Capturing Expert Knowledge of Mushrooms
We examined how mushroom experts organize and process their knowledge, compared with novices, and which types of arguments they use to process information. Mushroom experts and novices carried out an identification/memorization task, a free recall task, and a matching task. Results showed that exper...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2019-05-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019852484 |
id |
doaj-d938593a080244c59b84d8d2b20043d5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d938593a080244c59b84d8d2b20043d52020-11-25T03:19:22ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402019-05-01910.1177/2158244019852484Capturing Expert Knowledge of MushroomsOlga Megalakaki0Audrey Crimet1Ugo Ballenghein2Yannick Gounden3CRP-CPO EA 7273, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, FranceCRP-CPO EA 7273, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, FranceCHART, Université Paris 8, FranceCRP-CPO EA 7273, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, FranceWe examined how mushroom experts organize and process their knowledge, compared with novices, and which types of arguments they use to process information. Mushroom experts and novices carried out an identification/memorization task, a free recall task, and a matching task. Results showed that experts performed better than novices on all three tasks. In the identification task, they named items at the subordinate level, whereas novices named them at the basic level. In the free recall task, experts recalled more items than novices, by grouping them into categories, while in the matching task, they used both similarity and dissimilarity criteria and provided conceptual and perceptual arguments. In conclusion, experts seem capable of carrying out two types of processing: relational processing, reflecting the ability to form categories at the basic level by considering the similarities of items belonging to the same category, and more analytical processing at the subordinate level, reflecting the ability to process difference in a context of similarity, indicating that experts are also able to use specific (distinctive) attributes, relying simultaneously on perceptual and conceptual information.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019852484 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Olga Megalakaki Audrey Crimet Ugo Ballenghein Yannick Gounden |
spellingShingle |
Olga Megalakaki Audrey Crimet Ugo Ballenghein Yannick Gounden Capturing Expert Knowledge of Mushrooms SAGE Open |
author_facet |
Olga Megalakaki Audrey Crimet Ugo Ballenghein Yannick Gounden |
author_sort |
Olga Megalakaki |
title |
Capturing Expert Knowledge of Mushrooms |
title_short |
Capturing Expert Knowledge of Mushrooms |
title_full |
Capturing Expert Knowledge of Mushrooms |
title_fullStr |
Capturing Expert Knowledge of Mushrooms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Capturing Expert Knowledge of Mushrooms |
title_sort |
capturing expert knowledge of mushrooms |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
SAGE Open |
issn |
2158-2440 |
publishDate |
2019-05-01 |
description |
We examined how mushroom experts organize and process their knowledge, compared with novices, and which types of arguments they use to process information. Mushroom experts and novices carried out an identification/memorization task, a free recall task, and a matching task. Results showed that experts performed better than novices on all three tasks. In the identification task, they named items at the subordinate level, whereas novices named them at the basic level. In the free recall task, experts recalled more items than novices, by grouping them into categories, while in the matching task, they used both similarity and dissimilarity criteria and provided conceptual and perceptual arguments. In conclusion, experts seem capable of carrying out two types of processing: relational processing, reflecting the ability to form categories at the basic level by considering the similarities of items belonging to the same category, and more analytical processing at the subordinate level, reflecting the ability to process difference in a context of similarity, indicating that experts are also able to use specific (distinctive) attributes, relying simultaneously on perceptual and conceptual information. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019852484 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT olgamegalakaki capturingexpertknowledgeofmushrooms AT audreycrimet capturingexpertknowledgeofmushrooms AT ugoballenghein capturingexpertknowledgeofmushrooms AT yannickgounden capturingexpertknowledgeofmushrooms |
_version_ |
1724622816097075200 |