Anterior prominence of the femoral condyle varies among prosthesis designs and surgical techniques in total knee arthroplasty

• Main Authors: Junya Itou, Umito Kuwashima, Masafumi Itoh, Ken Okazaki
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2021-09-01
• Series: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
• Subjects: Total knee arthroplasty; Computer simulation; Patellofemoral overstuffing; Anterior reference; Posterior reference
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04670-2

Abstract Background Patellofemoral overstuffing after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can cause limited range of motion and anterior knee pain. This study compared anterior prominence of femoral components among different prothesis designs in surgical simulation models utilizing the anterior reference (AR) and posterior reference (PR) techniques. Methods Surgical simulations were performed using on a three-dimensional planning system preoperative computed tomography data of consecutive 30 patients with knee osteoarthritis scheduled to undergo TKA. Four implant models were used: Attune, Persona, Journey II, and Legion. Rotational alignment was set parallel to the transepicondylar axis and size was selected based on the absence of notch formation in the femoral anterior cortex and the best fit with the shape of the medial posterior femoral condyle. For each combination of surgical technique (AR or PR method) and implant model, measurements were taken of the maximum medial, central, and lateral prominence of the implant from the anterior femoral cortex. Results Using either the AR or PR method, the medial and central prominences were significantly lower with Journey II than with the other models. The lateral prominence was the lowest with Attune in the AR method. The AR method was associated with significantly less prominence compared with the PR method, regardless of implant model. Conclusions The degree of anterior prominence of the femoral implant is affected by the implant design when the AR method is used. The PR method is associated with greater anterior prominence compared with the AR method, and the pitch size is an additional factor in the PR method. Surgeons should be familiar with implant designs, including the thickness of the anterior flange and the available size selections.