Establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the FEVER trial): a mixed methods study

Objective To explore parent and staff views on the acceptability of a randomised controlled trial investigating temperature thresholds for antipyretic intervention in critically ill children with fever and infection (the FEVER trial) during a multi-phase pilot study.Design Mixed methods study with d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark J Peters, Padmanabhan Ramnarayan, Lyvonne N Tume, Elizabeth Deja, Imran Khan, Jason Watkins, Rachel Agbeko, Paul R Mouncey, Blaise Fenn, Kentigern Thorburn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/3/e041952.full
id doaj-d94fd2d1c340455b9816cdc7d97c8bd7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d94fd2d1c340455b9816cdc7d97c8bd72021-07-02T13:03:59ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-03-0111310.1136/bmjopen-2020-041952Establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the FEVER trial): a mixed methods studyMark J Peters0Padmanabhan Ramnarayan1Lyvonne N Tume2Elizabeth Deja3Imran Khan4Jason Watkins5Rachel Agbeko6Paul R Mouncey7Blaise Fenn8Kentigern Thorburn9Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UKChildren's Acute Transport Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UKSchool of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UKPublic Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UKInstitute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UKPatient partner, London, UKPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UKClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UKPatient partner, London, UKPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UKObjective To explore parent and staff views on the acceptability of a randomised controlled trial investigating temperature thresholds for antipyretic intervention in critically ill children with fever and infection (the FEVER trial) during a multi-phase pilot study.Design Mixed methods study with data collected at three time points: (1) before, (2) during and (3) after a pilot trial.Setting English, Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs).Participants (1) Pre-pilot trial focus groups with pilot site staff (n=56) and interviews with parents (n=25) whose child had been admitted to PICU in the last 3 years with a fever and suspected infection, (2) Questionnaires with parents of randomised children following pilot trial recruitment (n=48 from 47 families) and (3) post-pilot trial interviews with parents (n=19), focus groups (n=50) and a survey (n=48) with site staff. Analysis drew on Sekhon et al’s theoretical framework of acceptability.Results There was initial support for the trial, yet some held concerns regarding the proposed temperature thresholds and not using paracetamol for pain or discomfort. Pre-trial findings informed protocol changes and training, which influenced views on trial acceptability. Staff trained by the FEVER team found the trial more acceptable than those trained by colleagues. Parents and staff found the trial acceptable. Some concerns about pain or discomfort during weaning from ventilation remained.Conclusions Pre-trial findings and pilot trial experience influenced acceptability, providing insight into how challenges may be overcome. We present an adapted theoretical framework of acceptability to inform future trial feasibility studies.Trial registration numbers ISRCTN16022198 and NCT03028818.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/3/e041952.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mark J Peters
Padmanabhan Ramnarayan
Lyvonne N Tume
Elizabeth Deja
Imran Khan
Jason Watkins
Rachel Agbeko
Paul R Mouncey
Blaise Fenn
Kentigern Thorburn
spellingShingle Mark J Peters
Padmanabhan Ramnarayan
Lyvonne N Tume
Elizabeth Deja
Imran Khan
Jason Watkins
Rachel Agbeko
Paul R Mouncey
Blaise Fenn
Kentigern Thorburn
Establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the FEVER trial): a mixed methods study
BMJ Open
author_facet Mark J Peters
Padmanabhan Ramnarayan
Lyvonne N Tume
Elizabeth Deja
Imran Khan
Jason Watkins
Rachel Agbeko
Paul R Mouncey
Blaise Fenn
Kentigern Thorburn
author_sort Mark J Peters
title Establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the FEVER trial): a mixed methods study
title_short Establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the FEVER trial): a mixed methods study
title_full Establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the FEVER trial): a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the FEVER trial): a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the FEVER trial): a mixed methods study
title_sort establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the fever trial): a mixed methods study
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Objective To explore parent and staff views on the acceptability of a randomised controlled trial investigating temperature thresholds for antipyretic intervention in critically ill children with fever and infection (the FEVER trial) during a multi-phase pilot study.Design Mixed methods study with data collected at three time points: (1) before, (2) during and (3) after a pilot trial.Setting English, Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs).Participants (1) Pre-pilot trial focus groups with pilot site staff (n=56) and interviews with parents (n=25) whose child had been admitted to PICU in the last 3 years with a fever and suspected infection, (2) Questionnaires with parents of randomised children following pilot trial recruitment (n=48 from 47 families) and (3) post-pilot trial interviews with parents (n=19), focus groups (n=50) and a survey (n=48) with site staff. Analysis drew on Sekhon et al’s theoretical framework of acceptability.Results There was initial support for the trial, yet some held concerns regarding the proposed temperature thresholds and not using paracetamol for pain or discomfort. Pre-trial findings informed protocol changes and training, which influenced views on trial acceptability. Staff trained by the FEVER team found the trial more acceptable than those trained by colleagues. Parents and staff found the trial acceptable. Some concerns about pain or discomfort during weaning from ventilation remained.Conclusions Pre-trial findings and pilot trial experience influenced acceptability, providing insight into how challenges may be overcome. We present an adapted theoretical framework of acceptability to inform future trial feasibility studies.Trial registration numbers ISRCTN16022198 and NCT03028818.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/3/e041952.full
work_keys_str_mv AT markjpeters establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy
AT padmanabhanramnarayan establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy
AT lyvonnentume establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy
AT elizabethdeja establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy
AT imrankhan establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy
AT jasonwatkins establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy
AT rachelagbeko establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy
AT paulrmouncey establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy
AT blaisefenn establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy
AT kentigernthorburn establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy
_version_ 1721329381473779712