Establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the FEVER trial): a mixed methods study
Objective To explore parent and staff views on the acceptability of a randomised controlled trial investigating temperature thresholds for antipyretic intervention in critically ill children with fever and infection (the FEVER trial) during a multi-phase pilot study.Design Mixed methods study with d...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021-03-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/3/e041952.full |
id |
doaj-d94fd2d1c340455b9816cdc7d97c8bd7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d94fd2d1c340455b9816cdc7d97c8bd72021-07-02T13:03:59ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-03-0111310.1136/bmjopen-2020-041952Establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the FEVER trial): a mixed methods studyMark J Peters0Padmanabhan Ramnarayan1Lyvonne N Tume2Elizabeth Deja3Imran Khan4Jason Watkins5Rachel Agbeko6Paul R Mouncey7Blaise Fenn8Kentigern Thorburn9Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UKChildren's Acute Transport Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UKSchool of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UKPublic Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UKInstitute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UKPatient partner, London, UKPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UKClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UKPatient partner, London, UKPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UKObjective To explore parent and staff views on the acceptability of a randomised controlled trial investigating temperature thresholds for antipyretic intervention in critically ill children with fever and infection (the FEVER trial) during a multi-phase pilot study.Design Mixed methods study with data collected at three time points: (1) before, (2) during and (3) after a pilot trial.Setting English, Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs).Participants (1) Pre-pilot trial focus groups with pilot site staff (n=56) and interviews with parents (n=25) whose child had been admitted to PICU in the last 3 years with a fever and suspected infection, (2) Questionnaires with parents of randomised children following pilot trial recruitment (n=48 from 47 families) and (3) post-pilot trial interviews with parents (n=19), focus groups (n=50) and a survey (n=48) with site staff. Analysis drew on Sekhon et al’s theoretical framework of acceptability.Results There was initial support for the trial, yet some held concerns regarding the proposed temperature thresholds and not using paracetamol for pain or discomfort. Pre-trial findings informed protocol changes and training, which influenced views on trial acceptability. Staff trained by the FEVER team found the trial more acceptable than those trained by colleagues. Parents and staff found the trial acceptable. Some concerns about pain or discomfort during weaning from ventilation remained.Conclusions Pre-trial findings and pilot trial experience influenced acceptability, providing insight into how challenges may be overcome. We present an adapted theoretical framework of acceptability to inform future trial feasibility studies.Trial registration numbers ISRCTN16022198 and NCT03028818.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/3/e041952.full |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mark J Peters Padmanabhan Ramnarayan Lyvonne N Tume Elizabeth Deja Imran Khan Jason Watkins Rachel Agbeko Paul R Mouncey Blaise Fenn Kentigern Thorburn |
spellingShingle |
Mark J Peters Padmanabhan Ramnarayan Lyvonne N Tume Elizabeth Deja Imran Khan Jason Watkins Rachel Agbeko Paul R Mouncey Blaise Fenn Kentigern Thorburn Establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the FEVER trial): a mixed methods study BMJ Open |
author_facet |
Mark J Peters Padmanabhan Ramnarayan Lyvonne N Tume Elizabeth Deja Imran Khan Jason Watkins Rachel Agbeko Paul R Mouncey Blaise Fenn Kentigern Thorburn |
author_sort |
Mark J Peters |
title |
Establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the FEVER trial): a mixed methods study |
title_short |
Establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the FEVER trial): a mixed methods study |
title_full |
Establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the FEVER trial): a mixed methods study |
title_fullStr |
Establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the FEVER trial): a mixed methods study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the FEVER trial): a mixed methods study |
title_sort |
establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the fever trial): a mixed methods study |
publisher |
BMJ Publishing Group |
series |
BMJ Open |
issn |
2044-6055 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Objective To explore parent and staff views on the acceptability of a randomised controlled trial investigating temperature thresholds for antipyretic intervention in critically ill children with fever and infection (the FEVER trial) during a multi-phase pilot study.Design Mixed methods study with data collected at three time points: (1) before, (2) during and (3) after a pilot trial.Setting English, Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs).Participants (1) Pre-pilot trial focus groups with pilot site staff (n=56) and interviews with parents (n=25) whose child had been admitted to PICU in the last 3 years with a fever and suspected infection, (2) Questionnaires with parents of randomised children following pilot trial recruitment (n=48 from 47 families) and (3) post-pilot trial interviews with parents (n=19), focus groups (n=50) and a survey (n=48) with site staff. Analysis drew on Sekhon et al’s theoretical framework of acceptability.Results There was initial support for the trial, yet some held concerns regarding the proposed temperature thresholds and not using paracetamol for pain or discomfort. Pre-trial findings informed protocol changes and training, which influenced views on trial acceptability. Staff trained by the FEVER team found the trial more acceptable than those trained by colleagues. Parents and staff found the trial acceptable. Some concerns about pain or discomfort during weaning from ventilation remained.Conclusions Pre-trial findings and pilot trial experience influenced acceptability, providing insight into how challenges may be overcome. We present an adapted theoretical framework of acceptability to inform future trial feasibility studies.Trial registration numbers ISRCTN16022198 and NCT03028818. |
url |
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/3/e041952.full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT markjpeters establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy AT padmanabhanramnarayan establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy AT lyvonnentume establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy AT elizabethdeja establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy AT imrankhan establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy AT jasonwatkins establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy AT rachelagbeko establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy AT paulrmouncey establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy AT blaisefenn establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy AT kentigernthorburn establishingandaugmentingviewsontheacceptabilityofapaediatriccriticalcarerandomisedcontrolledtrialthefevertrialamixedmethodsstudy |
_version_ |
1721329381473779712 |