Clinicopathologic factors that influence prognosis and survival outcomes in men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with Radium‐223

Abstract Background In men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with primarily bone metastases, radium‐223 (223Ra) improves overall survival (OS). However, the selection of 223Ra is not guided by specific validated clinicopathologic factors, and thus outcomes are heterogeneou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Esmail M. Al‐Ezzi, Husam A. Alqaisi, Marco A. J. Iafolla, Lisa Wang, Srikala S. Sridhar, Adrian G. Sacher, Nazanin Fallah‐Rad, Di M. Jiang, Geoffrey A. Watson, Charles N. Catton, Padraig R. Warde, Rob J. Hamilton, Neil E. Fleshner, Alexandre R. Zlotta, Aaron R. Hansen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-09-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4125
id doaj-da392819a41c4b0387329a1e9a5afd5b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-da392819a41c4b0387329a1e9a5afd5b2021-09-06T09:17:12ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342021-09-0110175775578210.1002/cam4.4125Clinicopathologic factors that influence prognosis and survival outcomes in men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with Radium‐223Esmail M. Al‐Ezzi0Husam A. Alqaisi1Marco A. J. Iafolla2Lisa Wang3Srikala S. Sridhar4Adrian G. Sacher5Nazanin Fallah‐Rad6Di M. Jiang7Geoffrey A. Watson8Charles N. Catton9Padraig R. Warde10Rob J. Hamilton11Neil E. Fleshner12Alexandre R. Zlotta13Aaron R. Hansen14Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto ON CanadaDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto ON CanadaDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto ON CanadaDepartment of Biostatistics Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto ON CanadaDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto ON CanadaDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto ON CanadaDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto ON CanadaDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto ON CanadaDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto ON CanadaDepartment of Radiation Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto ON CanadaDepartment of Radiation Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto ON CanadaDivision of Urologic Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto ON CanadaDivision of Urologic Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto ON CanadaDivision of Urologic Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto ON CanadaDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto ON CanadaAbstract Background In men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with primarily bone metastases, radium‐223 (223Ra) improves overall survival (OS). However, the selection of 223Ra is not guided by specific validated clinicopathologic factors, and thus outcomes are heterogeneous. Patients and methods This retrospective survival analysis was performed in men with mCRPC treated with 223Ra at our cancer center. Demographics and disease characteristics were collected. OS was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method (log‐rank). The potential prognostic factors were determined using both univariable (UVA) and multivariable analysis (MVA) (Cox‐regression) methods. Results In total, 150 patients with a median age of 74 years (52–93) received 223Ra between May 2015 and July 2018, and 58% had 6–20 bone metastases. Ninety‐four (63%) patients received >4 223Ra doses, and 56 (37%) received ≤4. The following pre‐treatment factors were analyzed (median [range]): eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS), (1 [0–3]); Albumin (ALB), (39 g/L [24–47]); alkaline phosphatase (ALP), (110 U/L [35–1633]); and prostate‐specific antigen (PSA), (49 µg/L [0.83–7238]). The median OS for all patients was 14.5 months (95% CI: 11.2–18). These factors were associated with poor survival outcomes in UVA and MVA: ALB <35 g/L, ALP >150 U/L, ECOG PS 2–3, and PSA >80 µg/L. By assigning one point for each of these factors, a prognostic model was developed, wherein three distinct risk groups were identified: good, 0–1 (n = 103); intermediate, 2 (n = 30); and poor risk, 3–4 points (n = 17). The median OS was 19.4, 10.0, and 3.1 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusions Pre‐treatment ALB, ALP, ECOG, and PSA, were significantly correlated with OS and could guide treatment selection for men with mCRPC by identifying those who are most or least likely to benefit from 223Ra. Validation in an independent dataset is required prior to widespread clinical utilization.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4125clinical managementneoplasmsprognostic factorsprostate cancerrisk modelsurvival
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Esmail M. Al‐Ezzi
Husam A. Alqaisi
Marco A. J. Iafolla
Lisa Wang
Srikala S. Sridhar
Adrian G. Sacher
Nazanin Fallah‐Rad
Di M. Jiang
Geoffrey A. Watson
Charles N. Catton
Padraig R. Warde
Rob J. Hamilton
Neil E. Fleshner
Alexandre R. Zlotta
Aaron R. Hansen
spellingShingle Esmail M. Al‐Ezzi
Husam A. Alqaisi
Marco A. J. Iafolla
Lisa Wang
Srikala S. Sridhar
Adrian G. Sacher
Nazanin Fallah‐Rad
Di M. Jiang
Geoffrey A. Watson
Charles N. Catton
Padraig R. Warde
Rob J. Hamilton
Neil E. Fleshner
Alexandre R. Zlotta
Aaron R. Hansen
Clinicopathologic factors that influence prognosis and survival outcomes in men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with Radium‐223
Cancer Medicine
clinical management
neoplasms
prognostic factors
prostate cancer
risk model
survival
author_facet Esmail M. Al‐Ezzi
Husam A. Alqaisi
Marco A. J. Iafolla
Lisa Wang
Srikala S. Sridhar
Adrian G. Sacher
Nazanin Fallah‐Rad
Di M. Jiang
Geoffrey A. Watson
Charles N. Catton
Padraig R. Warde
Rob J. Hamilton
Neil E. Fleshner
