Functionality of intergenic transcription: an evolutionary comparison.

Although a large proportion of human transcription occurs outside the boundaries of known genes, the functional significance of this transcription remains unknown. We have compared the expression patterns of known genes as well as intergenic transcripts within the ENCODE regions between humans and c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Philipp Khaitovich, Janet Kelso, Henriette Franz, Johann Visagie, Thomas Giger, Sabrina Joerchel, Ekkehard Petzold, Richard E Green, Michael Lachmann, Svante Pääbo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2006-10-01
Series:PLoS Genetics
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1599769?pdf=render
id doaj-d91b23e2d65a4b279b1a7179a325afb9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d91b23e2d65a4b279b1a7179a325afb92020-11-24T21:42:02ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Genetics1553-73901553-74042006-10-01210e17110.1371/journal.pgen.0020171Functionality of intergenic transcription: an evolutionary comparison.Philipp KhaitovichJanet KelsoHenriette FranzJohann VisagieThomas GigerSabrina JoerchelEkkehard PetzoldRichard E GreenMichael LachmannSvante PääboAlthough a large proportion of human transcription occurs outside the boundaries of known genes, the functional significance of this transcription remains unknown. We have compared the expression patterns of known genes as well as intergenic transcripts within the ENCODE regions between humans and chimpanzees in brain, heart, testis, and lymphoblastoid cell lines. We find that intergenic transcripts show patterns of tissue-specific conservation of their expression, which are comparable to exonic transcripts of known genes. This suggests that intergenic transcripts are subject to functional constraints that restrict their rate of evolutionary change as well as putative positive selection to an extent comparable to that of classical protein-coding genes. In brain and testis, we find that part of this intergenic transcription is caused by widespread use of alternative promoters. Further, we find that about half of the expression differences between humans and chimpanzees are due to intergenic transcripts.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1599769?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Philipp Khaitovich
Janet Kelso
Henriette Franz
Johann Visagie
Thomas Giger
Sabrina Joerchel
Ekkehard Petzold
Richard E Green
Michael Lachmann
Svante Pääbo
spellingShingle Philipp Khaitovich
Janet Kelso
Henriette Franz
Johann Visagie
Thomas Giger
Sabrina Joerchel
Ekkehard Petzold
Richard E Green
Michael Lachmann
Svante Pääbo
Functionality of intergenic transcription: an evolutionary comparison.
PLoS Genetics
author_facet Philipp Khaitovich
Janet Kelso
Henriette Franz
Johann Visagie
Thomas Giger
Sabrina Joerchel
Ekkehard Petzold
Richard E Green
Michael Lachmann
Svante Pääbo
author_sort Philipp Khaitovich
title Functionality of intergenic transcription: an evolutionary comparison.
title_short Functionality of intergenic transcription: an evolutionary comparison.
title_full Functionality of intergenic transcription: an evolutionary comparison.
title_fullStr Functionality of intergenic transcription: an evolutionary comparison.
title_full_unstemmed Functionality of intergenic transcription: an evolutionary comparison.
title_sort functionality of intergenic transcription: an evolutionary comparison.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Genetics
issn 1553-7390
1553-7404
publishDate 2006-10-01
description Although a large proportion of human transcription occurs outside the boundaries of known genes, the functional significance of this transcription remains unknown. We have compared the expression patterns of known genes as well as intergenic transcripts within the ENCODE regions between humans and chimpanzees in brain, heart, testis, and lymphoblastoid cell lines. We find that intergenic transcripts show patterns of tissue-specific conservation of their expression, which are comparable to exonic transcripts of known genes. This suggests that intergenic transcripts are subject to functional constraints that restrict their rate of evolutionary change as well as putative positive selection to an extent comparable to that of classical protein-coding genes. In brain and testis, we find that part of this intergenic transcription is caused by widespread use of alternative promoters. Further, we find that about half of the expression differences between humans and chimpanzees are due to intergenic transcripts.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1599769?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT philippkhaitovich functionalityofintergenictranscriptionanevolutionarycomparison
AT janetkelso functionalityofintergenictranscriptionanevolutionarycomparison
AT henriettefranz functionalityofintergenictranscriptionanevolutionarycomparison
AT johannvisagie functionalityofintergenictranscriptionanevolutionarycomparison
AT thomasgiger functionalityofintergenictranscriptionanevolutionarycomparison
AT sabrinajoerchel functionalityofintergenictranscriptionanevolutionarycomparison
AT ekkehardpetzold functionalityofintergenictranscriptionanevolutionarycomparison
AT richardegreen functionalityofintergenictranscriptionanevolutionarycomparison
AT michaellachmann functionalityofintergenictranscriptionanevolutionarycomparison
AT svantepaabo functionalityofintergenictranscriptionanevolutionarycomparison
_version_ 1725919316442873856