Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRI

Background: Few studies have been conducted that have compared electrical source localization (ESL) results obtained by analyzing ictal patterns in scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) with the brain areas that are found to be responsible for seizures using other brain imaging techniques. Additionally,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gülsüm Akdeniz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.annalsofian.org/article.asp?issn=0972-2327;year=2016;volume=19;issue=1;spage=37;epage=43;aulast=Akdeniz
id doaj-d8fb3fa560ce48129306ac2d00cc1cf0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d8fb3fa560ce48129306ac2d00cc1cf02020-11-24T21:15:30ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurology0972-23271998-35492016-01-01191374310.4103/0972-2327.168632Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRIGülsüm AkdenizBackground: Few studies have been conducted that have compared electrical source localization (ESL) results obtained by analyzing ictal patterns in scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) with the brain areas that are found to be responsible for seizures using other brain imaging techniques. Additionally, adequate studies have not been performed to confirm the accuracy of ESL methods. Materials and Methods: In this study, ESL was conducted using LORETA (Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography) in 9 patients with lesions apparent on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and in 6 patients who did not exhibit lesions on their MRIs. EEGs of patients who underwent surgery for epilepsy and had follow-ups for at least 1 year after operations were analyzed for ictal spike, rhythmic, paroxysmal fast, and obscured EEG activities. Epileptogenic zones identified in postoperative MRIs were then compared with localizations obtained by LORETA model we employed. Results: We found that brain areas determined via ESL were in concordance with resected brain areas for 13 of the 15 patients evaluated, and those 13 patients were post-operatively determined as being seizure-free. Conclusion: ESL, which is a noninvasive technique, may contribute to the correct delineation of epileptogenic zones in patients who will eventually undergo surgery to treat epilepsy, (regardless of neuroimaging status). Moreover, ESL may aid in deciding on the number and localization of intracranial electrodes to be used in patients who are candidates for invasive recording.http://www.annalsofian.org/article.asp?issn=0972-2327;year=2016;volume=19;issue=1;spage=37;epage=43;aulast=AkdenizEpilepsyepileptogenic zoneLORETApostoperative MRIsource localization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gülsüm Akdeniz
spellingShingle Gülsüm Akdeniz
Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRI
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
Epilepsy
epileptogenic zone
LORETA
postoperative MRI
source localization
author_facet Gülsüm Akdeniz
author_sort Gülsüm Akdeniz
title Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRI
title_short Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRI
title_full Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRI
title_fullStr Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRI
title_full_unstemmed Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRI
title_sort electrical source localization by loreta in patients with epilepsy: confirmation by postoperative mri
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
issn 0972-2327
1998-3549
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Background: Few studies have been conducted that have compared electrical source localization (ESL) results obtained by analyzing ictal patterns in scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) with the brain areas that are found to be responsible for seizures using other brain imaging techniques. Additionally, adequate studies have not been performed to confirm the accuracy of ESL methods. Materials and Methods: In this study, ESL was conducted using LORETA (Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography) in 9 patients with lesions apparent on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and in 6 patients who did not exhibit lesions on their MRIs. EEGs of patients who underwent surgery for epilepsy and had follow-ups for at least 1 year after operations were analyzed for ictal spike, rhythmic, paroxysmal fast, and obscured EEG activities. Epileptogenic zones identified in postoperative MRIs were then compared with localizations obtained by LORETA model we employed. Results: We found that brain areas determined via ESL were in concordance with resected brain areas for 13 of the 15 patients evaluated, and those 13 patients were post-operatively determined as being seizure-free. Conclusion: ESL, which is a noninvasive technique, may contribute to the correct delineation of epileptogenic zones in patients who will eventually undergo surgery to treat epilepsy, (regardless of neuroimaging status). Moreover, ESL may aid in deciding on the number and localization of intracranial electrodes to be used in patients who are candidates for invasive recording.
topic Epilepsy
epileptogenic zone
LORETA
postoperative MRI
source localization
url http://www.annalsofian.org/article.asp?issn=0972-2327;year=2016;volume=19;issue=1;spage=37;epage=43;aulast=Akdeniz
work_keys_str_mv AT gulsumakdeniz electricalsourcelocalizationbyloretainpatientswithepilepsyconfirmationbypostoperativemri
_version_ 1716745064256897024