Microleakage of class V cavities restored with nanofilled resin modified glass ionomer and conventional glass ionomer with self etch adhesive and self etch primer

Background and Aims: Microleakage is a criterion proposed for assessing the success of any restorative material. Complete seal is difficult especially for dentin margins compared to enamel margins. The aim of this study was to assess the microleakage at the enamel and dentin margins of class V cavit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mansore Mirzaie, Esmaiel Yasini, Ladan Ranjbar Omrani, Morteza Rokni, Hojat Darvishpour
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2016-03-01
Series:Journal of Dental Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-810&slc_lang=en&sid=1
id doaj-da51333104da484faf874a732eaa3586
record_format Article
spelling doaj-da51333104da484faf874a732eaa35862020-11-24T23:32:18ZfasTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Medicine1024-641X2008-24442016-03-01284290297Microleakage of class V cavities restored with nanofilled resin modified glass ionomer and conventional glass ionomer with self etch adhesive and self etch primerMansore Mirzaie0Esmaiel Yasini1Ladan Ranjbar Omrani2Morteza Rokni3Hojat Darvishpour4 Background and Aims: Microleakage is a criterion proposed for assessing the success of any restorative material. Complete seal is difficult especially for dentin margins compared to enamel margins. The aim of this study was to assess the microleakage at the enamel and dentin margins of class V cavities restored by two GIs and two self-etch adhesive systems. Materials and Methods: This study was done on forty third molars. Class V cavities (3×2×2mm) were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of teeth using high speed handpiece with 0.8 mm diamond fissure burr. The occlusal margins of the cavities in the enamel and gingival marginswere placed 1 mm below the CEJ. The teeth were divided into 4 groups and the bondings were cured for 20 sec and the teeth were restored. The specimens were kept in distilled water at the temperature of 37°C for 24 hrs. The teeth were thermo cycled and cut in buccolingual direction using diamond disc under water. The dye penetration was evaluated using a stereomicroscope and the leakage was scored. The scores were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test while the paired comparisons were done using Bonferroni correction. P≤0.05 was regarded as significant results. Results: Microleakage scores were similar at the occlusal and gingival walls of all test groups. At the gingival walls, the least microleakage scores were observed. “Fuji IX + SE bond” group showed significant differences with the “Fuji IX + G bond” and “Nanoglass + G bond” groups (P≤0.05). At the occlusal walls, the least scores were observed in the “Fuji IX+SE bond” specimens which were significantly different from the other groups (P≤0.05). Conclusion: Self-Cure glass ionomers yielded less microleakage scores compared to the different types of light-cures due to the less polymerization shrinkage.http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-810&slc_lang=en&sid=1Leakage Glass ionomer cement Bonding
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mansore Mirzaie
Esmaiel Yasini
Ladan Ranjbar Omrani
Morteza Rokni
Hojat Darvishpour
spellingShingle Mansore Mirzaie
Esmaiel Yasini
Ladan Ranjbar Omrani
Morteza Rokni
Hojat Darvishpour
Microleakage of class V cavities restored with nanofilled resin modified glass ionomer and conventional glass ionomer with self etch adhesive and self etch primer
Journal of Dental Medicine
Leakage
Glass ionomer cement
Bonding
author_facet Mansore Mirzaie
Esmaiel Yasini
Ladan Ranjbar Omrani
Morteza Rokni
Hojat Darvishpour
author_sort Mansore Mirzaie
title Microleakage of class V cavities restored with nanofilled resin modified glass ionomer and conventional glass ionomer with self etch adhesive and self etch primer
title_short Microleakage of class V cavities restored with nanofilled resin modified glass ionomer and conventional glass ionomer with self etch adhesive and self etch primer
title_full Microleakage of class V cavities restored with nanofilled resin modified glass ionomer and conventional glass ionomer with self etch adhesive and self etch primer
title_fullStr Microleakage of class V cavities restored with nanofilled resin modified glass ionomer and conventional glass ionomer with self etch adhesive and self etch primer
title_full_unstemmed Microleakage of class V cavities restored with nanofilled resin modified glass ionomer and conventional glass ionomer with self etch adhesive and self etch primer
title_sort microleakage of class v cavities restored with nanofilled resin modified glass ionomer and conventional glass ionomer with self etch adhesive and self etch primer
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Journal of Dental Medicine
issn 1024-641X
2008-2444
publishDate 2016-03-01
description Background and Aims: Microleakage is a criterion proposed for assessing the success of any restorative material. Complete seal is difficult especially for dentin margins compared to enamel margins. The aim of this study was to assess the microleakage at the enamel and dentin margins of class V cavities restored by two GIs and two self-etch adhesive systems. Materials and Methods: This study was done on forty third molars. Class V cavities (3×2×2mm) were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of teeth using high speed handpiece with 0.8 mm diamond fissure burr. The occlusal margins of the cavities in the enamel and gingival marginswere placed 1 mm below the CEJ. The teeth were divided into 4 groups and the bondings were cured for 20 sec and the teeth were restored. The specimens were kept in distilled water at the temperature of 37°C for 24 hrs. The teeth were thermo cycled and cut in buccolingual direction using diamond disc under water. The dye penetration was evaluated using a stereomicroscope and the leakage was scored. The scores were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test while the paired comparisons were done using Bonferroni correction. P≤0.05 was regarded as significant results. Results: Microleakage scores were similar at the occlusal and gingival walls of all test groups. At the gingival walls, the least microleakage scores were observed. “Fuji IX + SE bond” group showed significant differences with the “Fuji IX + G bond” and “Nanoglass + G bond” groups (P≤0.05). At the occlusal walls, the least scores were observed in the “Fuji IX+SE bond” specimens which were significantly different from the other groups (P≤0.05). Conclusion: Self-Cure glass ionomers yielded less microleakage scores compared to the different types of light-cures due to the less polymerization shrinkage.
topic Leakage
Glass ionomer cement
Bonding
url http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-810&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT mansoremirzaie microleakageofclassvcavitiesrestoredwithnanofilledresinmodifiedglassionomerandconventionalglassionomerwithselfetchadhesiveandselfetchprimer
AT esmaielyasini microleakageofclassvcavitiesrestoredwithnanofilledresinmodifiedglassionomerandconventionalglassionomerwithselfetchadhesiveandselfetchprimer
AT ladanranjbaromrani microleakageofclassvcavitiesrestoredwithnanofilledresinmodifiedglassionomerandconventionalglassionomerwithselfetchadhesiveandselfetchprimer
AT mortezarokni microleakageofclassvcavitiesrestoredwithnanofilledresinmodifiedglassionomerandconventionalglassionomerwithselfetchadhesiveandselfetchprimer
AT hojatdarvishpour microleakageofclassvcavitiesrestoredwithnanofilledresinmodifiedglassionomerandconventionalglassionomerwithselfetchadhesiveandselfetchprimer
_version_ 1725534826648305664