Comparison of Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Microcurrent Nerve Stimulation (MENS) in the Management of Masticatory Muscle Pain: A Comparative Study

Introduction. Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are a heterogeneous group of pathologies affecting the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), the jaw muscles, or both. Epidemiological studies of TMD reveal a prevalence of 82% in the general population with 48% of them presenting with clinical features of m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. Saranya, Junaid Ahmed, Nandita Shenoy, Ravikiran Ongole, Nanditha Sujir, Srikant Natarajan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:Pain Research and Management
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8291624
id doaj-d903b275ee6d4facb9d26485716ec026
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d903b275ee6d4facb9d26485716ec0262020-11-25T01:45:19ZengHindawi LimitedPain Research and Management1203-67651918-15232019-01-01201910.1155/2019/82916248291624Comparison of Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Microcurrent Nerve Stimulation (MENS) in the Management of Masticatory Muscle Pain: A Comparative StudyB. Saranya0Junaid Ahmed1Nandita Shenoy2Ravikiran Ongole3Nanditha Sujir4Srikant Natarajan5Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore 575001, IndiaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore 575001, IndiaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore 575001, IndiaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore 575001, IndiaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore 575001, IndiaManipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, IndiaIntroduction. Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are a heterogeneous group of pathologies affecting the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), the jaw muscles, or both. Epidemiological studies of TMD reveal a prevalence of 82% in the general population with 48% of them presenting with clinical features of muscle tenderness and difficulty in mouth opening. TMD are considered to be the most common orofacial pain conditions of nondental origin. Methods. The patients with TMD were randomly divided into two groups, A and B, based on their VAS scale. Group A consists of two subgroups 1 and 2 each consisting of 15 patients. Group B consists of two subgroups 3 and 4 consisting of 15 patients. Patients in Group A were given TENS for twenty minutes, and the frequency is adjusted as follows: (i) subgroup 1: TENS frequency at a range of 0–5 (VAS measuring 1–5) and (ii) subgroup 2: TENS frequency at a range of 5 and above (VAS measuring 6–10). Patients in Group B were given MENS for twenty minutes, and the frequency adjusted as follows: (i) subgroup 3: MENS frequency at range of 0–5 (VAS measuring 1–5) and (ii) subgroup 4: MENS frequency at a range of 5 and above (VAS measuring 6–10). Each patient was recalled for five consecutive days for the treatment, and the same intensity and frequency were maintained throughout the treatment period. Results. The improvement in VAS is seen to be highly significant statistically in MENS subgroup 4 (moderate-to-severe pain). Subgroups 1 and 3 had improvement in VAS which was comparable in both TENS and MENS groups. Conclusion. In the present study, it was found that TENS and MENS are equally effective in improving the functional mouth opening. MENS showed better and immediate effect in relief of pain. Microcurrent also has the advantage of being subthreshold, and hence the side effects such as tingling sensation and paresthesia seen to occur in some patients following TENS are absent. TENS and MENS can be considered as the first line of treatment in patients with acute and chronic masticatory muscle pain and also as an effective treatment option in cases of functional mouth opening.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8291624
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author B. Saranya
Junaid Ahmed
Nandita Shenoy
Ravikiran Ongole
Nanditha Sujir
Srikant Natarajan
spellingShingle B. Saranya
Junaid Ahmed
Nandita Shenoy
Ravikiran Ongole
Nanditha Sujir
Srikant Natarajan
Comparison of Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Microcurrent Nerve Stimulation (MENS) in the Management of Masticatory Muscle Pain: A Comparative Study
Pain Research and Management
author_facet B. Saranya
Junaid Ahmed
Nandita Shenoy
Ravikiran Ongole
Nanditha Sujir
Srikant Natarajan
author_sort B. Saranya
title Comparison of Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Microcurrent Nerve Stimulation (MENS) in the Management of Masticatory Muscle Pain: A Comparative Study
title_short Comparison of Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Microcurrent Nerve Stimulation (MENS) in the Management of Masticatory Muscle Pain: A Comparative Study
title_full Comparison of Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Microcurrent Nerve Stimulation (MENS) in the Management of Masticatory Muscle Pain: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Microcurrent Nerve Stimulation (MENS) in the Management of Masticatory Muscle Pain: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Microcurrent Nerve Stimulation (MENS) in the Management of Masticatory Muscle Pain: A Comparative Study
title_sort comparison of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (tens) and microcurrent nerve stimulation (mens) in the management of masticatory muscle pain: a comparative study
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Pain Research and Management
issn 1203-6765
1918-1523
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Introduction. Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are a heterogeneous group of pathologies affecting the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), the jaw muscles, or both. Epidemiological studies of TMD reveal a prevalence of 82% in the general population with 48% of them presenting with clinical features of muscle tenderness and difficulty in mouth opening. TMD are considered to be the most common orofacial pain conditions of nondental origin. Methods. The patients with TMD were randomly divided into two groups, A and B, based on their VAS scale. Group A consists of two subgroups 1 and 2 each consisting of 15 patients. Group B consists of two subgroups 3 and 4 consisting of 15 patients. Patients in Group A were given TENS for twenty minutes, and the frequency is adjusted as follows: (i) subgroup 1: TENS frequency at a range of 0–5 (VAS measuring 1–5) and (ii) subgroup 2: TENS frequency at a range of 5 and above (VAS measuring 6–10). Patients in Group B were given MENS for twenty minutes, and the frequency adjusted as follows: (i) subgroup 3: MENS frequency at range of 0–5 (VAS measuring 1–5) and (ii) subgroup 4: MENS frequency at a range of 5 and above (VAS measuring 6–10). Each patient was recalled for five consecutive days for the treatment, and the same intensity and frequency were maintained throughout the treatment period. Results. The improvement in VAS is seen to be highly significant statistically in MENS subgroup 4 (moderate-to-severe pain). Subgroups 1 and 3 had improvement in VAS which was comparable in both TENS and MENS groups. Conclusion. In the present study, it was found that TENS and MENS are equally effective in improving the functional mouth opening. MENS showed better and immediate effect in relief of pain. Microcurrent also has the advantage of being subthreshold, and hence the side effects such as tingling sensation and paresthesia seen to occur in some patients following TENS are absent. TENS and MENS can be considered as the first line of treatment in patients with acute and chronic masticatory muscle pain and also as an effective treatment option in cases of functional mouth opening.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8291624
work_keys_str_mv AT bsaranya comparisonoftranscutaneouselectricnervestimulationtensandmicrocurrentnervestimulationmensinthemanagementofmasticatorymusclepainacomparativestudy
AT junaidahmed comparisonoftranscutaneouselectricnervestimulationtensandmicrocurrentnervestimulationmensinthemanagementofmasticatorymusclepainacomparativestudy
AT nanditashenoy comparisonoftranscutaneouselectricnervestimulationtensandmicrocurrentnervestimulationmensinthemanagementofmasticatorymusclepainacomparativestudy
AT ravikiranongole comparisonoftranscutaneouselectricnervestimulationtensandmicrocurrentnervestimulationmensinthemanagementofmasticatorymusclepainacomparativestudy
AT nandithasujir comparisonoftranscutaneouselectricnervestimulationtensandmicrocurrentnervestimulationmensinthemanagementofmasticatorymusclepainacomparativestudy
AT srikantnatarajan comparisonoftranscutaneouselectricnervestimulationtensandmicrocurrentnervestimulationmensinthemanagementofmasticatorymusclepainacomparativestudy
_version_ 1725023664240328704