Not all numbers are equal: preferences and biases among children and adults when generating random sequences.

We investigate the number preferences of children and adults when generating random digit sequences. Previous research has shown convincingly that adults prefer smaller numbers when randomly choosing between responses 1-6. We analyse randomisation choices made by both children and adults, considerin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John Nicholas Towse, Tobias eLoetscher, Peter eBrugger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00019/full
id doaj-d9aa2984f5a74ab8a9f0faeec44f36c6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d9aa2984f5a74ab8a9f0faeec44f36c62020-11-24T22:08:01ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-01-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.0001967792Not all numbers are equal: preferences and biases among children and adults when generating random sequences.John Nicholas Towse0Tobias eLoetscher1Peter eBrugger2Lancaster UniversityFlinders UniversityUniversity Hospital ZurichWe investigate the number preferences of children and adults when generating random digit sequences. Previous research has shown convincingly that adults prefer smaller numbers when randomly choosing between responses 1-6. We analyse randomisation choices made by both children and adults, considering a range of experimental studies and task configurations. Children – most of whom are between 8 and 11 years- show a preference for relatively large numbers when choosing numbers 1-10. Adults show a preference for small numbers with the same response set. We report a modest association between children’s age and numerical bias. However, children also exhibit a small number bias with a smaller response set available, and they show a preference specifically for the numbers 1-3 across many datasets. We argue that number space demonstrates both continuities (numbers 1-3 have a distinct status) and change (a developmentally emerging bias towards the left side of representational space or lower numbers).http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00019/fullspatial cognitioncognitive developmentNumerical cognitionrandom generationnumber preferences
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John Nicholas Towse
Tobias eLoetscher
Peter eBrugger
spellingShingle John Nicholas Towse
Tobias eLoetscher
Peter eBrugger
Not all numbers are equal: preferences and biases among children and adults when generating random sequences.
Frontiers in Psychology
spatial cognition
cognitive development
Numerical cognition
random generation
number preferences
author_facet John Nicholas Towse
Tobias eLoetscher
Peter eBrugger
author_sort John Nicholas Towse
title Not all numbers are equal: preferences and biases among children and adults when generating random sequences.
title_short Not all numbers are equal: preferences and biases among children and adults when generating random sequences.
title_full Not all numbers are equal: preferences and biases among children and adults when generating random sequences.
title_fullStr Not all numbers are equal: preferences and biases among children and adults when generating random sequences.
title_full_unstemmed Not all numbers are equal: preferences and biases among children and adults when generating random sequences.
title_sort not all numbers are equal: preferences and biases among children and adults when generating random sequences.
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2014-01-01
description We investigate the number preferences of children and adults when generating random digit sequences. Previous research has shown convincingly that adults prefer smaller numbers when randomly choosing between responses 1-6. We analyse randomisation choices made by both children and adults, considering a range of experimental studies and task configurations. Children – most of whom are between 8 and 11 years- show a preference for relatively large numbers when choosing numbers 1-10. Adults show a preference for small numbers with the same response set. We report a modest association between children’s age and numerical bias. However, children also exhibit a small number bias with a smaller response set available, and they show a preference specifically for the numbers 1-3 across many datasets. We argue that number space demonstrates both continuities (numbers 1-3 have a distinct status) and change (a developmentally emerging bias towards the left side of representational space or lower numbers).
topic spatial cognition
cognitive development
Numerical cognition
random generation
number preferences
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00019/full
work_keys_str_mv AT johnnicholastowse notallnumbersareequalpreferencesandbiasesamongchildrenandadultswhengeneratingrandomsequences
AT tobiaseloetscher notallnumbersareequalpreferencesandbiasesamongchildrenandadultswhengeneratingrandomsequences
AT peterebrugger notallnumbersareequalpreferencesandbiasesamongchildrenandadultswhengeneratingrandomsequences
_version_ 1725817970134876160