Open versus minimally invasive TLIF: literature review and meta-analysis
Abstract Study design This study is a comparative, literature review. Objective The aim of this study is to provide a comparative analysis of open vs. minimally invasive TLIF using a literature review and a meta-analysis. Summary of background data Lumbar interbody fusion is a well-established surgi...
Main Authors: | Ahmed Hammad, André Wirries, Ardavan Ardeshiri, Olexandr Nikiforov, Florian Geiger |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-019-1266-y |
Similar Items
-
A comparative prospective study of clinical and radiological outcomes between open and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
by: Sai Gautham Balasubramanian, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Comparison of MRI Visualization Following Minimally Invasive and Open TLIF: A Retrospective Single-Center Study
by: Vadim A. Byvaltsev, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
A systematic literature review of time to return to work and narcotic use after lumbar spinal fusion using minimal invasive and open surgery techniques
by: Xuan Wang, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01) -
Open and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Intermediate Results and Complications
by: Hwee Weng Dennis Hey, et al.
Published: (2015-04-01) -
Mast Quadrant-assisted Minimally Invasive Modified Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Single Incision Versus Double Incision
by: Xin-Lei Xia, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)