Age and Gleason score upgrading between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy. Is this still true in the mp-MRI era?
Main Authors: | F. Pellegrino, A. Stabile, R.J. Karnes, G. Motterle, N. Fossati, G. Gandaglia, F. Barletta, S. Scuderi, V. Cucchiara, D. Robesti, A. Rizzo, E. Mazzone, G. Rosiello, C.A. Bravi, R. Leni, M. Moschini, G. Brembilla, A. Esposito, P.I. Karakiewicz, F. Montorsi, F. De Cobelli, A. Briganti |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-10-01
|
Series: | European Urology Open Science |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168320353751 |
Similar Items
-
Are men with low risk prostate cancer but high PIRADS score lesions at mp-MRI still candidate for active surveillance? Results from a large, multi-institutional radical prostatectomy series
by: A. Stabile, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Multiparametric MRI of the prostate significantly underestimates tumor volume of small visible lesions. Implications for tailored focal therapy approaches
by: A. Stabile, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Are men with low risk prostate cancer but high pirads score lesions at mp-MRI still candidate for active surveillance? Results from a large, multi-institutional radical prostatectomy series
by: F. Pellegrino, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
Should we target all visible areas at mpMRI suspicious for clinically significant prostate cancer in addition to the index lesion? Results from a two-institution series
by: F. Scalvi, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
When to omit lymphadenectomy during radical prostatectomy in patients with clinical localized prostate cancer: A clinical net benefit analysis weighting staging accuracy, risk of morbidity and life expectancy
by: A. Larcher, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)