Alexandre R. Zlotta
Aaron R. Hansen
author_sort Esmail M. Al‐Ezzi
title Clinicopathologic factors that influence prognosis and survival outcomes in men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with Radium‐223
title_short Clinicopathologic factors that influence prognosis and survival outcomes in men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with Radium‐223
title_full Clinicopathologic factors that influence prognosis and survival outcomes in men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with Radium‐223
title_fullStr Clinicopathologic factors that influence prognosis and survival outcomes in men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with Radium‐223
title_full_unstemmed Clinicopathologic factors that influence prognosis and survival outcomes in men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with Radium‐223
title_sort clinicopathologic factors that influence prognosis and survival outcomes in men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with radium‐223
publisher Wiley
series Cancer Medicine
issn 2045-7634
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Abstract Background In men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with primarily bone metastases, radium‐223 (223Ra) improves overall survival (OS). However, the selection of 223Ra is not guided by specific validated clinicopathologic factors, and thus outcomes are heterogeneous. Patients and methods This retrospective survival analysis was performed in men with mCRPC treated with 223Ra at our cancer center. Demographics and disease characteristics were collected. OS was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method (log‐rank). The potential prognostic factors were determined using both univariable (UVA) and multivariable analysis (MVA) (Cox‐regression) methods. Results In total, 150 patients with a median age of 74 years (52–93) received 223Ra between May 2015 and July 2018, and 58% had 6–20 bone metastases. Ninety‐four (63%) patients received >4 223Ra doses, and 56 (37%) received ≤4. The following pre‐treatment factors were analyzed (median [range]): eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS), (1 [0–3]); Albumin (ALB), (39 g/L [24–47]); alkaline phosphatase (ALP), (110 U/L [35–1633]); and prostate‐specific antigen (PSA), (49 µg/L [0.83–7238]). The median OS for all patients was 14.5 months (95% CI: 11.2–18). These factors were associated with poor survival outcomes in UVA and MVA: ALB <35 g/L, ALP >150 U/L, ECOG PS 2–3, and PSA >80 µg/L. By assigning one point for each of these factors, a prognostic model was developed, wherein three distinct risk groups were identified: good, 0–1 (n = 103); intermediate, 2 (n = 30); and poor risk, 3–4 points (n = 17). The median OS was 19.4, 10.0, and 3.1 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusions Pre‐treatment ALB, ALP, ECOG, and PSA, were significantly correlated with OS and could guide treatment selection for men with mCRPC by identifying those who are most or least likely to benefit from 223Ra. Validation in an independent dataset is required prior to widespread clinical utilization.
topic clinical management
neoplasms
prognostic factors
prostate cancer
risk model
survival
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4125
work_keys_str_mv AT esmailmalezzi clinicopathologicfactorsthatinfluenceprognosisandsurvivaloutcomesinmenwithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertreatedwithradium223
AT husamaalqaisi clinicopathologicfactorsthatinfluenceprognosisandsurvivaloutcomesinmenwithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertreatedwithradium223
AT marcoajiafolla clinicopathologicfactorsthatinfluenceprognosisandsurvivaloutcomesinmenwithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertreatedwithradium223
AT lisawang clinicopathologicfactorsthatinfluenceprognosisandsurvivaloutcomesinmenwithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertreatedwithradium223
AT srikalassridhar clinicopathologicfactorsthatinfluenceprognosisandsurvivaloutcomesinmenwithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertreatedwithradium223
AT adriangsacher clinicopathologicfactorsthatinfluenceprognosisandsurvivaloutcomesinmenwithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertreatedwithradium223
AT nazaninfallahrad clinicopathologicfactorsthatinfluenceprognosisandsurvivaloutcomesinmenwithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertreatedwithradium223
AT dimjiang clinicopathologicfactorsthatinfluenceprognosisandsurvivaloutcomesinmenwithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertreatedwithradium223
AT geoffreyawatson clinicopathologicfactorsthatinfluenceprognosisandsurvivaloutcomesinmenwithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertreatedwithradium223
AT charlesncatton clinicopathologicfactorsthatinfluenceprognosisandsurvivaloutcomesinmenwithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertreatedwithradium223
AT padraigrwarde clinicopathologicfactorsthatinfluenceprognosisandsurvivaloutcomesinmenwithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertreatedwithradium223
AT robjhamilton clinicopathologicfactorsthatinfluenceprognosisandsurvivaloutcomesinmenwithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertreatedwithradium223
AT neilefleshner clinicopathologicfactorsthatinfluenceprognosisandsurvivaloutcomesinmenwithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertreatedwithradium223
AT alexandrerzlotta clinicopathologicfactorsthatinfluenceprognosisandsurvivaloutcomesinmenwithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertreatedwithradium223
AT aaronrhansen clinicopathologicfactorsthatinfluenceprognosisandsurvivaloutcomesinmenwithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertreatedwithradium223
_version_ 1717779874194653184