectiveness of adding weight control simultaneously or sequentially to smoking cessation quitlines: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparative effectiveness of adding weight control simultaneously or sequentially to smoking cessation quitlines: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of adding weight control simultaneously or sequentially to smoking cessation quitlines: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of adding weight control simultaneously or sequentially to smoking cessation quitlines: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparative effectiveness of adding weight control simultaneously or sequentially to smoking cessation quitlines: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2016-07-01
description Abstract Background Prevalence of multiple health risk behaviors is growing, and obesity and smoking are costly. Weight gain associated with quitting smoking is common and can interfere with quit success. Efficacy of adding weight management to tobacco cessation treatment has been tested with women in group sessions over an extended period of time, but has never been tested in real-world settings with men and women seeking help to quit. This paper describes the Best Quit study which tests the effectiveness of delivering tobacco and weight control interventions via existing quitline infrastructures. Methods Eligible and consenting smokers (n = 2550) who call a telephone quitline will be randomized to one of three groups; the standard quitline or standard quitline plus a weight management program added either simultaneously or sequentially to the tobacco program. The study aims to test: 1) the effectiveness of the combined intervention on smoking cessation and weight, 2) the cost-effectiveness of the combined intervention on cessation and weight and 3) theoretically pre-specified mediators of treatment effects on cessation: reduced weight concerns, increased outcome expectancies about quitting and improved self-efficacy about quitting without weight gain. Baseline, 6 month and 12 month data will be analyzed using multivariate statistical analyses and groups will be compared on treatment adherence, quit rates and change in weight among abstinent participants. To determine if the association between group assignment and primary outcomes (30-day abstinence and change in weight at 6 months) is moderated by pre-determined baseline and process measures, interaction terms will be included in the regression models and their significance assessed. Discussion This study will generate information to inform whether adding weight management to a tobacco cessation intervention delivered by phone, mail and web for smokers seeking help to quit will help or harm quit rates and whether a simultaneous or sequential approach is better at increasing abstinence and reducing weight gain post quit. If proven effective, the combined intervention could be disseminated across the U.S. through quitlines and could encourage additional smokers who have not sought cessation treatment for fear of gaining weight to make quit attempts. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01867983 . Registered: May 30, 2013
topic Smoking
Weight management
Combined treatment
Simultaneous
Sequential
Quitlines
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3231-6
work_keys_str_mv AT terrybush comparativeeffectivenessofaddingweightcontrolsimultaneouslyorsequentiallytosmokingcessationquitlinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jenniferlovejoy comparativeeffectivenessofaddingweightcontrolsimultaneouslyorsequentiallytosmokingcessationquitlinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT haroldjavitz comparativeeffectivenessofaddingweightcontrolsimultaneouslyorsequentiallytosmokingcessationquitlinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brookemagnusson comparativeeffectivenessofaddingweightcontrolsimultaneouslyorsequentiallytosmokingcessationquitlinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT alulajimeneztorres comparativeeffectivenessofaddingweightcontrolsimultaneouslyorsequentiallytosmokingcessationquitlinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT staceymahuna comparativeeffectivenessofaddingweightcontrolsimultaneouslyorsequentiallytosmokingcessationquitlinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT codybenedict comparativeeffectivenessofaddingweightcontrolsimultaneouslyorsequentiallytosmokingcessationquitlinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kenwassum comparativeeffectivenessofaddingweightcontrolsimultaneouslyorsequentiallytosmokingcessationquitlinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bonniespring comparativeeffectivenessofaddingweightcontrolsimultaneouslyorsequentiallytosmokingcessationquitlinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1725802132051853312