Comparison of Aquinas’ and Mulla Sadra's Viewpoints about the Occurrence or Eternity of the World
This paper investigates the attitudes of two Islamic and Christian thinkers, Saint Aquinas and Mulla Sadra Shirazi, about occurrence and eternity hypothesis issue.Aquinas faces two ideas. The first approach is eternity of the world based on Aristotle's theory and his followers; another approach...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
University of Isfahan
2010-01-01
|
| Series: | Metaphysik |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://uijs.ui.ac.ir/mph/browse.php?a_id=117&sid=1&slc_lang=en |
| Summary: | This paper investigates the attitudes of two Islamic and Christian thinkers, Saint Aquinas and Mulla Sadra Shirazi, about occurrence and eternity hypothesis issue.Aquinas faces two ideas. The first approach is eternity of the world based on Aristotle's theory and his followers; another approach is the world temporal occurrence derived from Christian scriptures. Aquinas believes that the reasons presented for proving the world's occurrence are not convincing and therefore criticizes them. Although he accepts the universe occurrence he has a worshiping view to it and finally regards the world's eternity and occurrence as an antinomical problem.In contrast, Mulla Sadra who has accepted the occurrence does not consider a starting point for the issue and in turn tries to prove it by Substantial Motion approach and therefore regardless of worship aspect of the issue and by employing a rational approach he gains a higher status than Aquinas. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2008-8086 |