Efficacy of industrial-grade infrared noncontact temperature recording device for fever screening during coronavirus pandemic

Background: The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 “a pandemic” on March 11, 2020. An essential preventive and screening strategy adopted was temperature screening at various public places such as airports and hospitals with devices like handheld, noncontact infrared thermometers. Before th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaminder Bir Kaur, Anuj Singhal, Arun Kumar Yadav, Vishal Mangal, Rohit Jain, Satish Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cjhr.org/article.asp?issn=2348-3334;year=2020;volume=7;issue=4;spage=256;epage=260;aulast=Kaur
id doaj-d98698e8fb8146ef88f9ea6f639eb68c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d98698e8fb8146ef88f9ea6f639eb68c2021-04-20T08:43:07ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsCHRISMED Journal of Health and Research2348-33342348-506X2020-01-017425626010.4103/cjhr.cjhr_50_20Efficacy of industrial-grade infrared noncontact temperature recording device for fever screening during coronavirus pandemicKaminder Bir KaurAnuj SinghalArun Kumar YadavVishal MangalRohit JainSatish KumarBackground: The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 “a pandemic” on March 11, 2020. An essential preventive and screening strategy adopted was temperature screening at various public places such as airports and hospitals with devices like handheld, noncontact infrared thermometers. Before this pandemic, the industrial thermometers have never been used in health-care settings. The study was conducted to compare temperature readings of these industrial-grade infrared noncontact handheld thermometers with a digital thermometer. Materials and Methods: Three Testo® industrial-grade infrared noncontact thermometer (IGNCT) and Dr. Trust digital thermometer were used on 117 individuals for recording temperature. The average of three readings was taken for each instrument by a single investigator. Results: Out of 117 individuals, 14 (11.9%) were febrile. The Pearson correlation values between the digital thermometers varied from 0.3 to 0.42. The reliability, as measured by the intraclass correlation, was poor (0.16-“0.4). The area under the curve for IGNCT devices varied from 76% to 84%. Conclusion: Industrial-grade infrared noncontact temperature (IGNCT) recording devices with its no-touch technique to measure temperature while maintaining distance may be useful in a pandemic situation. However, the higher the area under the curve, the better it is. In a large cohort, 20% will be misclassified, and in absolute terms, they may be translated into large numbers. Hence, there is a case for better devices having an area under the curve of nearly 100% for the screening of population. The role of IGNCT devices for the screening of individuals to identify cases of febrile illness is limited owing to its poor reliability and unacceptable area under the curve for screening large populations.http://www.cjhr.org/article.asp?issn=2348-3334;year=2020;volume=7;issue=4;spage=256;epage=260;aulast=Kaurcovid-19industrial-gradeinfrarednoncontact thermometerscreeningtemperature
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kaminder Bir Kaur
Anuj Singhal
Arun Kumar Yadav
Vishal Mangal
Rohit Jain
Satish Kumar
spellingShingle Kaminder Bir Kaur
Anuj Singhal
Arun Kumar Yadav
Vishal Mangal
Rohit Jain
Satish Kumar
Efficacy of industrial-grade infrared noncontact temperature recording device for fever screening during coronavirus pandemic
CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research
covid-19
industrial-grade
infrared
noncontact thermometer
screening
temperature
author_facet Kaminder Bir Kaur
Anuj Singhal
Arun Kumar Yadav
Vishal Mangal
Rohit Jain
Satish Kumar
author_sort Kaminder Bir Kaur
title Efficacy of industrial-grade infrared noncontact temperature recording device for fever screening during coronavirus pandemic
title_short Efficacy of industrial-grade infrared noncontact temperature recording device for fever screening during coronavirus pandemic
title_full Efficacy of industrial-grade infrared noncontact temperature recording device for fever screening during coronavirus pandemic
title_fullStr Efficacy of industrial-grade infrared noncontact temperature recording device for fever screening during coronavirus pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of industrial-grade infrared noncontact temperature recording device for fever screening during coronavirus pandemic
title_sort efficacy of industrial-grade infrared noncontact temperature recording device for fever screening during coronavirus pandemic
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research
issn 2348-3334
2348-506X
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Background: The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 “a pandemic” on March 11, 2020. An essential preventive and screening strategy adopted was temperature screening at various public places such as airports and hospitals with devices like handheld, noncontact infrared thermometers. Before this pandemic, the industrial thermometers have never been used in health-care settings. The study was conducted to compare temperature readings of these industrial-grade infrared noncontact handheld thermometers with a digital thermometer. Materials and Methods: Three Testo® industrial-grade infrared noncontact thermometer (IGNCT) and Dr. Trust digital thermometer were used on 117 individuals for recording temperature. The average of three readings was taken for each instrument by a single investigator. Results: Out of 117 individuals, 14 (11.9%) were febrile. The Pearson correlation values between the digital thermometers varied from 0.3 to 0.42. The reliability, as measured by the intraclass correlation, was poor (0.16-“0.4). The area under the curve for IGNCT devices varied from 76% to 84%. Conclusion: Industrial-grade infrared noncontact temperature (IGNCT) recording devices with its no-touch technique to measure temperature while maintaining distance may be useful in a pandemic situation. However, the higher the area under the curve, the better it is. In a large cohort, 20% will be misclassified, and in absolute terms, they may be translated into large numbers. Hence, there is a case for better devices having an area under the curve of nearly 100% for the screening of population. The role of IGNCT devices for the screening of individuals to identify cases of febrile illness is limited owing to its poor reliability and unacceptable area under the curve for screening large populations.
topic covid-19
industrial-grade
infrared
noncontact thermometer
screening
temperature
url http://www.cjhr.org/article.asp?issn=2348-3334;year=2020;volume=7;issue=4;spage=256;epage=260;aulast=Kaur
work_keys_str_mv AT kaminderbirkaur efficacyofindustrialgradeinfrarednoncontacttemperaturerecordingdeviceforfeverscreeningduringcoronaviruspandemic
AT anujsinghal efficacyofindustrialgradeinfrarednoncontacttemperaturerecordingdeviceforfeverscreeningduringcoronaviruspandemic
AT arunkumaryadav efficacyofindustrialgradeinfrarednoncontacttemperaturerecordingdeviceforfeverscreeningduringcoronaviruspandemic
AT vishalmangal efficacyofindustrialgradeinfrarednoncontacttemperaturerecordingdeviceforfeverscreeningduringcoronaviruspandemic
AT rohitjain efficacyofindustrialgradeinfrarednoncontacttemperaturerecordingdeviceforfeverscreeningduringcoronaviruspandemic
AT satishkumar efficacyofindustrialgradeinfrarednoncontacttemperaturerecordingdeviceforfeverscreeningduringcoronaviruspandemic
_version_ 1721518228489895936