Capturing Expert Knowledge of Mushrooms

We examined how mushroom experts organize and process their knowledge, compared with novices, and which types of arguments they use to process information. Mushroom experts and novices carried out an identification/memorization task, a free recall task, and a matching task. Results showed that exper...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olga Megalakaki, Audrey Crimet, Ugo Ballenghein, Yannick Gounden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-05-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019852484
id doaj-d938593a080244c59b84d8d2b20043d5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d938593a080244c59b84d8d2b20043d52020-11-25T03:19:22ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402019-05-01910.1177/2158244019852484Capturing Expert Knowledge of MushroomsOlga Megalakaki0Audrey Crimet1Ugo Ballenghein2Yannick Gounden3CRP-CPO EA 7273, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, FranceCRP-CPO EA 7273, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, FranceCHART, Université Paris 8, FranceCRP-CPO EA 7273, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, FranceWe examined how mushroom experts organize and process their knowledge, compared with novices, and which types of arguments they use to process information. Mushroom experts and novices carried out an identification/memorization task, a free recall task, and a matching task. Results showed that experts performed better than novices on all three tasks. In the identification task, they named items at the subordinate level, whereas novices named them at the basic level. In the free recall task, experts recalled more items than novices, by grouping them into categories, while in the matching task, they used both similarity and dissimilarity criteria and provided conceptual and perceptual arguments. In conclusion, experts seem capable of carrying out two types of processing: relational processing, reflecting the ability to form categories at the basic level by considering the similarities of items belonging to the same category, and more analytical processing at the subordinate level, reflecting the ability to process difference in a context of similarity, indicating that experts are also able to use specific (distinctive) attributes, relying simultaneously on perceptual and conceptual information.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019852484
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olga Megalakaki
Audrey Crimet
Ugo Ballenghein
Yannick Gounden
spellingShingle Olga Megalakaki
Audrey Crimet
Ugo Ballenghein
Yannick Gounden
Capturing Expert Knowledge of Mushrooms
SAGE Open
author_facet Olga Megalakaki
Audrey Crimet
Ugo Ballenghein
Yannick Gounden
author_sort Olga Megalakaki
title Capturing Expert Knowledge of Mushrooms
title_short Capturing Expert Knowledge of Mushrooms
title_full Capturing Expert Knowledge of Mushrooms
title_fullStr Capturing Expert Knowledge of Mushrooms
title_full_unstemmed Capturing Expert Knowledge of Mushrooms
title_sort capturing expert knowledge of mushrooms
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2019-05-01
description We examined how mushroom experts organize and process their knowledge, compared with novices, and which types of arguments they use to process information. Mushroom experts and novices carried out an identification/memorization task, a free recall task, and a matching task. Results showed that experts performed better than novices on all three tasks. In the identification task, they named items at the subordinate level, whereas novices named them at the basic level. In the free recall task, experts recalled more items than novices, by grouping them into categories, while in the matching task, they used both similarity and dissimilarity criteria and provided conceptual and perceptual arguments. In conclusion, experts seem capable of carrying out two types of processing: relational processing, reflecting the ability to form categories at the basic level by considering the similarities of items belonging to the same category, and more analytical processing at the subordinate level, reflecting the ability to process difference in a context of similarity, indicating that experts are also able to use specific (distinctive) attributes, relying simultaneously on perceptual and conceptual information.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019852484
work_keys_str_mv AT olgamegalakaki capturingexpertknowledgeofmushrooms
AT audreycrimet capturingexpertknowledgeofmushrooms
AT ugoballenghein capturingexpertknowledgeofmushrooms
AT yannickgounden capturingexpertknowledgeofmushrooms
_version_ 1724622816097075200